@spanky realistically do you actually want what you call fundamental fairness, the fact these books limit are what keeps them soft, an unlimited playing field simply makes the game much tighter on margin and it's less of an account game and more of an edge game.
@pgd216@iPulpNFTs@CashoutKingJJ Why is a +600 mathematically better than +1000, if you could find breakeven lines then the +1000 line returns 10000 in 11 attempts so a 91% yield and the +600 returns 600 over 7 attempts returns a 85% yield, it just becomes a question of bankroll and house as to how high to go
@secretbettin@jhorsewhisperer A fraction of kelly is a much more reasonable approach, atleast once you’ve reached a bankroll threshold in which losing a significant portion of it would be damaging.
The growth of tcgs in the last 5 years isn’t because people love playing these games, it’s because the studios worked out how to use gambling industry techniques to farm their customers at a much higher rate. These card company’s are often morally equivalent to casinos or bookies