Awoken

Remigration is the only path to our survival as a people.
Retweets, Favourites, Following & Posting does not necessarily mean endorsement.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

I too believe western civilization is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups.

[Rep. Riley M. Moore @RepRileyMoore]

Hey @Keir_Starmer, I believe western civilization is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic & cultural groups.

I also think western civilization is under threat from leaders like you who hate your heritage and are ashamed of your ancestors.

[Dan 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Kingbingo_]

The trouble with this sort of hypersensitive turbo-Zionism is that the Telegraph has spent a week finding different ways to argue that Britain cannot prioritise its own national continuity because Jews might object to it.

I find the wisdom of that tactic highly questionable.

[Toby Young @toadmeister]

The chaos of open borders doesn't just harm native citizens – it fuels hostility towards well-integrated ethnic minorities too. Andrew Devine makes the case for an honest conversation about asylum fraud.
https://t.co/GoCJ43lr1c

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

I would advise all non-whites living happily and cohesively in Western countries to protest loudly and publicly about the non-white takeover of the West. Political/racial/religious war is coming, and you need to have a public history of being on the right side.

[Hunter Ash @ArtemisConsort]

People just casually toss out “judge people as individuals” when it comes to e.g. immigration policy, but it’s more a thought-terminating cliche than a serious policy proposal.

Every measurement should be judged primarily by two metrics: accuracy and cost. Group averages are obviously less accurate than a standardized test for e.g. IQ, but they’re basically free. This matters for any process that needs to scale, such as immigration screening. You can suggest education, income, etc as proxies, but degrees often mean something very different overseas, and income could be the result of crime or corruption. Even the individual measurements are high-noise.

Furthermore, there are many things that matter hugely for immigration policy that are ~impossible to test for individually. “Anyone who shares American values can be American” okay but what are those values, and more importantly HOW DO YOU TEST FOR THEM? Any questionnaire you design is going up on reddit tomorrow together with an answer key. For values, which again are hugely important, there really is no alternative to looking at the country of origin and saying “do we want more of what they’ve got going on?” It’s not even about cost vs accuracy trade-offs. There is no individual assessment available.

Osama bin Laden had an engineering degree.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Reform UK has said that a pact with Restore Britain is off - that is their decision.

I’m not getting into the personality differences of it all, I can’t be bothered.

We made our offer, a genuine attempt was made. It was based on policy. I didn’t particularly enjoy doing it, but I tried because I thought it was the right thing to do.

If Reform want to discuss policy, not personality, then they know where to find me.

My aim is now on continuing to present a laser-focused plan to the British people.

We’ve already done so on deportations, policing, energy, self-defence, economics and more.

Others are being worked on, and will be released over the coming weeks.

I am particularly proud of our economics paper which lays out a costed plan on how Britain can live within its means - vast cuts to first spending, then tax. Doing it slowly, carefully and properly.

It is a plan that will work.

This is what we must focus on.

Restore Britain stands on a radically different platform to any other party.

We must now prove that our plan can work.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

@timespolitics @RestoreBritain It had never occurred to me that there were so many people who expected support for Israel as a Jewish homeland whilst actively denying the British people retention of their own homeland.

But here we are.

It's really clear now.

There's no going back.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

@timespolitics Each one of these articles attacking @RestoreBritain's morally-necessary and long-overdue policies for restoring Britain's native demographic security illegitimately taken from us, exposes the profound hypocrisy of those I had previously supported.

[Steve Laws 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Steve_Laws_]

When big names in the entertainment industry start adopting our talking points, don't ankle bite at them because they haven't said it how we would. It helps nobody. Instead encourage them to speak out more.

Welcome them into the fold. Big voices echoing our talking points is huge and it shouldn't be taken for granted.

It's how leftists have dominated for decades. Learn from your enemies.

[Dan 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Kingbingo_]

Can anyone at @Telegraph tell me if any of the following are unreasonable:

“The Land of Britain is the historical homeland of the Native British People.”

“The realization of the right to national self-determination in the State of Britain is exclusive to the Native British People.”

“The State of Britain is the nation state of the Native British People” in which the Native British people realise their “natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination.”

“The State shall be open to Native British immigration, and the ingathering of the exiles.”

“The State shall act in the Diaspora, to strengthen the affinity between the State and members of the Native British People.”

“The State shall act to preserve the cultural, historical, and religious heritage of the Native British People.”

“The State views the development of Native British settlement as a national value, and shall act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation.”

“English is the language of the State.”

The immigration rights under the Law of Return are also extended to “a child and a grandchild of a Native Briton, the spouse of a Native Briton, [and] the spouse of a child and a grandchild of a Native Briton.”

“We hereby declare the establishment of a Native British State in Britain, to be known as the State of Britain.”

The Declaration grounds that state in the Native British people's “natural and historic right” and provides that Britain “will be open for Native British immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles.”

- I ask because every one of these is adapted, with minimal changes, from Israeli law or Israel’s founding declaration.

And this list actually goes further than Restore Britain does - which the Telegraph has spent the last week describing as fascist.

[Nick, 30 @an0n_Nic]

How do I cancel my subscription to the state?

