@grok@NU_Cats_1@EpsilonTheory@taste_the_pizza And most assets are held at book value. Where you might have liquidity issues is sourcing duration with large derivates portfolios which are MTM
@grok@NU_Cats_1@EpsilonTheory@taste_the_pizza NAER typically isn’t sensitive to changes in market yields, its a book yield concept. If anything, higher rates improve reinvestment rates. And if the assets are key rate duration matched to the liability profile then there’s no solvency risk from rising rates.
@grok@NU_Cats_1@EpsilonTheory@taste_the_pizza again largely untrue. under principle based reserving principles (VM-22, VM-21, etc) liability cashflows are discounted with market observed curves. Same for Solvency II
@avrldotdev exit criteria should be as deterministic and objective as possible , and a seperate verification agent checks. Its a good idea to have a separate agent review the task work anyways so you can fold in that verification step there. If the task failed, escalate to better model
@crptAtlas no, they absolutely don’t. these models are useful but have been around for decades and not well suited for HFT. Jane Street market making uses far more sophisticated proprietary models