🔥 BRITAIN CONSIDERING EXEMPTING MUSLIM MIGRANTS FROM CONSCRIPTION
Sir Richard Peter Moore, the head of MI6, has cautioned that if the UK enters the war against Russia, it will need to start conscripting young men.
However, according to reports, the draft would be optional for Muslim migrants.
Muslim men will stay behind to look after the Girls & Women.
They haven’t got a pot to piss in.
Healey eyes windfall tax on banks and oil companies.
Treasury hunts for ways to plug £4.7bn hole in public finances while seeking to shield families.
https://t.co/suMflFaXrf
Britain Is Changing One Minute at a Time. Nobody Asked Us.
Somewhere in Britain today, once every minute, a stamp is placed on a document and settlement or citizenship changes hands. Nearly 200,000 people received indefinite leave to remain this year, a 16-year record. A quarter of a million more became citizens. Shabana Mahmood is preparing reforms to slow this. Her own backbenchers are already working to gut them before they pass, exempting care workers and refusing to apply the rules retrospectively, so the 1.2 million migrants already approaching eligibility will sail through regardless of what Parliament decides.
The government cannot explain this contradiction because there isn't a clean one to give. Its own forecasters, the ONS, say Britain needs net migration near 230,000 a year simply to stop the working-age population collapsing before 2030, a figure they themselves call historically high and massively unpalatable. Two thirds of the public want it below 100,000. Ministers are therefore asking a shrinking, ageing workforce to fund immigration on a scale the public has repeatedly rejected.
The OBR has already done the sum the government won't say aloud. Low-skilled migrants cost more in public spending than they contribute in tax over a lifetime. Yet the visa data shows precisely this pattern taking root. Just 3.3 per cent of Zimbabwean workers have left Britain since arriving, 4 per cent of Nigerians and 4.5 per cent of Ghanaians. Compare that with 61 per cent of Saudis, 40 per cent of Belgians and 39 per cent of Germans. The routes Britain opened widest were those feeding the care sector at minimum wage, and they are the routes people do not leave. This was a conscious decision, repeated year after year, by governments that knew the costs.
And the consequences are not confined to spreadsheets. Mass immigration on this scale, without the integration needed to bind people into a common society, changes the character of the country itself. It alters the language, customs, schools, neighbourhoods and town centres around us. It changes what is taught, what is spoken, what is celebrated and what is regarded as normal. Most seriously, it weakens the shared culture and common assumptions that allow millions of people, many of whom have never met, to feel they nevertheless belong to the same country.
This did not happen by accident. Successive governments expanded migration routes, lowered barriers and encouraged recruitment from abroad while repeatedly ignoring warnings about housing, public services, wages, integration and social cohesion. They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless.
Mahmood's reforms will pass in some diminished form, applying to almost no one already here. The dependency ratio will keep tightening. The country that has changed will not simply change back. Lowering the inflow does not undo the transformation already created.
There is no minister, in this government or the one before it, who has ever stood before the country and said plainly: this is the scale of immigration we have chosen, this is what it will do to our economy, our communities and our national identity, and this is the price we are asking you to pay. That reckoning never came. The price was simply spent, a minute at a time, until there was nothing left to ask permission for.
"They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless."
WHAT THE HELL HAVE WE BECOME?
Birmingham City Council is going to the High Court over unauthorised flags and other attachments on its streets following a campaign overwhelmingly associated with the Union Flag and St George’s Cross.
The council says this is about highways, safety, intimidation and unauthorised use of street furniture.
Fine.
Then here’s a remarkably simple test:
Apply exactly the same rules to EVERY flag.
Union Flag? Same rule.
St George’s Cross? Same rule.
Palestinian flag? Same rule.
Pakistani flag? Same rule.
Somali flag? Same rule.
Bangladeshi flag? Same rule.
No favourites. No fashionable exceptions. No deciding that one community’s flag represents “diversity” while another’s represents a threat to “community cohesion”.
Because something has gone badly wrong when displaying the flag of England, in England, becomes something authorities feel compelled to explain, manage and take to court.
The Union Flag isn’t extremist.
The St George’s Cross isn’t racist.
They belong to everyone who calls this country home, regardless of colour, religion or ancestry.
And British people should never be made to feel embarrassed about displaying them.
If the issue genuinely is attaching things illegally or dangerously to council property, enforce that rule universally.
But if foreign national or political flags are tolerated in precisely the circumstances where British flags are removed, then councils should expect people to ask some extremely uncomfortable questions.
Patriotism isn’t hatred.
National pride isn’t extremism.
And equality doesn’t mean celebrating everybody’s identity except your own.
One city. One law. One standard. Every flag.
Anything less isn’t inclusion.
It’s hypocrisy wrapped in a diversity policy.
This man bought an eye fillet from Woolworths. After cooking it the texture was nothing like any steak he’d seen before.
I stopped buying supermarket meat after they started putting Bovaer in the cattle feed.
What’s going on here?
@BasilTheGreat Can a non-muslim white man apply for this role? If not then they're breaking the Equality Act 2010 by discriminating based on skin colour and religion. How can we ensure the business is representative of the diversity in the UK.
@KristiAmos9 The UN 🇺🇳 is the belly of the beast. Everyone moved in lock 🔒 step during the planned demic. Diabolical you can get pushed off land through weather warfare and it be blamed on “climate change” 🤌 sick satanic shit.
@NorthJerseySky Yep. They have many weapons to assist in their Diabolical Weather Modifications. They literally murder people, destroy their homes & farms then take their fucking land! Over & over
They’re definitely commanding these attacks thru our Military! All Nations Military! It’s Massive.
The most ignored aspect of weather modification 🤌 water vapor generation in conjunction with directed energy via Nexrad WSR 88-D which are placed on vessels 🚢 just like you see onland. Ocean based weather modification gets ignored cause the focus stays on the 🐍✈️ mercenaries.
So the Assisted Dying Bill is rearing its ugly head once again in the House of Commons on 11th September.
They are obviously determined to push this bill through.
I wonder why 🤔
I wouldn’t trust these people nowadays with my life.
Anyone else feel like this?