@GeraldSlaby1@JustinMeck_@proamericapol 2/5 is not most. And by and large the American public is clueless about a lot of things. So what they care about isn’t really the issue here.
@ABSports99@discGolfZulu@NewsOn6 Having a kid in challenger doesn’t make your other kid eligible to lay in that district. Unless the kid is 7 years old or less.
@ABSports99@discGolfZulu@NewsOn6 They misapplied the sibling rule to get a kid eligible that wasn’t eligible. They also most probably committed fraud by misrepresenting that his sibling was younger than he/she actually was, that he/ahe was even eligible to play challenger, then didn’t have any challenger game