Too Many Marys

I talk about the intersection of history, religion, and current events. Because everything is religious--even if you don't realize it.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@Acts17David has issued the #MaleekChallenge because of Maleek threatening his family. My modest contribution.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@zarahussain999 You need to go home.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@MasterMaliq The marriage of an Arab woman to a black man humiliates her according to Islamic law. The inferiority of blacks below all races and the superiority of Arabs is baked in lol. The ugliest, most worthless person Muhammad could think of would be a black lame man, he said.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@Aynoniii The flood caused the salvation of infants who would have grown up to be damned.

Everyone else who died was left in the harrowing of Hell: that is, Jesus WAS the salvation for the dead, but not one of the competent adults qualified.

Right now, you're damned post-Jesus.

HTH.

[Lauren Chen @TheLaurenChen]

By this logic it would be legal to kill illegal immigrants who don't have birth certificates

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@RichardDawkins This is your fault. You, who can't even tell whether an ego-stroking chat bot is conscious.

[leekern @leekern13]

The reason why muslims cut off your head is because the Koran tells them to

It isn’t random

It explicitly tells muslims to strike at the necks of non-muslims

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@MrBrendanCox What would Muhammad say about it? Oh, yeah, we know. He loved it when an old blind man stabbed his nursing slave in the belly so she bled out cuz she criticized Mo.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@MrBrendanCox What would Muhammad say about it? Oh, yeah, we know. He loved it when an old blind man stabbed his nursing slave in the belly so she bled out cuz she criticized Mo.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@CENTCOM Proportion, in a multiplicative fashion is the only language the regime understands.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@Kryptotajeer Oooooh my goodness lol.

The Angel who bore the name Yahweh and would not forgive them if they trangressed him in the Exodus is the Son.

This is hilarious.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

I mean, I've been calling it a Voltron god, but yes. The 3D aspects are transparently true of the Athari/Salafi god, but the wider criticism is true of ALL Sunni aqidas. You guys have a Lego god, mate.

[Khalil Andani, PhD @KhalilAndani]

Libyano @muslimorthodoxy , how do you even have an undergrad when you make arguments like this? In 2020 when I got my PhD, you were still in high school.

You aren't defending Islamic monotheism. You are defending an arbitrary, mathematically measurable idol as your God. For all the counter-Christian apologetics you may do well, your own Salafi theology of God qua Megazord is your Achilles heel. Every person (ex Christian, ex-atheist) who takes their Shahada at your hand will eventually discover and then disown your theology.

1) You admit your God has parts and then you contradict yourself and say He is self-dependent. God can only be "self-dependent", i.e. necessary in Himself if He is absolutely simple. Parts are not identical to the whole and are lesser than the whole. This means your God is dependent upon proper parts (each of which is not identical to Him), making His parts more fundamental than Himself. This is not "self-dependence" at all. That would be like saying my iPhone is self-dependent because it depends on its own internal parts.

The problem is that you want to talk about parts having semantic priority over the whole but not ontological priority. This is a big blunder. There is no such thing as semantic priority in ontology. Ontological priority cannot run both ways unless you have vicious circularity between God and His parts in which case something more fundamental must ground both.

2) The 3D Problem: Everything you say means God is 3D. You don't have to grant it as you already conceded it. If God is a 3D body, He is arbitrarily limited—why 3 dimensions and not any other finite number? Furthermore, His extension in the 6 directions of space is arbitrarily limited in at least two directions (up and down). Do you say God's extension is infinite in terms of right, left, front, and back? Or does He have Hudud (limits) in all 6 directions? Anything with such arbitrary boundaries requires an external Specifier (Mukhassis). If you want to avoid this, then you must show how God's essence logically entails his 3 dimensionality, plus his limits on both directions, etc.

3) You claim a boundary is just a "relation" due to creation. False. A boundary defining where a 3D body stops extending is due to the intrinsic geometry of the entity. The boundary on God's upward extension and downward extension would exist without creation. So you need to show why it is necessary or else there must be a Specifier for God's finite extension.

Anything with a finite, specific spatial magnitude mathematically requires an external Specifier (Mukhassis) to determine its exact dimensions out of infinite possibilities.

4) Brute Facts: Once you accept brute facts to explain these limits, you concede that God is constituted by brute facts. You just gave the game away to any atheist, priority monist, or pantheist—all of whom can now argue that the Cosmos or its portions are brute facts without ontological explanations. You can no longer logically argue against atheism.

5) Aseity and modal collapse: If God necessarily creates the world, it does not follow that God depends upon the world. Even if the world is necessary - it is necessary due to another while God is necessary in Himself. There is no modal collapse in ontology, only in modern modal logic which is overly broad anyway.

The world depends upon God and lacks aseity; it is the necessary consequence of God's a se reality, not the cause of it. You are confusing counter-factual dependence (which can run both ways - symmetrically) with ontological dependence (which is strictly one-way). Arguing that a cause that necessarily produces ots effect is therefore dependent upon the same effect to exist is logically unwarranted.

Furthermore, this rebounds against you: If God does not necessarily create, then for creation to occur, your God needs to acquire something extrinsic to Himself to create—this compromises God's aseity for you. Even in your own view, God necessarily actualizes a contingent state of affairs (e.g., choosing "no creation" is a contingent choice of your God). You cannot escape necessity in God's will.

[KontraRevolucija ✝️🇻🇦 @KontrRevolucija]

They know the cope is collapsing.

We know the cope is collapsing.

They know we know the cope is collapsing.

Islam doesn’t possess arguments, it runs on over-confidence pantomimes and deception.

[KontraRevolucija ✝️🇻🇦 @KontrRevolucija]

When the mask slips: 😂

To Christians: 'Islam will DOMINATE the earth! You've been defeated by the power of dawah' 💪

To fellow Muslims: 'We SUCK bro… Dawah has sucked for a long time.' 😭

More below 👇

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@lasciavivere1 This is why the Crusades happened in the first place. Are Muslims such poor learners?

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

And Lybby's answers are TERRIBLE

[Jai @JaiNDoC_RL]

Libyano Just Admitted His Inbox is Full of …

[InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones @InspiringPhilos]

Apparently, raping a child is a good thing in Islam.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@muslimorthodoxy Nah, I thoroughly expect you to be the kind of person who goes to hell because you hate God. I just hope you defy my expectations and pray for you anyway.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@LowStudies @JaiNDoC_RL It is absolutely WILD for you to post some AI vomit that implies that a belief in the Trinity and the deity of Christ is a Protestant distinctive.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@Master_Debunker @RealShahriqKhan @IjazTheTrini Why are you just straight up lying? Lol. There are differences in the text AND differences in recitation. Recitation styles differ, and pronunciation does NOT match the written form of the text for the most popular Hafs tajweed.

[Too Many Marys @ManyMarys]

@shipoast @RealShahriqKhan @IjazTheTrini Actually we do have a ton of variants. Which makes this even dumber.