10x. 100x. 1000x. And then $1T a year.
Starlink V3 is 10x more capable than V2, and SpaceX is launching 10x as many.
Bandwidth: 100x in just 2-3 years.
AI demand: already 1,000x human demand.
Musk does the math: 100 GW of AI compute to space a year, even at $10, is 1 trillion dollars a year. extra. At $50, it’s 5 trillion. And it stacks, every year, because the satellites don't vaporize.
🛰️🔥
$SPCX
@Alexand73883254 I did because $SPCX has a real, growing business: launches, Starlink, and long-term contracts that I can actually understand and follow.
$SPCX My $SPCX position is so much bigger than I used to think it should be, but not as much more as I believe in the missions that the Company carries: it will be a “Universal” stock, in the meaning of how its products/services affect every angle in your life, and in the meaning of its bringing you to the “Universal” standards, breaking the Earth’s limits of distance, scarcity and opening a world where connection, energy, and abundance are for everyone. 🛰️🔥
Which path would you prefer?
1. $SPCX skyrockets and you become insanely rich, by Earth standards.
2. We reach unlimited abundance, and money stops mattering.
So, $SPCX slides and $TSLA spikes after the merger progressing news. What’s the implication?
Well…, should I act like I’m already rich and don’t care about $$$ now, lol.
All systems are looking good, and weather is favorable for liftoff. Propellant load is about to begin for Falcon 9’s launch of the USSF-627 mission from California → https://t.co/IdlZbviZZl