One thing that strikes me as odd about the fine-tuning argument is that it is (at least I think it is) a 'modern' argument. I feel like modern arguments for God's existence are all awkward because if these arguments are supposed to be convincing while classical arguments
(and perhaps other modern arguments), is that he can only accept it as a valid argument if he also accepts some (set of) argument(s) for God’s existence that he previously thought invalid.
(in essence a radically ‘hidden’ God). So either it has always already been rational, or God just does not exist and there is something wrong with the fine-tuning argument. The final implication then, for atheists who are supposed to be convinced by the fine-tuning argument
@mboudry Al heb ik me niet heel erg in deze discussie verdiept voelt het op het eerste gezicht ontzettend suf om dit te zeggen. Je realiseert je wel dat we hier de meest geavanceerde chip-producerende machines op aarde hebben staan? Of de LHC.
AHAHAHAHA FUCK ALL OF YALL SAYING I WAS LYING,
I Don’t take pride in fouling our sport like this but DC took a risk here and saying it’s fake takes away from the courage it took him to expose the truth.
"What will happen to Europe if it keeps ignoring AI?"
Three American labs each (!!) operate more AI compute than all of Europe combined. Today we're launching Europe 2031: a story of what might happen if that doesn't change.
@mboudry 🫤 Anuna lijkt iets anders met degrowth te bedoelen dan jij en dat probeerde ze meermaals duidelijk te maken. Jij riskeert hier een stropop te hebben neergesabeld. Ik moet haar gelijk geven dat dit zo niet constructief was.