Lori

[Lori @Loriqff]

@AffinityWater Is it true that if you claim benefits you are exempt?

[paseq @xpaseqx]

Most savage moment in the entire movie:

“The laws are meant to protect the victims… not the perpetrators.”

Then he looks the judge who let six boys walk after gang-raping a 14-year-old in the eyes and says:

“You are the cancer that is killing society.”

This clip is why Citizen Vigilante was banned in parts of Europe.

Too close to the truth?

[Lori @Loriqff]

@SBarrettBar @JChimirie66677 Two tier justice. Has he been arrested?

[Lori @Loriqff]

@JChimirie66677 Brothers in arms. Traitors to the UK.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

They Were Here Because the State Put Them Here.

On Thursday, three failed asylum seekers were convicted of gang rape at Hove Crown Court. Abdulla Ahmadi, an Iranian, and two Egyptians, Karin Al-Danasurt and Ibrahim Alshafe, had arrived in Britain on small boats, been housed in a Home Office-approved hotel in Horsham, and spent an October night hunting a lone woman on Brighton beach. The prosecutor told the court they did not see their victim as a human being. They saw meat. They laughed while they raped her. They filmed it. Then they went back to the hotel and had a barbecue.

Al-Danasurt was a convicted murderer in Egypt who had fled specifically to avoid a lengthy prison sentence. He was granted asylum accommodation by the British state. On the same day as the conviction, Shabana Mahmood was in Dunkirk signing a £662 million deal with the French and calling it a landmark.

The detention centre at the heart of that deal holds 140 people. Forty-one thousand crossed the Channel last year. The arithmetic is not complicated. This is not a solution. It is a gesture with a budget and a camera crew.

And yet even that framing is too generous. Because if Britain, or France, truly wanted to stop the boats, they could. France accepts British money to intercept when it suits, which proves cooperation is purchasable. Australia stopped its boats entirely using turn-backs and offshore processing. Britain has the navy, the coastguard and the surveillance capability to do the same. What it lacks is the will. And the 2039 accommodation contracts, worth an estimated £10 billion, are the proof. You do not sign thirteen-year housing contracts for a problem you intend to solve. You sign them for a situation you have decided to manage permanently while telling the public something different.

That gap between the rhetoric and the reality is not accidental. It is the product of a progressive political culture that has made certain conclusions unreachable regardless of the evidence. Liverpool Council publishes official guidance telling residents there is no link between asylum seeker populations and violence against women, and commits public money to correcting anyone who says otherwise. The Equality and Human Rights Commission warns that describing migration as a risk is itself suspect. The legal industry turns every removal into a decade-long obstacle course. The NGO sector cites appeal success rates as proof of injustice rather than proof of a system designed to exhaust the state into surrender. None of this requires coordination. It requires only shared assumptions: that naming cultural risk is racism, that enforcement is cruelty, and that public concern is ignorance to be managed.

The Brighton conviction did not emerge from nowhere. It emerged from a system that brings in large numbers of unknown men from countries where women are treated as property, houses them in unsupervised hotels and dispersal accommodation in ordinary communities, near schools, parks and playgrounds, where they are free to come and go as they please, fails to remove them when their claims are rejected, and then instructs the public not to draw connections. One of Thursday's convicted rapists had a murder conviction in another country. He was here anyway. He was housed here anyway. And the government's response, on the day of his conviction, was a photo opportunity on a French beach.

There is a test that cuts through all of it. If forty thousand armed men crossed the Channel each year, the navy would be deployed and the boats would be stopped. The fact that they are not is a political choice. British women are paying for that choice. The Brighton victim paid for it on a beach in October.

She will pay for it for the rest of her life.

"Al-Danasurt was a convicted murderer in Egypt who had fled specifically to avoid a lengthy prison sentence. He was granted asylum accommodation by the British state."