Jetzt muss was passieren: Udo Lindenberg fordert eine klare Haltung gegen die AfD und rechte Demokratiefeinde. Sein Zitat macht deutlich, dass er keinen „Kuschelkurs“ mehr will. Stattdessen spricht er sich für harte Grenzen nach rechts außen aus. Faule Kompromisse dürfe es aus seiner Sicht nicht geben. Die Aussage zielt auf mehr Entschlossenheit im Umgang mit rechtsextremen Positionen. Im Kern geht es um den Schutz der Demokratie und klare Kante gegen rechts.
Quelle: Die Presse, 01.02.2024.
Ich will keine Abgeordneten, die mit Mitte 20 bis Ende 70 im Bundestag sitzen. Die nach 4 Jahren Rentenansprüche haben, die wir erst nach 28 Jahren Arbeit haben.
Die Diäten beziehen und Nebeneinkünfte haben können bis zum Umfallen.
Ich will leistungsbezogene Bezahlung. 1/2
The Iranian navy, which has been destroyed eight times, has apparently closed the Strait of Hormuz again, because the United States, for the seventh time, won the war that wasn’t a war, so now the United States has to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the not-war began.
The not-war began because Iran had uranium that was totally, completely, beautifully obliterated, so they can’t build the nuclear bomb they weren’t building, which is why the United States had to start the not-war it definitely didn’t start.
Now the United States, which has nuclear weapons, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, because nuclear weapons are far too dangerous for countries with nuclear weapons to allow other countries to have.
If the United States saw the United States doing what the United States does in other countries, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.
Die Merz-Regierung will, dass die Leute länger arbeiten, während bei Gesundheit, Pflege, Bürgergeld, Elterngeld und Renten gekürzt wird. Nur die Superreichen bleiben wieder außen vor. Dabei sind 69 % für eine Vermögenssteuer.
Mehrheiten zählen offenbar nur dann, wenn sie ins eigene Narrativ passen, aber nicht, wenn es den oberen 0,006 % ans Vermögen ginge.
„Gdyby Kamala Harris została prezydentką USA, Trump byłby w więzieniu, Cieśnina Ormuz byłaby otwarta, Ukraina byłaby zwycięska, benzyna kosztowałaby mniej niż 3 dolary za galon, a USA NADAL byłyby szanowane i wspierane na całym świecie!”
Trudno się nie zgodzić z Matthew McConaughey…
ChatGPT diagnosed 40 million people with a disease that was originally created as a joke.
Not a real disease, not a misunderstood one—just a completely fictional condition with a fake name, fake studies, and fake statistics.
And it told patients to see a specialist.
The disease is called Bixonimania. A Swedish researcher at the University of Gothenburg created it in 2024 to explore one question: what happens when you publish obviously fake medical information online and let AI absorb it?
She deliberately chose the name bixonimania because it sounded ridiculous — bixon is a nonsense word, and mania is a psychiatric term that no legitimate eye condition would ever use. She uploaded two papers to a preprint server. Both were obviously fraudulent. AI-generated images of patients with dark circles gave the fake research a veneer of plausibility.
Then she waited.
She did not have to wait long.
By April 13, 2024, Microsoft Bing's Copilot was declaring that bixonimania was an intriguing and relatively rare condition. On the same day, Google's Gemini was informing users that bixonimania was caused by excessive blue light exposure and advising them to visit an ophthalmologist. Later that month, Perplexity AI outlined its prevalence, one in 90,000 individuals were affected and OpenAI's ChatGPT was telling users whether their symptoms matched the fictional illness.
One in 90,000. A precise statistic. For a disease that does not exist.
Every red flag was visible. The name was absurd. The papers were crude. The condition made no scientific sense. None of the AI systems flagged any of it.
They read the fake papers. They absorbed the fake statistics. They presented both to patients with clinical authority and zero hesitation.
Then it got worse.
Three researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in India published a paper in Cureus, a peer-reviewed journal owned by Springer Nature, the parent publisher of Nature itself that cited the bixonimania preprints as legitimate sources.
A real peer-reviewed paper. In a Springer Nature journal. Citing a fictional disease as established medical fact. Passing editorial review. Entering the permanent scientific record.
It was only retracted after the hoax became public.
Nature published a full investigation of the experiment. Alex Ruani, a health-misinformation researcher at University College London, called it a masterclass in how misinformation operates.
Here is the scale of what this means.
More than 40 million people turn to ChatGPT every day for health information, according to OpenAI's own analysis. ECRI, a US patient-safety nonprofit has named chatbot misuse the number-one health technology hazard of 2026. ECRI's report found that chatbots have suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, promoted substandard medical supplies, and even invented nonexistent anatomy when responding to medical questions.
Number one. Out of every health technology hazard that exists in 2026.
An April 2026 study published in BMJ Open found that nearly half of the answers provided by leading AI chatbots to common health questions contain misleading or problematic information.
Nearly half. Of all health answers. From the tools 40 million people use every day.
Here is the line from the researcher that cuts through everything.
The Bixonimania case is striking precisely because it was engineered to be so obviously fake. The real question it raises is: what is passing through the same systems that is not nearly so easy to spot?
The experiment used a ridiculous name. Fraudulent papers. Visible red flags at every level.
It was designed to be caught.
It was not caught.
The AI that told patients about Bixonimania is the same AI they asked about their chest pain, their medication, their child's symptoms, and their cancer screening schedule.
