@polmplm@TNTJohn1717 Good grief. Of course you're going to see a circular shape against a black background, regardless of how much of the surface is in sight. Can your spacial intelligent actually be so poor?
@polmplm@TNTJohn1717 The original poster has now blocked me. It always amazes me how insecure these "truth seekers" become the moment you pick holes in their nonsense π
@polmplm@TNTJohn1717 My point is that you don't see half of the earth. You see less than half, especially from a vantage point close to the surface. Look at the second sketch above. The visible area is much less than half of the total surface.
@noblebutts@universal_sci The universe has been expanding during those 13 billion years, with 47 billion light years being the estimated *current* size of the visible universe.
@SoklaskiAbraham @ChamaChaViwanda @stem_feed What lovely punctuation. Your writing flows like poetry.
Look, why not look up what 'scientific theory' actually means. Then you'll realise that "why is gravity still a theory?" is a nonsense question which just exposes your ignorance.
@noobsville2@stem_feed Oh I get it, you're one of those "free thinkers" are you?
Any other different ideas you feel like sharing? Don't worry about sounding stupid because that ship has already sailed.
@SoklaskiAbraham @ChamaChaViwanda @stem_feed Just because you can't understand something simple doesn't mean some huge deception is behind it. Try not to be so paranoid.
A legendary experiment on the moon, a hammer and feather dropped from the same height, reach the lunar surface simultaneously without air resistance, all objects fall at the same rate (regardless of mass) as predicted by Galileo, over 400 years earlier.