LoveWillSaveTheWorld

#WaterFirst

[Michael Warburton @For_Film_Fans]

“Practice any Art: music, singing, dancing, acting, drawing, painting, sculpting, poetry, fiction, essays, no matter how well or badly, not to get money & fame but to experience becoming, to find out what's inside you, to make your soul grow.”

[Science girl @sciencegirl]

Gulls produce vibrations that mimic the sound of raindrops which entices worms to the surface, a behaviour called worm-charming

[Giorgio @perennialmystic]

“When everything around you seems dark, look again – maybe you are the light yourself.”

~ Rumi

[LoveWillSaveTheWorld @LuvDaGameOrElse]

@elonmusk Is X not allowed there? Or is it more censored version

[Antidepressant Content @depressionlesss]

Be unstoppable

[Mustafa @oprydai]

space travel used to belong only to governments.

• nasa
• roscosmos
• military programs
• national budgets

then private builders entered.

how to build your own spaceship by piers bizony is about the shift from state-controlled spaceflight to personal space travel.

the important idea:

space is not magic.
it is engineering under brutal constraints.

• propulsion
• life support
• heat shielding
• materials
• guidance
• fuel
• risk
• cost

every kilogram matters.
every failure mode can kill.
every system depends on another system.

building a spaceship is not one invention.
it is thousands of solved problems working together.

the dream of personal space travel begins when space stops being mythology

and becomes a manufacturing problem.

[James Lockwood @QBlazedog61029J]

Made a cleaner mathematical version of the old spiral sphere diagram.

This is not just a decorative vortex. The red path is best read as a loxodromic / rhumb-line flow on S²: a curve crossing meridians at a constant angle while winding toward the polar coordinate singularities. The grid is the spherical coordinate frame, the vertical axis is the polar axis, and the green arrows mark the local orientation of the induced circulation. The “funnels” are not physical holes in the sphere. They are where the spherical chart degenerates at the poles.

So the object is really a phase-flow diagram on a sphere: latitude, longitude, handedness, winding, and polar compression all shown at once.

[Science girl @sciencegirl]

A ladybug in morning dew

📸 Jens Kolk

[love drops @lovedropx]

let it be visceral ~ stretch the senses…

[Culture Explorer @CultureExploreX]

Dostoevsky understood the modern crisis before it became normal. A man can study truth, praise progress, and speak about humanity while still failing to help the child standing in front of him.

This is the central wound inside Fyodor Dostoevsky’s short story, The Dream of a Ridiculous Man.

The man had spent years thinking about life, yet he had no strength left to live it. One winter night, after sitting with friends who spoke grandly about truth and progress, he walked home with a revolver waiting in his room. He had decided that this would be his last night.

On the way, a little girl grabbed his coat. She was wet, frightened, and begging for help. Her mother was sick. The man understood enough to know she needed him, yet he pushed her away and told her to find the police. When she kept pleading, he shouted at her. She ran off into the cold.

He reached his room, sat before the revolver, and prepared to die. Then the girl’s face returned to him. Her fear disturbed him. Her pain followed him into the silence. He wondered why guilt still hurt if life had no meaning.

Then he fell asleep.

In the dream, he saw himself dead. A bright being lifted him from his grave and carried him beyond the stars to another world. The people there looked human, yet they lived without greed, envy, lies, or cruelty. They loved naturally. They had no need to explain happiness because they lived inside it.

Then he corrupted them. One lie led to another. Pride entered. Envy followed. Soon they competed, deceived, punished, and killed. When he begged them to remember who they had once been, they mocked him. They said they had science, knowledge, and the laws of happiness. They believed understanding happiness mattered more than happiness itself.

He woke at six in the morning. The revolver still sat before him. He threw it away.

The dream had given him a task. He would find the little girl. He would tell people the truth. They would call him ridiculous again, but this time he knew something they had forgotten.

A life without love can know everything and still understand nothing.

Dostoevsky’s lesson attacks one of the modern world’s favorite lies that knowledge alone can save us.

The man in the story has thought about life so much that he has stopped living it. He can judge society, expose hypocrisy, and explain despair, yet one suffering child reveals the poverty of his soul. That is the force of the story.

A little girl does what philosophy cannot do. She brings him back to responsibility.

The dream shows the same truth on a larger scale. A perfect world falls when deceit enters it, then its people begin to defend corruption. They suffer, yet call their suffering wisdom. They lose happiness, then comfort themselves with theories about happiness.

Dostoevsky noticed that a civilization can become brilliant and still become cruel. It can build systems, write laws, praise progress, and lose the simple moral instinct that tells a man to help a child in the rain.

His final lesson is severe and necessary. Truth begins with love in action.

Love begins with the person in front of you. That is why the ridiculous man becomes wise. He stops studying life from outside and accepts the burden of living it.

