WTF: Mind reading is here.
Researchers invented a new #AI method to convert brain signals into video. See the results for yourself
Published in Nature yesterday: https://t.co/K4gzZ7WlRw
What are the implications? Is this the biggest paper of 2023?
#CEBRA
Armadillos collect leaf litter they use to build nests in their burrows. Because of the specific armadillo's body shape, the animal opts for bunching a pile of leaves up against their abdomens and hopping backwards toward their nest
https://t.co/oRZkPHlB27
Stablecoin legislation has been drafted in Congress
I read the bill.
TL;DR decentralized stables become illegal in the US (DAI, LUSD, RAI, etc. become illegal🚨) while centralized stables, defi, Ethereum, and ETH win big.
High-level summary⬇️
- decentralized stables become illegal in the US. DAI, LUSD, RAI etc.
- foreign stables become illegal in the US. National boundaries for stables
- imo ETH sees significant uptake as a payment method that's both legal and decentralized
- licensed stables, eg. USDC, become huge winners and permitted to access Fed accounts directly
Full summary⬇️
1. The Act makes it illegal to offer unlicensed stablecoins in the US, with a maximum fine of $1M and of 5 years in prison. The Act is specific that this applies globally. Their definition of "stablecoin" is very broad and includes DAI, LUSD, floating stables like RAI, and even includes exotic quasi-stables as long as they are designed to be redeemable for a relatively fixed amount of "monetary value", including all fiat currencies.
For example, this act makes it illegal to build DAI in America, illegal to send DAI to an American business or person living in the US, and illegal for foreign-licensed or unlicensed stablecoins to be offered to Americans in any way.
Essentially, this bill draws national borders around stables by making decentralized stables and foreign-licensed stables illegal in America.
imo the illegalization of unlicensed and foreign stables seems likely to greatly benefit the uptake of non-stable payment tokens, especially ETH.
2. The Act makes the stablecoin licensing process structured but ultimately discretionary. They decide who gets to issue licensed stables.
3. Allows stables to be collateralized by insured deposits in some cases. Could perhaps cause deposit tokens to fall under this regulation as "stablecoins backed by bank deposits".
4. Gives stable operators direct access to the Federal Reserve. Eg. Circle could have accounts at the Fed.
5. Launches an official study on a CBDC. Includes a surprisingly thoughtful list of criteria to study, including the potential impact of a CBDC on the competitive landscape of stablecoins.
6. The Act defines "payment system" broadly in a way that, imo, would include many wallets, bridges, defi, and crypto payment apps. But, the Act does not regulate these payment systems. They aren't banning or licensing defi in this Act.
I'm not a lawyer, and this was my best-effort interpretation of the Act.
Full Act:
https://t.co/vR65M3XayW
Joe Biden doesn’t recognize the little brown guy (Prime Minister of UK) and pushes him away to salute the old white guy. The look on the face of @RishiSunak is priceless 🤣