@DrayvenMF@GaryScotianNS Dont kid yourself. The only way your new hero Carney won from your old hero Trudeau, was Trump. As long as there is Trump as the villain, the media and you lemmings will see Carney as the hero.
People will clue in just like they did with your hero last year
"MAGA like" or "MAGA adjacent".....the new Nazi, Xenophobe, Mysogist! Hahaha
You nutbars need to cut the groupthink and get new tropes.
Carney is the only one who has ever used MAGA in a speach. Only now after realizing Elbows Up Economics is good for politics, bad for the country.
Drop the condescending mandatory reading bullshit. We understand revisions perfectly and that's why your argument is dead.
The latest revision to Q4 was downward to -1% annualized (from the prior -0.6%). The StatCan document you linked shows average revisions to real GDP growth rates are tiny (~0.14 pp mean absolute). These aren't going to flip the contraction.
Technical recession on annualized rates is based on the actual published data. So keep coping while reality wins.
You're lying or just clueless.
The technical recession call is explicitly on annualized rates. Q4 revised to -1%, Q1 at -0.1%. That's why CBC, BNN, Reuters and every outlet is calling two straight quarters of contraction. Your non-annualized claim is completely backwards. That's goalpost-moving bullshit.
And "wait a year for reliable estimates"? Q4 was already revised downward (worse) and Q1 missed forecasts by a mile. Your little revision picture from past quarters is irrelevant when the updates here went against your narrative.
Wrong again. StatsCan already revised Q4 2025 DOWN to a full 1% contraction. Q1 2026 came in at -0.1% annualized (vs +1.4% expected) such a surprise miss! That's two straight quarters of negative growth and three of the last four contracted.
Technical recession by the numbers.
Your 'future revisions will magically fix it all!