QVEEN

help🥺

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@adokiye_dennis Interesting

Check your dm

[Stav Zilbershtein @mightyking]

Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5 - same viral video

There is only one ruler and it's clear who

prompt:

Raw vertical phone video (UGC), handheld throughout, filmed by a friend who walks with the group, casual sway, natural night lighting, wide-angle lens, deep focus.

Characters

The hero is a young woman with long dark hair in a deep-purple one-shoulder dress with a small shoulder bag.

Her three friends: one in a dark brown dress, a blonde in a black wrap dress, a blonde in a white mini dress — party dresses and sandals.

Laughing, spontaneous night-out energy.

Setting

A luxury marina at night — a stone quay along a narrow water slip flanked on both sides by large moored luxury yachts, big white hulls rising on either side, masts and rigging above, fenders on the hulls.

Warm orange street lamps, palm trees, distant city lights.

The yachts glow with blue-turquoise underwater LED lights spilling into the water; a yellow mooring line runs to the stone.

Shot list

0.0s–4.0s — Wide tracking shot, eye level, camera moving backward
The camera walks backward ahead of the four women as they stroll toward it down the marina promenade, framed head-to-toe, laughing and chatting in French; warm lamplight and palm trees behind, slight handheld bob.

4.0s–6.0s — Medium shot, eye level, backward track + quick left pan
The woman in the purple dress surges ahead of the group toward the lens, one arm raised, hair flying; the camera, on their left, keeps tracking back and pans to hold her.

6.0s–8.0s — Medium-wide, camera tilts down-left to follow, whip motion
She reaches the quay edge between the moored luxury yachts and launches headfirst over the edge; the handheld camera whips left and tilts down to chase her off the stone.

8.0s–10.0s — High-angle wide, looking down at the water, slight jolt
From up on the quay the camera looks down as she plunges headfirst into the blue-turquoise water in the slip between the big yacht hulls — a big splash, the underwater lights glowing around the impact; the handheld frame jolts slightly with the motion.

10.0s–13.0s — High-angle medium, looking down, small handheld drift
She surfaces in the teal water, gasping and laughing up at the camera, hair slicked back, treading water.

13.0s–16.0s — Handheld tilt up and back down, slight zoom
The camera lifts off the water and tilts up to a person leaning on the deck railing of one of the moored luxury yachts, watching her in the water, then tilts back down and zooms slightly in on her still treading and laughing.

16.0s–20.0s — High-angle medium, tilting to follow her up
She swims to the stone quay wall, reaches up and grabs a thick dark mooring pole, and hauls herself out; the camera tilts upward with her as she rises from the water, legs braced on the stone.

20.0s–23.0s — Low/close medium at the quay edge, static handheld
She climbs onto the stone lip, rolls onto her side, soaked dress clinging, then pushes up to her feet; the camera holds close, catching the water running off her.

23.0s–27.0s — Medium shot, eye level, loose handheld reframe
Back on the promenade, dripping wet, she flips her long wet hair forward and wrings it out, laughing, as her friends and passing pedestrians move behind her.

27.0s–30.0s — Medium shot, eye level, camera settles
Still dripping, she straightens up and strikes a confident, playful pose for the camera — hand on hip, tossing her wet hair back with a big smile — her friends laughing around her; the camera holds on the pose to end.

Audio

Live sync sound — friends laughing and shouting excitedly in French, a scream at the leap, a big water splash, water sloshing against the yacht hulls, wet footsteps on stone, ambient night marina sounds.
No music.

Style

Raw amateur vertical phone footage, natural night lighting, warm street lamps mixing with the turquoise underwater yacht glow, authentic handheld motion.

[Nikolai Stakheiko @thisisnikolai]

Our new agent generates kitchen plans in 30 seconds

…with editable construction docs:
- elevations & floorplans
- realistic 3D
- live quotes (real manufacturer SKU's & prices)

We're solving kitchens first because it's the most difficult remodel, and will unlock the whole home.

For architecture work, humans and agents will need to collaboratively prototype in one place… We believe the solution that wins long-term will consume the least cost (i.e. mental strain, time, tokens/energy).
-> In this video, I drop a google image, 80% of the plans get built by the agent, and then I make the last batch of edits manually

This is possible because:
- in 1 year, we built a procedural 3D engine fully from scratch (ThreeJS x WebGPU)
- The agent only determines the high-level parameters, delegating the low-level "physics" stuff to the engine

I go more in-depth on what we’re building here:
https://t.co/jKVmkGWGZq

[Golden Dose @GoldenDose]

فتاة توثق في مقطع:

"لم أكن أعلم أنه يمكننا القيام بهذه الحركة السرية في تطبيق الواتساب 🤯!".

