двоглед

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@mladen_mrdalj OMG, you’re as retarded as you look.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@dmontetheno1 Just the audio?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@ShaykhIshraq Where to read?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@ShaykhIshraq @DanielABeck9
Didn't you mention that a paper on this was supposed to be coming out soon that would finally settle the issue?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@GabrielSaidR @shahanSean What is it with conservatives fetishization of historicist architecture and their refusal to study the history of modern architecture?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@FranseviEfendi Decline defined by whom? The Sublime Porte and its administrative elements? The local elites? The average peasant?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@Rurouni_Phoenix With all due respect, I find your subreddit very helpful. However, it was founded, at least in part, on apologetic motivations, which leaves a somewhat bitter aftertaste.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@Rashiq__Shahzad And Montgomery was probably right. See Saqib Hussain’s article on Surah Najm.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@Terodotus @IraniRoxanna Finally!

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@dmontetheno1 That said, he does include their response to Shoemaker in the bibliography. If I'm not mistaken.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@dmontetheno1 As someone pointed out on reddit, dismissing Görke and Schoeler simply by citing Shoemaker’s critique, which they themselves responded to, is kind of… meh. But I guess it comes down to methodology. Declaring everything literary fiction is easier.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@suljagicemir1 Суљага, теби треба више терапије.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@dmontetheno1 by “uncharitable,” you mean…?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@DerMenschensohn Was ist deine Vermutung?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@dmontetheno1 https://t.co/Cv8MWS9eaS

[Boxy @Boxy_FT]

The Charlie Kirk messainic movement started shortly after his death. We're not sure who wrote the Gospel of Erika and the Gospel of Candace, but they seem to be based on an earlier lost source scholars call the "Flickering Light source"

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@MuslimAcademic @Deenresponds Not trying to be disrespectful, but you are an atheist. You just don’t know it yet.

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@kizilfatma @osman_abdigamid But wasn’t he involved as a peer reviewer and acknowledged in the foreword? What was his peer review worth then?

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@Rurouni_Phoenix https://t.co/KcZvC4B8Pm

[двоглед @M_m57724]

@Terodotus @AkyolinEnglish @IraniRoxanna China, mass surveillance and state overreach. You can tell which institute was involved in the publication. The book seems more like an argument for liberalism than an Islamic articulation of religious freedom in the modern world.