Michael Hunter

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@SeanMonk02 @BillSimmons The put their thumb on the scale. It wasn’t enough to throw the balance the other way.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@LoamAndLight @ZoeJardiniere I believe in the logic of the AWFL, Musk owning a media which doesn’t directly curate a fictional rainbow world where all bad behavior by sacred minorities must be hidden and/or reframed is the sin.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ColonelTowner If those trying to prevent a rainbow nations are revolutionary, doesn’t that necessarily admit that the government is captured by those whose objective is to implement a rainbow nation? Quiet part out loud by inference.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@DavidFrost95 @Cernovich Bright people understand the exceptions are built in and speak at a higher level. Midwits insist on pointing out that which is obvious to the grown ups.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ConceptualJames It’s like at any time, some guy you enjoyed can just make up an overly broad slur trying to group you as an anti-war, small government believer with white identitarian. Could you imagine the depravity of such a person?

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@Cernovich “The Rich” has always meant “anyone with more than me” to people at all wealth levels.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@jeffdeist But if we recognize the friend/enemy distinction and make any attempt to regain some piece of our society, we’ll be called “Woke”. Maybe if we just liberal a little harder and it will all work out?

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ShadowC5 @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein It would be stunning that someone as bright at Colin would make the decision to get jabbed if research thst he had no access to view, but was only summarized by public health officials were entirely discounted. This suggests he trusted it.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

Where does one arrive at this balance of probabilities? Perhaps, TRUSTING claims by public health officials regarding results of studies completed, which didn’t include being able to access the actual studies, data sets and methodologies? How else would one arrive at the decision to take a novel treatment for a virus of unknown origin never tested against blocking transmission?

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

That is my point. Which is why those empirical thinkers who aren’t part of a coercive power structure need to be skeptical and questioning of those in the system. Making sure the burden is met to enforce coercion. As this burden was clearly not met during COVID, yes, Colin did default to The Science ™️

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ShadowC5 @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein Were a tyrant using the skin suit of “science” to concrete people, you and Colin would be the empirical thinkers I’d dream of being my watchdog.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@RichardHanania Were it important to know the amount of votes you needed to swing a result, I would think time would help enable making the result believable. Do you see the logic there?

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ShadowC5 @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein Did you factor In this hypothetical scenario that the prosecution is using a monopoly on violence to coerce virtually every citizen to partake in this non-empirical treatment which nearly killed the defense?

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

Limited government can only exist when the people hold the government to limits. No generation did a worse job of this than the Boomers. The “Right” if this era, defined by the neocons/National Review crowd were the safeguards. They not only failed, but spent all their energy policing any actual conservatism. Sorry James/Daily Wire: you are the legacy of their managed decline.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ShadowC5 @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein Yes, it makes perfect sense. If your stated reason for not mentioning an experience is that it lacks rigor, it directly implies that contrary information possesses rigor.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@ShadowC5 @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein I think not mentioning personal experience because it lacked rigor suggests he believed the studies promoting the jab HAD rigor.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

Why did you default to the idea it was safe until proven otherwise? There wasn’t a wealth of publicly available, well done studies that met near that burden. You never asked if they even explored whether it prevented transmission. You “trusted the experts” then played (and continue do) defense for them.

[Michael Hunter @MPHunter12FL]

@joekent16jan19 You know damn well it’s the former.