Name of the game

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@VoiceInThe6ix @ScrumProduct @TorontoStar Why dont you look at the actual blueprints? As opposed to opining about things you clearly dont understand

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@VoiceInThe6ix @TorontoStar Nah shes correct, and the blueprints show you dont actually know anything.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@Glenn_Cashman @TorontoStar Did doug mention the cost of his plan?

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@JBeercann @TorontoStar Clearly you didnt look at the blueprints that show the provinces central concern was not restoring traffic lanes.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@realJohnKotyk @broddy83 @fordnation For both actually as opposed to streets with cars, something like 98% of fatal accidents involve some form of gas powered vehicle. And rates of serious injury are also high.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@realJohnKotyk @broddy83 @fordnation There are actually a lot of stats for bike use along the bloor corridor from actual traffic counts done for the city. The ones in the annex in particular are enlightening and show just how out.of touch this plan is.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@realJohnKotyk @broddy83 @fordnation Actually pretty common to see bicyclists on pedestrian streets in most places.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@realJohnKotyk @broddy83 @fordnation Bloor should be pedestrianized actually that would be an even better use of the space. And then you can park and subway along.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@mvbenter @sitkamedia Yes and no, if its not being used strictly to subsidize private apartments it can be useful.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@ALynch416 @fordnation Do you? I guess the truth really does hurt.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@Josephk90 @JimsonHogarth @sitkamedia So the answer in other words is cutting development fees that fund infrastructure, and sticking those costs on to existing residents. Basically what trickle down economics did in a more general sense.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@Josephk90 @JimsonHogarth @sitkamedia Thats what your doing, if we pet developers do whatever they want housing will be affordable is your position. The issue is that has never happened anywhere.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@realJohnKotyk @broddy83 @fordnation Why dont we revisit the jarvis bike lane removal and look at the major time savings that created if this is a good idea? You remember that project rob and doug stopped talking about in 2011 when it did zero to reduce travel times.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@mvbenter @JimsonHogarth @sitkamedia Yes, you can deffinately increase land value by changing the zoning, which by extension makes financing easier to secure.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@Josephk90 @JimsonHogarth @sitkamedia Applying trickle down economics to housing is an interesting approach

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@flofer19 @2sneakpeek @CP24 The parked cars on bloor will be back and the stopped trucks that always blocked the second lane during rush hour, and these guys will still be mad and have moved on to the next thing having accomplished nothing.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@45inda6 @9BallOverAll @CP24 We have Jarvis st as the case study in why this thinking doesnt work. Theirs a reason why Rob and doug didnt mention Jarvis once after 2011, because the travel time numbers basically didnt change at all once they removed the lanes there. So had to move on to the next thing.

[Name of the game @Lostinspace_202]

@9BallOverAll @CP24 Why do you want more people to drive?