one solitary snowy cone, so filmily exquisite, so spiritually white, that but for its immemorially familiar outline, one would surely deem it a shape of cloud.
https://t.co/NmlfROR3Gi
Now that I've completed making the tests for the end-of-term exams, I have more time to spend doing whatever I like to do. This is the second video I've watched so far.
↑この英文は私のオリジナルの英語です。それで、次にAIが修正したものを表示します。↓
Now that I've finished making the final exams, I have more free time to do whatever I want. This is the second video I've watched so far.
《AIの解説》
https://t.co/sRlw2WhHhj
As I watched this video, I began thinking about what it means to be granted a trial.
A trial is a place where the prosecution and the defense examine the evidence, and the facts of the case gradually come to light through cross-examination. However, Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty and thereby gave up his right to a trial. As a result, the evidence was never fully tested in court, and he never had the opportunity to present his case at trial.
From my perspective, he was arrested and imprisoned despite there being no convincing evidence other than a single DNA profile recovered from a suspiciously pristine knife sheath. In addition, the murder house was torn down surprisingly fast, which is basically like destroying evidence. Given these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that he is now seeking a trial.
Yes, it’s true that writing in English, rather than in our native language, can make what we say feel a little less heavy.
To be honest, I often tell myself that, as an English learner, I should try to express myself and communicate with others in English.
Please continue to take good care of yourself!😊
@RPP0112 I know that waiting for the results can be the most worrying part. I’ll be praying that it’s nothing serious.
I’m 100% sure that your English is already at an advanced level. I hope you’ll continue posting in English. I’d love to read more of your English-language posts.😊🌿
Art Objectsより
昨日読んだ部分なのだが、40%辺��で、何を言っているのか分からない現象に再度陥ってしまった。
A writer~languageはまだいい。「作家は古いやり方の重圧に抗って新たな言葉の組み合わせに向かって進まなければならない」みたいなことを言っていると思われる。
その例がWoolfで、「彼女は英語を馬の疾走のように走らせる。Uncle Tobyのように(と言ってもピンとこないが)一生懸命におもちゃの木馬に乗って、合理的な世界が霞むまで加速させ、次の瞬間には立ち止まり、私たちが毎日踏みつけている一輪の花を、初めて見るかのように見せてくれる」
もしかしたら、こうとってもいいのかもしれない。Woolfの英語のリズムはとても速い。そのために急に止まった時の衝撃が大きい。その衝撃ゆえに、以前は感じなかった足元の(比喩だろう)美を一層美しく思わせる。
今日も読もう。どんな困惑が待っているのか楽しみだ。
Art Objectsより
●自分の読んだ内容を整理するために今日もXに書いておこうと思う🤔
昨日読んだ部分にJames Joyceという人名が出て来るが、偶然にもConanの番組にも出ていた。
《SteinとJoyce��共通点》
...she was working up her life into artとHad not James Joyce done the same thing...を比較して分かることは、「自分の人生を芸術へと発展させている」
《二人の相違点》
Steinの方がflagrant and less apologeticと評されている。露骨で悪びれる様子がない。
この本の著者Jeanette WintersonはSteinを肯定しているのか、それとも否定しているのか。肯定否定で見ること自体、私が間違っているのかもしれない。