Excited to have presented the last part of my PhD at #modsim2023 this week, about how to create more flexible hydrologic models suitable in long drought conditions.
Do you work in environmental flows?
Do you support decision-makers?
๐Please take our survey exploring flow-ecology models and e-flows decision-making!
https://t.co/cpI1ANDvP2
Love my @GrumpyReviewer2 who's like "this result is not what I'd expect, it must be wrong" when the whole point of the paper is "here's an unexpected result, and this is what it means and how we can interpret it"
New paper just dropped describing the redevelopments we made to the MARRMoT modelling framework. Go check it out if conceptual hydrological modelling is your thing and you care about reproducibility of modelling results and code accessibility.
https://t.co/hQuaqKbfyO
Supervisor on review comments to my first paper:
"my thoughts are that they are exceedingly favourable reviews - possibly the best I've ever seen for a WRR article. Well done!"
A big shout-out to supporting supervisors, they exist! #AcademicTwitter@PhDVoice
@bjornivart@PhDVoice Of course, it depends on the tone. My reviewer seems to have actually thoroughly read through and legit didn't understand why I used some methods otherwise they wouldn't have criticized them. But of course if they're rude or clearly didn't read through, you go get them!
None of my tweets before this ever got more than a couple of likes, and we're now over 280 ๐ฑ. Love the support from the PhD and academic communities here on twitter ๐ฅฐ
@erinkburrell Just to clarify, there was nothing cruel about my reviewer 2, just a tonne of comments vs. really only a few minor ones from reviewers 1 and 3