[loz @KeithLeisure]

@AllisterHeath This is the red line for the establishment. Not the betrayal and dispossession of the British people. The reputation of Israel is all that matters.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Reform and Nigel Farage have finally made a response to our offer in the Daily Telegraph - I will go through their four conditions…

The Reform Chairman, Lee Anderson, has said Reform will not step aside in any constituencies. Reform should ‘always’ be on the ballot paper.

Meaning that Reform plan to run in every seat, even if there is an arrangement. This is not a constructive start.

I have been realistic. Clearly, the whole point of any arrangement would be not to divide the electoral force. That would mean certain Restore Britain candidates standing aside to ensure a sensible and pragmatic approach to our voting system.

If Reform are not willing to reciprocate in any constituencies, any at all, the offer I have made is entirely redundant.

They have also said we must endorse Farage to be Prime Minister, and allow the failed Conservative ministers to again be part of a future cabinet.

Contrary to reports, I have never said that Reform must dump anybody. That is not my place to do so. It is their party, it is entirely Reform’s choice who they run to be MPs or employ - it is putting these same ministers who failed Britain into a future cabinet which Restore Britain has helped to empower that I take issue with. Restore Britain will not be responsible for handing Nadhim Zahawi, Nadine Dorries and others some of the most powerful jobs in the country.

Farage and Reform have also said that Restore Britain must outright sack Charlie Downes - putting a young Christian man out of work, just as he is looking to build his life and start a family.

That is simply not how I operate.

But I want to be clear - if a sensible reciprocal arrangement can be found on our proposed policy platform, we would be willing to stand our Restore Britain candidates aside in certain seats in order to defeat the left-wing alliance. For any political party, that is a big step to make - country before party.

Reform have just outright rejected doing the same. If that position continues, then this whole exercise is futile.

A deal will mean give and take on both sides. I’ve been in business long enough to know that.

Our original offer was focused on policy, their response is about personality.

After all of the bad blood, if we focus on personality and ego, we will get nowhere. That much is obvious from the last seven days.

Our papers on economics, energy, deportations, policing and much more show exactly what can be delivered - properly considered policy must be central to everything.

The place to start this negotiation is on policy. Find common ground, sort out the clear differences, build on that and go from there.

Restore Britain remains open to good faith talks where both parties understand the brutal electoral reality we are facing.

[Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo]

How is it that in all the BBC reporting on Jason Arday, the “fact checkers” and “misinformation experts” at BBC Verify - with their 60+ staff and £3m budget - have been nowhere to be seen…🤔

If you only followed BBC reporting on this you’d have no idea what’s actually going on

[Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Landeur]

Restore Britain has managed to make the establishment say the quiet part out loud:

No, you can’t have a country, you must surrender your homeland to foreigners.

You see what they are offering, English man, and you now have a decision to make.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

RICU, the Home Office "Don't Look Back in Anger" department, has used opaque tactics for decades to control the government and media's response to terror attacks, to deflect blame from immigrants and Islam.

Community Liaison Officers foster trust and dependency with the grieving relatives and isolate them from other victims to discourage them from speaking out.

Journalist David Shipley has researched RICU's methods of manipulating the victims' families into giving statements which affirm the state's multicultural narrative.

They then nudge and neuter the contents of families’ victim impact statements, suggesting they include pro-Diversity messaging lest they cause a race riot and collapse the trial of their loved one's killer.

This insidious psychological warfare network needs to be shut down. Everyone involved is complicit in the atrocities that were not prevented because the public was pacified and failed to politically organise.

God forbid we find ourselves in these families’ situation, but if we do: do not comply with their gaslighting. Look back in anger, as loud as you can.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

@AllisterHeath You have the whole situation backwards, @AllisterHeath.
Mass immigration has been forced on us against our democratic will. It is an illegitimate policy that has entirely predictably created extreme demographic change in the UK.
Restoring demographic security is the moral policy

[Zoomer @ZoomerHistorian]

London was 90% White in the late 1970s.

London was just under 99% White in the 1951 Census.

London was never diverse historically, this was forced upon us five minutes ago in the grand scheme of things. Sorry, it's over. No one is going along with the mass delusion anymore. They want London to be White again.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

@scholarinvests @Nawjryw @reformparty_uk Yes - better to vote for rapid acceleration into the failure of the system that's anti-democratically destroying us as a people than a slower pace along the path to inevitable demographic extinction.

[Awoken @Londoner1956]

@Kingbingo_ Demographic security, or "DemoSec", must be restored if we are to survive as a people.

It may be counterintuitive, but any government on the Right that doesn't enact the policies to restore DemoSec is worse than a government of the Left that accelerates into a system failure.

[Oracle @biggle1908]

UK state pension is £241.30 per week after 35 years of National Insurance contributions.

The guaranteed minimum income for someone who has paid nothing into the system is £238.00 per week.

That means if you do the right thing, work and pay into the system you benefit by £3.30 per week 🤯

Just how is this right?

#Pensions

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

Reform voters don't want this.

I think the utopian ideal of colourblind individualism died a few million immigrants, rapes, and terror attacks ago, Laila.

This rhetoric might work if we had the demographics of the 90s. But we don't. And pretending everyone can behave like Englishmen is how we got into this mess.

Integration won't work, and is meaningless if all it amounts to is blissful ignorance and indifference to the inner lives of our increasingly strange neighbours.

Lots of people need to go back to countries run according to their preferences, and we should run out country according to ours.