For more content like this, subscribe to the Culture Explorer…
https://t.co/Hc731pN3VC

[Math Files @Math_files]

Golden ratio

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A child prodigy who finished his Harvard degree at 14 and his PhD at 17 sat down in 1948 and wrote a single book that invented the entire conceptual vocabulary we still use to talk about AI, robotics, self-driving cars, and reinforcement learning.

He never got the credit. Most people have never heard his name.

His name was Norbert Wiener. The book was called Cybernetics.

Every feedback loop running inside every system you interact with today traces back to one problem he was handed during World War II.

The problem was this: how do you aim a gun at a fast-moving airplane?

By the time your shell arrives, the plane is somewhere else. You cannot aim at where the plane is. You have to aim at where the plane will be. And the plane's pilot, knowing this, is constantly changing course to make that prediction wrong.

Wiener spent years on this. What he built to solve it was not a better gun. It was a new science.

He noticed something that nobody had formally described before. The gun system and the human nervous system were solving the same problem using the same method. You observe where the target is. You compare it to where you want to hit. You calculate the gap. You correct. You observe again.

He called that loop feedback.

Not in the casual sense people use it today. In the precise mathematical sense. A signal goes out. The result comes back. The system compares the result to the goal. The gap between them drives the next action. The loop closes.

That mechanism, exactly as Wiener described it in 1948, is what runs inside every thermostat, every autopilot, every cruise control system, and every AI training loop on the planet right now.

When GPT-4 learned to answer questions better, it was doing feedback. When AlphaGo learned to play Go, it was doing feedback. When a self-driving car adjusts its steering because it drifted two inches toward the curb, it is doing feedback.

The word they all use, the concept underneath the word, the mathematics formalizing the concept, all of it came from one book written by a child prodigy in 1948 who was trying to figure out how to shoot down a plane.

The deeper insight was what he proved about living systems and machines.

Before Wiener, biology and engineering were treated as completely separate domains. Organisms adapted. Machines calculated. The idea that you could describe both using the same mathematical framework was not just unusual. It was considered a category error.

Wiener proved it anyway.

He showed that a brain correcting a reaching movement and a missile correcting its trajectory were running mathematically identical control loops. The hardware was different. The math was the same. Living systems and engineered systems obeyed the same laws once you understood what those laws actually were.

He named the field after the Greek word for steersman. Kubernetes. Cybernetics. The person who holds the rudder, reads the water, and adjusts constantly to hold a course through a current that is always pushing the ship somewhere else.

That is the mental image he wanted. Not a machine that executes instructions. A system that responds to its own results.

The third thing he did is the part almost nobody connects to modern AI.

In 1948, Wiener spent an entire chapter of Cybernetics warning about what would happen when machines that learn from feedback were given control over consequential decisions.

He described the displacement of workers not as a distant possibility but as a near-term certainty. He wrote about the ethical risks of building systems that optimize for measurable proxies of human values rather than actual human values.

He described in plain language what alignment researchers today call Goodhart's Law without using that name, 25 years before Charles Goodhart published anything.

He was a mathematician in 1948 writing about problems that AI safety researchers are still trying to solve in 2026.

The book is dense in places. The equations are real and the sections on statistical mechanics require actual attention. But Wiener knew this, which is why in 1950 he published The Human Use of Human Beings, which is the same book with all the math removed. Same ideas. Same warnings. Written for anyone who reads English.

That second book has been in print for 75 years and almost nobody in tech has read it.

Wiener died in 1964 at a conference in Stockholm. He collapsed mid-conversation between sessions. He was 69.

He did not live to see a personal computer. He did not live to see the internet. He never saw reinforcement learning, neural networks, or the AI systems that run almost entirely on the mathematical architecture he designed while trying to solve a World War II gunnery problem.

Every AI lab in the world today is building systems that run on his framework. Almost none of the people building those systems know his name.

The field he founded, cybernetics, mostly disappeared as a word. The ideas did not disappear. They dissolved into every other field. Control theory. Cognitive science. Computer science. Neuroscience. AI. They each took a piece of what he built and called it their own terminology.

The word that survived is the one that proves he invented it.

Feedback.

You use it every day. You use it in code reviews, in meetings, in conversations about AI performance. Every time you use it in the technical sense, meaning a signal that closes a loop between output and goal, you are using the exact definition Wiener wrote down in 1948.

He gave the word its meaning. Most people using it have never heard of him.

The Human Use of Human Beings is free on archive. Cybernetics is in print and available anywhere books are sold. His major essays are in academic archives at no cost.

The man who built the foundation of modern AI was writing about its dangers before the first commercial computer existed.

Most people building AI today have never read a word he wrote.

[🜌🜈🜓 @D4rk_n3ws]

-The alchemical structure of endurance-

[Enezator @Enezator]

They installed machines in Türkiye to feed stray cats, and now some seagulls have learned how to meow hoping they’ll get food too 😭🐈