If you're out canvassing or driving around Makerfield this weekend, I've got you covered!
My song is now free to download on Soundcloud. Turn it up, get it blasting, and let's make some noise! 🔥
Link in the comments 👇
#MISSING | Can you help us find Anna, 13, from Sutton? Last seen on Wednesday, 3 June. She is believed to be travelling on buses across London. If you have any info please contact police on 101 quoting 01/7640009/26
Why is Mad Miliband seemingly allowed to destroy this nation???
Signing a legally binding target of cutting co2 again ... and by a whopping 87% by 2040?!!!
Miliband is a dangerous ideological extremist
Our co2 levels are relatively, some of the lowest in the world!
Co2 is GOOD and already at near historic lows!!
Co2 is only 0.04% of the atmosphere
And nature is responsible for 97% , so man only 3%
Ànd the U.K. 1% of that
So the Gov is destroying the UK for 1% of3% of 0.04%
Ergo
0.04% = 0.0004
3% of 0.04% → 0.03 × 0.0004 = 0.000012
1% of that → 0.01 × 0.000012 = 0.00000012
✅ Final answer:
Decimal form: 0.00000012
Percentage form: 0.000012%
Plus we are at near record lows of co2 , and Plants die at 200PPM. They need 1200PPM to grow optimally (3x atmosphere CO2).
And Miliband wants to destroy the U.K. for THIS
Snd those that chastise the gas of life are the same people who think spraying sulphur en masse and aluminium into our skies in order to block the sun is a good idea
The damage this ideology has caused to Britain already is war like.
NOBODY ELSE IS FOLLOWING SUCH INSANITY
To me Netzero is a tool of our enemies to destroy countries like the U.K. and it just needs trecherous fools to carry out the strategy in the name of "doing good"
The people of Britain do NOT consent to this destructive madness!!
#StopNetzeroNOW
We are urgently seeking to find Luchia, 16, who was last seen leaving her home in Hailsham on Tuesday evening, 2 June.
Luchia has links to Crawley, London and Birmingham.
She is 5’8” with shoulder-length dyed dark blond hair and she has a tattoo on her right thigh.
She was last seen wearing a turquoise top with black sleeves, grey jogging bottoms and trainers and carrying a yellow JD bag.
If you have seen Luchia, or know where she is, please contact police on 999, quoting serial 1517 of 02/06.
I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.
Some extracts from our report…
“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”
“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”
“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”
“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”
“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”
“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”
“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”
“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”
“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”
“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”
“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”
“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”
But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...
It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.
And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.
Funded by us, of course.
How about improving data-linking systems?
The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.
And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?
“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”
The numbers…
£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal
All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.
And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.
Want more?
At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.
Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.
Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?
Us.
And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?
The Home Office isn’t sure.
It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.
Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…
And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?
“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”
The result?
“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”
Astounding incompetence.
But there’s more good news...
The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.
In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.
This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”
“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.
I have a better idea. My own view?
Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.
And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…
And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.
It isn’t. And it never will be.
It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.
A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.
Deport them all.
We should retire the phrase "two-tier policing." Not because it's not true - as per official police materials, it pretty clearly is - but because it goes nowhere near far enough.
When you look at tragedies like the death of Henry Nowak and try to capture it with a term like "two-tier policing", you end up inadvertently masking a vast constitutional catastrophe underneath a complaint about general procedure, something a review and a reworded leaflet can put right.
What happened to Nowak is a single visible outcrop of something far larger and far worse: the capture, one institution at a time, of the British state by the belief-system of a particular class. It is something to which the public are, slowly-but-surely, awakening, but it's well short of the reckoning it requires.
After all, we have a word for people who steal from an institution. We call it corruption - it is endemic in British public life, by the way - and we know what to do about it. But we have no working word for the thing that is worse: an ideology quietly replacing an institution's reason for existing. A virus of the institutional mind, a toxin of the institutional soul.
A police force exists to protect the public. But a captured police force exists to advertise its own virtue, and will leave the public to bleed on a pavement to do it. You needn't take this on faith: they wrote it down. The police's own Race Action Plan states, in black and white, that equal treatment is the very thing it has set itself against. The institution rewrote its purpose and published the confession, though it expects your submission, rather than your forgiveness.