[Neuron Powers 🧠 @neuronpowers]

The Art of rewiring your brain

[Victoria Enebeli 🙂‍↔️ @iamveektoria_]

For data analytics, use this one

https://t.co/nSrBvOd5lW

You are welcome

[i1muvee @i1muvee]

THE BEAST aka LA BÊTE (1975)
Certificate : 18
A cult film featuring sex between a woman and a beast by director Walerian Borowczyk. Lucy (Lisbeth Hummel) needs to marry Mathurin (Pierre Benedetti), the son of a wealthy French land owner Marquis Pierre (Guy Trejan), in order to claim her inheritance. Pierre’s daughter, Clarisse (Pascale Rivault), is sexually intimate with their black servant, Ifany. Pierre’s uncle showed Lucy a book noting the encounter of Romilda with a beast in the local forest 200 years ago and Lucy discovered several drawings depicting bestiality and was sexually excited. Lucy began to have dreams of the beast and Romilda after witnessing horse mating – Mathurin was a horse breeder.
https://t.co/30E6OgDIAf
#french #bestiality #fantasy #erotic #comedy

[JVE @JurrianEerden]

Google Ads Dropshipping is like bitcoin in 2013

[Enzo Sanchez | IA @EnzoSanchezIA]

🚨 URGENTE: Claude ahora puede CREAR un canal de YouTube desde cero y llevarlo hasta la monetización en solo 90 días. 100 % gratis.

Aquí tienes 8 prompts para conseguirlo:

[Big Dan @bigdanupdates]

My Clipping revenue vs Youtube revenue

Why Clipping Is Better Than YouTube Automation !!

For years, YouTube automation has been marketed as one of the best ways to make money online.

While it can become a highly profitable business, there’s another model that’s proving to be a better starting point for many people today: CONTENT CLIPPING.

Ride with me as i open your eyes to the truth you never knew >>>>>

1. You Can Start With Almost No Money

One of the biggest barriers to YouTube automation is cost. A quality automation channel usually requires a scriptwriter, voice-over artist or recording, video editor, thumbnail designer, and sometimes research tools. Even if you do some of the work yourself, expenses can add up quickly.

With clipping, your startup costs are minimal. If you have a phone or laptop, Clipping tools, and an internet connection, you’re ready to begin.

2. Faster Path to Earning

A YouTube automation channel often takes months before it qualifies for monetization. During that time, you’re investing time and sometimes money without any guarantee of income.

Clipping offers the possibility of earning much sooner through creator clipping programs. Instead of waiting months to qualify for ad revenue, you can potentially start generating income as soon as your clips begin performing well.

3. No Need to Build a Channel From Scratch

Growing a YouTube channel is difficult. You need subscribers, watch time, consistent uploads, and patience.

With clipping, you’re focusing on creating engaging short-form content from existing long-form content (while following the platform’s and creator’s rules). Your success depends more on making compelling clips than on building a brand from zero.

4. Content Production Is Much Faster

Creating one high-quality YouTube automation video can take several hours or even days.

A good clip can often be produced in a fraction of that time, allowing you to publish more content, test more ideas, and improve faster.

5. Easier to Scale

Once you develop an efficient workflow, producing more clips becomes much easier. You can work across multiple creators, topics, or campaigns without needing a large production team.

Scaling a YouTube automation business usually means hiring writers, editors, voice actors, and thumbnail designers, or upgrading to a more expensive tool which increases both costs and complexity.

6. Lower Financial Risk

Many people spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars on YouTube automation before earning their first dollar.

Clipping lets you learn valuable editing, storytelling, and audience retention skills while risking far less money.

7. Less Creative Pressure

Running an automation channel means constantly researching topics, writing scripts, recording voiceovers, and producing original videos.

Clipping is more focused on identifying the most engaging moments and presenting them in a way that captures attention. For many people, this makes the workflow simpler and more sustainable.

But To Be Fair…

YouTube automation still has major advantages.

A successful automation channel can generate passive income for years through ad revenue, sponsorships, affiliate marketing, and digital products. You also own and grow your own audience, which creates long-term business opportunities.