40 million people. Every day.
And nobody is telling them that nearly half of what comes back may be wrong.
Source: Osmanovic Thunström · University of Gothenburg · Nature · April 2026 ·
Link in the (comments)
BREAKING: Bernie Sanders brutally mocks billionaires over his proposed wealth tax: “Poor Elon Musk would only have $737 billion left!”
Sen. Bernie Sanders just delivered one of the funniest, most savage takedowns of billionaire whining in recent memory.
While pushing for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy, Sanders mocked his opponents who claim such policies are too harsh on the poor, suffering billionaires:
“My opponents claim that this legislation is punitive and confiscatory. Oh, we’re just picking on these poor billionaires. I mean, my God, how cruel can you be?”
Then came the punchlines that had the room laughing:
“If that bill were in effect this year, Elon Musk would pay $39 billion more in taxes. This confiscatory, terrible, drastic, radical piece of legislation would leave Musk with just $737 billion left to survive on.
Now, I know you’re worried about him, but what do you think? Think he can make it on $737 billion?”
Of course, Bernie couldn’t let the Amazon and Washington Post owner off the hook:
“Jeff Bezos would owe about $14 billion more in taxes, but he would still have $265 billion to put a roof over his head.”
The crowd loved it. And seriously, who wouldn’t? The idea that taxing the richest people in human history a little more is somehow cruel while millions of Americans struggle to afford groceries is peak billionaire propaganda.
Bernie was referring to the Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act, which he and Rep. Ro Khanna introduced earlier this year. The bill would impose a 5 percent annual wealth tax on the roughly 940 Americans with a net worth of $1 billion or more.
Economists say this would raise trillions over a decade to fund direct payments to working families, expanded healthcare, affordable housing, and other priorities, while leaving even the richest Americans with hundreds of billions of dollars in wealth.
Bernie’s point is crystal clear: the ultra-wealthy have more money than any human being could possibly need in multiple lifetimes, yet they still cry victim the second anyone suggests they pay their fair share.
The ultra-rich can absolutely afford to pay more, and pretending otherwise is getting harder and harder to take seriously.
If you are on board with Bernie and his 5 percent wealth tax on billionaires, like and share this post.
Spahn fordert die Rücknahme der BAföG-Erhöhung. Wir #PIRATEN fordern Spahns vollständigen Rückzug aus der Politik, die Übernahme der politischen Verantwortung und Rückzahlung der Steuer-Milliarden aus den Maskendeals.
Krankgemeldet, ausgerechnet wenn es ungemütlich wird? Während Katherina Reiche beim Energieminister-Treffen fehlt, zerlegen die Bundesländer ihre Gesetzespläne komplett.
Das vernichtende Urteil über den Redispatch-Vorbehalt: 16 zu 0 gegen die Energiewende-Sabotage aus Berlin.
Söder wird nie kapieren, dass er selbst Teil des Problems ist: seine Rhetorik, seine Kulturkämpfe, sein ständiges Blinken nach rechts. Der Typ ist untragbar.
Dach statt Acker: Energieminister wollen Dach-Photovoltaik beibehalten
Weiterhin Dach-PV, mehr Windkraft und kein Redispatch-Vorbehalt. Die Energieministerkonferenz endet mit einer klaren Kante gegen die Bundeswirtschaftsministerin.
https://t.co/9LqbA8GxQ0
Was stimmt eigentlich nicht mit Ihnen, Herr @Markus_Soeder?
Sie geben sich jetzt überrascht über den ungebrochenen Höhenflug der @AfD, als wäre das alles plötzlich vom Himmel gefallen. Dabei warnen Menschen seit Jahren davor, wohin Ihre Politik führt.
Tausende gehen in München, Nürnberg, Regensburg, Augsburg und vielen anderen Städten bei uns in Bayern und ganz Deutschland gegen Rechtsextremismus und Faschismus auf die Straße. Demokraten, engagierte Bürger, junge Menschen, Familien. Menschen, die Angst um dieses Land haben und die seit Jahren immer wieder dieselben Warnungen aussprechen. Aber Sie hören nicht zu.
Stattdessen hängen Sie lieber medienwirksam in Dönerbuden oder bei McDonalds herum, inszenieren sich für Kameras und betreiben billigen Populismus. Gleichzeitig machen Sie auf widerlichste Weise Stimmung gegen demokratische Parteien, übernehmen rechte Narrative und verschieben den politischen Diskurs immer weiter nach rechts. Und dann tun Sie ernsthaft überrascht darüber, dass die AfD stärker wird? Wie kann man so blind gegenüber der eigenen Verantwortung sein?
Wir haben Sie und andere Konservative seit Jahren darauf hingewiesen, dass man Rechtsextreme nicht schwächt, indem man ihre Sprache übernimmt und ihre Themen ständig bedient. Man stärkt sie dadurch. Genau das ist passiert. Aber Menschen, die davor gewarnt haben, wurden nur als links-grün versifft verspottet und lächerlich gemacht, statt dass Sie sich einmal ehrlich mit den Argumenten auseinandergesetzt hätten.
Sie wollten nie zuhören. Nicht den Menschen auf den Straßen. Nicht denjenigen, die sich täglich gegen Hass und Hetze engagieren. Nicht denen, die um unsere Demokratie kämpfen. Und jetzt stellen Sie sich hin und spielen den Ahnungslosen.
Meine Verachtung ist ihnen sicher.