Mark Furnish

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

Ok. I still recommend doing it. If their is AI that cuts out the music they will still need to run it on the AI program. And it cuts out some of the audio. Not perfect. Assuming what you say is true. Everytime I ask for an example no one ever provides it.

I still recommend doing that. But good idea. Play a movie. Keep that AI guessing. They have an absolute right to film no expectation on privacy in public. But they want people to get upset. I never see a post where people come up and thank the person filming or one where they are ignored.

So play the music. Let them run it through the “AI program”. Doesn’t have to be copyrighted music. It can be a movie or an audio book. Have the “AI program” and the person posting work for their right to film. Sound good friend?

(And thank you for the tip. Just as easy to play a soundtrack of a movie as it is music. Brilliant!!)

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@saffant @Ctausch9 @ChaosTV Agreed. But sometimes life happens. I just propose a way to mitigate instead of falling into their trap of pushing your buttons. Not insisting. If you want to fight and get in their face that is your right. Just be careful.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@black_bukowski @Mappy6984 Your choice to appear on social media being labeled as a first amendment denier. Your right.

I am just telling you what I would do to mitigate the interaction and ways to take away their incentives to push your buttons.

But by all means do what you want. Fight the good fight.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

The filming is protected. The speech may be to. Depends on if you are inciting. I agree it isn’t shitty behavior. My advice is a way to mitigate the annoyance. Take it or leave it.

I would suggest not inciting violence on these people. You give them the satisfaction and likely put yourself in legal trouble. Tons of videos proving this point.

For your objection, I suggest writing to your lawmakers for stricter laws. Or work on a constitutional amendment. Good luck with that.

My advice is a band aid to get around certain, specific situations.

Be careful out there!

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

I see the problem for the person being harassed. But that is not what these people are doing. They are enjoying using their legal right to film in public for the joy of having someone complain so they can post it on thier social media.

It is not a cure all solution. Just a mitigation strategy for that particular issue.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@black_bukowski @Mappy6984 I would blast copyrighted music to deter your incentive to post my (wrongful) protest of you legally filming my house to deter you from posting on social media!!

I would even let you pick your favorite music!!

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

Ok. I am a moron. Do not play copyrighted music next time. Just yell at them. Then they will post in on social media showing you are ignorant of the law.

No skin off my back either way. Do not say I didn’t give you a tip to mitigate the damage and take the high road by defending their legal right while protecting yours.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@Mappy6984 Curious. Who has tried this?

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

He has an absolute right to film. No expectation of privacy when they film on a public sidewalk.

Next time play copyrighted music. He will have the right to film as his right.

However posting on social media the sound will be muted due to the copyrighted music.

Both sides get a fair shake that way. A video with no sound.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@vanicewinlaw99 @TNTransparency Go Habs Go!

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@Breaking57 This was a stupid vs stupid fight. Idiot should have removed his hat. But the judge is a little power trippy about “dignity” of court by wearing a hat. More ego. On both sides.

Waste of time and resources.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

These sovereign citizen arguments are absolutely goofy. Has this ever worked? One time? Where do people learn this nonsense?

At the same time I think this judge in an attempt to be witty fell into this man’s terminology and distinctions which could come back to bite him since he is now on record acknowledging these various distinctions.

He should have just cut off the discussion.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@ProjectConstitu That look is one of disdain.

(for the public. Everyone is ruining her rightful ascension to the throne)

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@LionelMedia Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@Acyn Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@InterstellarUAP I am starting to believe that the only positive thing coming out of this government “disclosure” is that these talking heads continue to remain relevant. Good for tv exposure and their book sales. And Steven Spielberg gets great attention for his movie.

What am I missing?

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@LePapillonBlu2 Why would you name the judge, post his picture and give his credentials and his wife — outlining what they are being accused of?

You just added gasoline to a dumpster fire.

[Mark Furnish @MarkWFurnish]

@neotenyx2 @InterstellarUAP