Is Kushner the New Mandelson?
Watch the full podcast: https://t.co/HZdtfKiIiE
Gammonzilla is rising. Buy your mug here: https://t.co/KRTZmUAroJ
@MrHreviews | @Kingbingo_ | @firasmodad | @frankwrighter
Just finished watching Frank Wright’s interview on the Lotus Eaters podcast…..absolute masterclass.
This bloke is razor-sharp intelligent, effortlessly articulate, hilariously based, rock-solid composed and ridiculously engaging. Proper British legend with zero filter.
Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain, please, please, please move heaven and earth to get this man as a candidate.
He’s the best of British. On par with Enoch Powell. Cut him in half and you’d find a Union Jack running through him like a stick of rock. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Share, Share, Share, We need this man!
#RestoreBritain #LotusEaters #VoteRebeccaShepherd
If I might explain why people aren't receptive to this message:
You're appealing for moral consideration to be extended to Sikhs because of your personal good relationships with Sikhs. Likewise, I've met some nice Sikhs. Nothing against those individuals.
However, many people will have seen the clannish behaviour of the Digwa family — common on the Indian Subcontinent, regardless of religion — and conclude there are irreconcilable cultural and ethnic differences there, which led to a young man's murder.
Others will have seen Indians celebrating Henry's death, just as they celebrated the Sikh trucker killing a family with an illegal U-turn on a Florida highway, when they thought that family was white.
They will have seen the special pleading and ethnic lobbying accompanying that celebration: people saying the trucker didn't mean it, it was a mistake, to preserve a system (H-1b visas) which privileges Indians.
The same with Digwa and Henry Nowak. People see the pleading not to blame Sikhs, but notice some Sikh representatives sticking by their own.
The Sikh Press Association that put out a statement from Digwa's family, to garner sympathy for them.
The Sikh representatives who said Digwa "didn't intend" to kill Nowak, which is something they couldn't possibly know, but are just saying to deflect blame from their "community" and preserve their status of legal privileges over natives in our country.
The Sikh politicians making everything about "the far right".
They will see a system which permits and encourages their clannishness, their ethnic chauvanism, but tells us don't look back in anger when our children are killed.
And yes, Sikhs may be a small population relative to Muslims and Hindus. But the majority of Sikhs would side against the British people if they decided to ban all immigration from India to halt and reverse demographic change. Because they would see it is a disadvantage to their ethnic and religious group.
Therefore, they are counted by many among the undifferentiated mass of migrants that are robbing us of a claim to our country.
This makes the question, "Who is Britain for?", a zero sum competition for possession of the country: between the natives, and minorities with a shared interest in preserving a system of laws which privileges them over us.
The individual good character of given Sikhs is beside the point. What people want is for that system of laws to be abolished; for ownership of Britain to be restored to us; for our fate as demographic minorities to be prevented.
And most people think, with good reason, based on the pattern above, that most Sikhs will side against the measures that restore that balance of power, to the British people away from the liberal minorities-first system.
And so any defence of a "community" codes as a commitment to preserving that system, even if that isn't your intention, Tommy.
I felt compelled to finally speak about my viral Heathrow Airport tweets from last year, where the entire Indian Press descended upon me because I confronted the Indian foreign workers at Heathrow Airport for NOT speaking in English whilst working in a public facing role.
Indians will call you racist because they want bad things to happen to you.
Their clan culture to protect their reputation above all else, 'Izzat', explains this.
This culture is not compatible with our British way of life. Millions must go.
Even if I were to concede that the death penalty doesn't work as I deterrent — and I don't — it is still the right thing to do.
The moral ledger is imbalanced if criminals receive punishments less severe than the atrocities they commit, and if the taxes of grieving families are spent on feeding and housing their tormentor.
The death penalty is necessary. It is the only way to keep our families safe, and it is the only language these savages understand.
I read that nearly half of British students agree with the death penalty - that's exactly why Restore Britain is surging with young British men and women.
Zero bullshit politics.
The business of the House of Commons is not a consensus-building exercise. It is to govern a once serious nation.
Politics is divisive by nature.
Those like @MsAlisonHume who lack the stomach for it should save the rest of us any hassle by finding a more suitable line of work.
Restore Britain will eradicate anti-white racism across the country, but in the meantime we are dedicated to uncovering how far the cancer has spread.
@Lewis_Brackpool explains how we are doing that...
Henry Nowak suffers at the hands of the ideologically captured police, Keir Starmer claims no two tier issue and definitely don't racialise the murder.
David Lammy? Hold my beer. We NEED the judiciary to be diverse. Because race matters.
You couldn't make this up.