Nowak's death is the product of that inversion. An officer trained to treat the accusation of racism as the most urgent fact in the room met a dying boy and a lying killer and performed exactly as trained. Nothing has malfunctioned here, nothing at all. The system did precisely what it is now built to do.
And it's not one rogue patrol, either, though the truculence of the Hampshire police commissioner in the face of his officers' malfeasance might tempt you to think otherwise. The same disease runs through institutions with nothing else in common.
Consider William Shawcross' review of Prevent, which found a counter-terror system so warped by fear of the word "Islamophobia" that barely a fifth of its referrals concerned Islamism, while four-fifths of live terror investigations did: an apparatus that exists to see the threat, trained not to look at it. Closer to home, we all know how forces now log tens of thousands of "non-crime hate incidents" - speech that broke no law - while most actual thefts end without a suspect even being sought. Captured institutions keep working. They simply pour their effort into whatever the creed rewards.
None of this is mysterious. Robert Conquest's old law holds that any institution not deliberately kept to its purpose drifts, sooner or later, toward the reigning orthodoxy. Bolt onto that a personnel machine - the diversity directorate, the recruitment that quietly screens for the right opinions - that makes careers out of professing the creed and ends them for doubting it, and the capture becomes self-sealing, because the captured now do the hiring.
What turns this from a blunder into a betrayal is who holds the beliefs and who pays for them. These are what Rob Henderson calls luxury beliefs, and beneath them sits the truth Christopher Lasch named thirty years ago in The Revolt of the Elites: a credentialed class that has seceded from the common life and no longer shares the nation's fate. The beliefs are status markers, costless to the people who profess them, because that class is insulated by the good postcode and the private option from every consequence of what it believes. The bill falls entirely on the people without the buffers - the boy stabbed on a night out, the girl in a town the council won't name being pimped around a circuit of cab drivers who may well be flying their cousins in from overseas to join in their activities.
A doctrine experienced as compassion by the people who hold it that is paid for in the blood of the people who don't.
And when one of those victims dies on camera, the same class looks the country in the eye and tells you that the thing you have just watched didn't happen, and that to have noticed it is the real bigotry.
There's no point talking about reviews or inquiries. We're passed that point. If you want this to stop, you need to be thinking about institutional recapture. We need to commit people, means, and time to the task of hauling each institution back to the job it was built for:
- The police to protect
- The courts to judge on the evidence according to law delivered by a mandated parliament
- Local councils devoted to matters of local import, rather than those which spend their times siphoning away procurement funds and pontificating on matters of obscure foreign policy
...and restoring the most unfashionable principle left in British life, that the state is blind to who you are and answerable only to the truth. Equality before the law is part of the great inheritance we have bequeathed the world, and it has been taken from us on purpose, by people convinced they knew better.
It was taken from us because we were too weak. It is our disgrace and a blotch on our history. But we can return it to ourselves, and return it we must.
Holding senior civil servants to account over the Post Office scandal. As you can tell, I am losing my patience with how decent taxpaying British men and women are continually treated like dirt by an establishment that hates them.
Mohammed Abid gave the Manchester Airport attackers Afazz and Amaad a character reference in his role of GMP cop, even though he was their brother. It was read to the jury.
What the jury were NOT told is that Abid had been suspended for GROSS MISCONDUCT - this was withheld.
When the rotten, complicit, frightened state wants to protect itself from public anger it acts with lightning speed. 👇
See Lucy Connolly denied her full legal rights after the Southport massacre to be made an example of.
Two-tier justice is now too blatant to ignore.
⚠️ We are appealing for the public’s help to trace a teenage girl who has gone missing from #Watford.
Maya, aged 14, was last seen yesterday morning (Wednesday 3 June) at her home address.
She is described as being approximately 5ft 2ins tall and of slim build with long hair dyed red and brown eyes.
Maya was last seen wearing a Superdry bomber jacket, a navy-coloured jumper and black trousers.
Officers are growing increasingly concerned for her welfare.
Please repost
Seems a new unchecked trick for these foreigners is to randomly stop for young women on nights out posing as taxi drivers , please SHARE TO MAKE AWARE ! These are dangerous men predators looking to pick up white women be vigilant
The BBC’s decision to deliberately exclude Restore Britain from the Makerfield Question Time tonight is the most outrageous example of BBC bias I have ever witnessed.