Economically literate, pro-freedom people generally aren’t “worshipping billionaires.” They’re defending individual rights.
Respecting someone’s right to keep what they earned isn’t idolization. Voluntary trade isn’t “taking from you” just because someone else became rich.
The obsession with demonizing the rich and using state power against them isn’t necessarily about helping the poor. The dangerous principle it establishes is that your property, and ultimately your life, is yours only until enough people decide they have a better claim to it.
Defending a billionaire’s rights is defending the same principle that protects yours.
Communists killed this guy in front of an audience of college kids and then made videos laughing and celebrating. Well, its been almost one year now, they're still celebrating, still laughing, still making jokes. Nothing changed. We had a window as Sam Hyde and others said, of about 2-3 weeks after he was killed to crush the Left forever. We had a mandate to do anything, to jail all these freaks and destroy their patronage networks. And here we are, one year on, communist candidates being elected, Hasan bigger than ever, almost no one in jail, and the Right is completely fractured. I quoted this video specifically because its important to remember the human cost here, not only do these kids have to grow up without a dad, the only way they'll know him is through memes making fun of his public execution.
🔴Según informe de Eco Go, desde 2003 el BCRA le pasó al Tesoro el equivalente a US$301.200 millones a través de adelantos, utilidades, letras intransferibles y compras de títulos: de ese total, Néstor, Cristina y Alberto concentraron el 91% (US$274.700 millones)
📌Cuánto usó cada uno
🔹 Alberto Fernández: US$118.700 millones (el más alto).
🔹 CFK segundo mandato: US$104.900 millones.
🔹 CFK primer mandato: US$35.800 millones.
🔹 Néstor Kirchner: US$15.300 millones.
🔹Macri usó US$27.800 millones.
🔹Milei es el único con saldo negativo: -1.300 millones de dólares. En la práctica, el Tesoro le devolvió plata al Central en lugar de pedir más.
🔹El dato aparece en medio del debate por la reforma del BCRA que busca eliminar por completo esa práctica.
https://t.co/Upo7IxdFjK
Sobrio, prolijo, disciplinado, templado
Tenía una misión y la cumplió a la perfeccion. Sin frustrarse, sin calentarse, sin patotear
Corre, marca, deja la vida. Le pegan, se levanta. No llora, no se queja. Se lesiona, y sigue igual
Que pedazo de jugador, siempre me encantó.
Discreto e infravalorado, pero no le importa. No juega para la cámara, sino para el equipo
SORTEO RESIDENT EVIL REQUIEM (TARJETA DE STEAM 100 USD)
Requisitos:
- Seguirme (si ganás y no me seguís no vas a ganar el premio)
- Comentar, dar Me gusta y Retweet a este posteo (de esa manera los filtro)
SORTEO VÁLIDO EN TODO EL MUNDO 🌎
SORTEO DE AÑO NUEVO 🥳 (TARJETA DE STEAM 100 USD)
Requisitos:
- Seguirme (si ganás y no me seguís no vas a ganar el premio)
- Comentar, dar Me gusta y Retweet a este posteo (de esa manera los filtro)
SORTEO VÁLIDO EN TODO EL MUNDO 🌎
Here it is, kindergarten level, without the moral sleight of hand.
Rent is something you chose to pay for yourself.
A job is something you chose to accept from someone else.
Those two things are not connected.
Your landlord doesn’t owe you cheaper rent because you’re bad with money.
Your employer doesn’t owe you a higher wage because you want a nicer life.
Wages are not based on what someone needs.
They’re based on what the job is worth and what someone agrees to do it for.
If a business “buys fewer yachts,” no extra money magically appears for wages. That money was never earmarked for you. It belongs to the owner, who took the risk, put up the capital, and might lose everything. Employees don’t share losses, so they don’t get automatic claims on profits either.
If you want more money, you have three options: Get skills that are worth more
Find someone willing to pay more
Start your own business and pay people whatever you think is “fair”
What you don’t get to do is redefine someone else’s success as your entitlement.
“Buy fewer lattes” is advice about your choices.
“Buy fewer yachts” is a demand about someone else’s property.
That’s the difference.
SORTEO NAVIDEÑO 🎄🎅 (TARJETA DE STEAM 100 USD)
Requisitos:
- Seguirme (si ganás y no me seguís no vas a ganar el premio)
- Comentar, dar Me gusta y Retweet a este posteo (de esa manera los filtro)
SORTEO VÁLIDO EN TODO EL MUNDO 🌎
Capitalism doesn’t assume humans aren’t greedy. It assumes they are and refuses to give them power over others.
That’s the point.
Greed under capitalism is constrained by consent. You only get richer by offering something others voluntarily choose to pay for. If you stop providing value, the money stops.
Greed under collectivism is unconstrained. It’s backed by force. You get resources whether you create value or not, so long as you can moralize need or capture political power.
Also, capitalism doesn’t pit competition against cooperation. Competition is how we discover who can cooperate best. Every successful business is a massive act of cooperation with customers, workers, suppliers, and investors. It just isn’t coerced cooperation.
And the claim that capitalists never give back is empirically false. Private charity, philanthropy, reinvestment, and voluntary aid explode under capitalist systems and collapse under socialist ones.
What you’re really saying is this:
You don’t trust individuals to choose generosity. You trust the state to enforce it.
That isn’t moral. It’s just replacing voluntary cooperation with compulsory obedience.
SORTEO HALF LIFE 3 (TARJETA DE STEAM 100 USD)
Requisitos:
- Seguirme (si ganás y no me seguís no vas a ganar el premio)
- Comentar, dar Me gusta y Retweet a este posteo (de esa manera los filtro)
EL GANADOR LO ANUNCIO MAÑANA POR LA TARDE
SORTEO VÁLIDO EN TODO EL MUNDO 🌎