As someone who gets caught up every 4 years, I find no flaws here. I texted my friends yesterday that it sucked that soccer is done for 4 more years. See you in 2030, soccer!
A funeral for a friend of 35+ years is today. There's a gofundme that's short of it's goal. I know I have 0 reach, but he was a huge @celtics fan and his 2 favorite players ever were @paulpierce34 and @FCHWPO . https://t.co/F4b2uYvOUa
Any help would be appreciated
I never thought comparing Playstation to the Lorax would work so perfectly.
Really bums me out to see and hear what's going on. But we don't owe companies anything, they need consumers and should respect their opinions. Not ignore them and treat them like a statistic.
If you were born in America, you’re an American. You have a right to live here. Unless of course you’re American. In which case you’re living on stolen land.
John Lennon wrote a beautiful song about socialism.
“Imagine no possessions” he told us.
He also:
– helped write his band’s anti-tax anthem, Taxman
– incorporated his IP holdings
– moved to a lower-tax country
– fiercely protected his royalties
- drove two Rolls Royce’s and had multiple luxury homes.
– made sure even the royalty cheques for Imagine were kept safe for his estate so his family would remain wealthy in perpetuity.
If he believed it, he’d have lived it. The trouble with socialism is that even the people who love the idea won’t run the experiment on themselves.
John Lennon writing Imagine while owning two Rolls Royce Phantoms and later having a law suit to protect his royalties tells you all you need to know about socialism in practice.
It doesn’t work outside of the imagination.
Ex-Blockbuster employee here. And I mean it with 100% sincerity that the world would be a better place if we shut down all streaming services, re-opened Blockbusters and video stores worldwide, and shoved people back out into the world to find and enjoy their entertainment.
Politicians openly admit that taxing cigarettes, gas, or alcohol is meant to reduce consumption. They understand perfectly well that higher costs discourage behavior.
But when it comes to taxing income, that basic logic suddenly disappears. They pretend people will keep working, investing, and taking risks at the same rate while receiving less of the reward.
You can’t have it both ways.
If taxes discourage behavior, income taxes discourage earning.
If incentives matter for consumption, they matter for production.
This isn’t ignorance. It’s convenience.
They understand incentives when it supports control, and deny them when it exposes the cost of punishing work and success.
If the government allows for astronomical corruption and mismanagement to take place, are they not in any way responsible to refund the taxpayers? In other words, are there no repercussions for stealing people's hard-earned money other than voting the corruption enablers out of office? Having to refund taxpayers would force the government to curb spending in order to repay its populace. It's as though the cause-effect relationship would be restored.