Clipping, on the other hand, often depends on platform rules, creator policies, or specific programs. It can produce faster cash flow, but it may not always offer the same level of long-term ownership or income flow.

My Advice

If you’re starting with limited capital and want to begin earning online as quickly as possible, clipping is one of the best.

If your goal is to build a long-term digital asset that you fully own, YouTube automation is still one of the strongest options but it requires more patience, time, and investment.

Like i always say, Clipping is just a lazy man’s way of making cool cash.

So which one are you starting today?

Clipping or Youtube automation??

[The maestro @maestroslay]

A faceless channel run on Claude and ElevenLabs hit $10K a month. The owner spends 3 hours a week on it.

4 months from zero, and the machine is mostly prompts.

The first rule breaks hearts: don't pick the niche you love, pick the one that pays. Finance runs around $20 per 1,000 views. Entertainment pays $3 to $8 for the same views. Same work, triple the invoice.

The math at scale gets loud. 500,000 monthly views at finance rates clears about $10,000 from AdSense alone.

The script system is where most people fail. Claude writes bad scripts by default, so his prompt forces structure: a pattern interrupt in the first 30 seconds, open loops that tease the payoff, spoken English instead of essay English, visual cues per scene. That prompt replaces a $200 scriptwriter.

The rest of the pipeline: ElevenLabs voices it, stock footage fills it, Claude writes titles, tags and chapters.

Month 4 adds affiliates and sponsors on top.

I recalculated the RPM gap twice.

Passion picks the niche. RPM pays the rent.

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@mslaggert @_egungunn France 2 - Morocco 1

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@HRRonald001 Active 🙏🏽

[HR Beno @BenoHr80463]

Other Remote Job platforms that pay as much as Outlier 👇

[BIG CHRIS @chrisdadiva]

How to Start a YouTube Channel With Claude in 2026 (Complete Tutorial)

In this video you will learn Learn how to start, scale, and monetize a YouTube channel using Claude AI.

You will learn the exact prompts, workflows, and strategies you will use to grow your channels fast.

This is the same strategy have been used for over six years across channels with hundreds of thousands and millions of subscribers.

You will learn how to pick a niche using Claude, how to develop a brand voice that makes you stand out, how to find viral video ideas using the YouTube algorithm and outlier research, how to write titles, thumbnail concepts, and full script outlines with AI, the exact YouTube upload settings to maximize reach in 2026.

You will learn how to read your analytics and use Claude as your personal YouTube strategist, and three ways to monetize including ad revenue, sponsorships, and your own product or service.

This information is for both new and existing Youtube creators, who wants to learn how to monetize a faceless channel in 2026.

Like, Retweet and Bookmark.

Follow @chrisdadiva

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@web3righteous Interested

[Frogify @0xFrogify]

She’s making $10,000 a month with a cartoon bunny.

Not a real character.
Not a big team.
Just an AI bunny named Fluffy that she created in 7 minutes.

1/4 - She takes viral kids videos

2/4 - Throws the link into ChatGPT

3/4 - Gets a prompt, and generates the whole thing inside Picsart Flow.

4/4 - Some of her videos are pulling hundreds of millions of views.

YT pays from $1,000 to $10,000+ for 1 million views on long format vids

While most people are still trying to come up with original ideas and burning out…

She’s copying what’s already working, turning it into AI content, and letting it print.

This is one of the fastest and dumbest ways to make money on YouTube right now.

Most people will watch this and think it’s too good to be true.

The ones who actually try it are going to be in a completely different position in a few months.

Watch exactly how she’s doing it 👇

Follow me if you want to see EXACT step-by-step guide. I will post iton my X shortly, notifs on!

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@MrCharlesky Hey can I get the code

[QVEEN @MADDxLA]

@zillionokoye I need the code 🙏🏽

[Lummox @Lummox_eth]

21 videos per week. 150,000 views daily. $3,000-$10,000 a month

YouTube's algorithm does not reward the most creative creators.

It rewards the ones who publish 4 times a week without breaking down.

One video takes a full day. Description alone is 45 minutes. Multiply that by 4 uploads per week and the math breaks you.

Most channels pay not because the content is weak but because the creator runs out of bandwidth.

Claude solves the production bottleneck directly.

Feed it your raw idea and speaking points.

A tech channel publishing twice per week earns around $300 monthly at 50,000 views.

The same creator using Claude to publish before a single sponsorship lands.

The content does not get worse. YouTube interprets that as authority and pushes the channel harder.