Speaking on early Soviet Russia @NickSzabo4 reminds us that "in order for communists to get a stranglehold on society they only needed the railroad stations, the handful of radio stations, & newspapers".
Controlling info channels & effectively managing them -> control of reality
@MartyBent 1st thought: I bet they’re both signed by CAA...
Confirmed.
https://t.co/BO50UuPolw
https://t.co/tUKOIni0CQ
If you don’t understand why I’d guess that or how that’s significant spend some time looking into it.
@lopp If Lightning becomes standard for BTC txs of any size... & Paypal, Square, et al create hubs to route these txs so that Bob won’t have to open/close channels w/ Alice & other friends, he just sends thru hubs... how does BTC sustain miner fees LT as block rewards —> 0?
@adam3us Reid Hoffman was in your $21M seed round, correct? & layer 2 “solution” Lightning is funded by David Sacks, right? If the goal of L2 is make BTC usable as money the reply shouldn’t be “Paypal exists”... it should be “Paypal exists, for now”. But that’s not the response, is it?
The reason Bitcoin Core developers always respond this way to the argument that BTC should have lower fees, more Tx capacity, & faster confirmations isn’t really because “decentralization”
It’s because they work for Blockstream, which is funded by Paypal founders & investors. A Bitcoin with those qualities, at scale, would make Paypal worthless.
2/2
We used to say:
"people will be able to send money home to their families for 5 cents"
now we say "keep HODLing for 100k or 1 million"
We used to say let's build something amazing that will create that value and now it's how many people can we get to buy in.
@yanivf@nic_carter I don't disagree one is more probable than the other. But it's interesting how extremists on both sides pretend to know the unknown. "Trust me (No way to verify)".
@nic_carter And if that hashrate came back online within a day or so instead, it would look exactly like what we observed - correct? Whether it's probable or not, how can we rule out that wasn't the case?
@nic_carter It does beg the question: if 30% of BTC hashrate were to go offline for a brief period, what would we observe? What notable differences from what we saw would there be?
@noUpside Not a good look coming from the Director of Research who "wasn't aware" her firm employed Russian disinfo tactics in the Alabama senate race, then pushed fake news about Gabbard being supported by them too https://t.co/WddelqoxNP
@balajis Mobs and elite classes that arise naturally in social spaces may be healthy. The ones being forged here by aX accounts have the most deleterious impacts.
@balajis aX accounts do this by cloaking as a1/pseudonyms, or real names
Twitter's wide distribution includes more inattentive observers, and the mix of real names and pseudonyms helps create the impression to the inattentive observers that all accounts map ~1:1
@twobitidiot Seems to be working as intended:
1) Extract value from our ecosystem while providing none; 2) Set tripwire, exchanges sell to legacy finance or get rekt; 3) Fast-track groups who stuff their ranks w ex-regulators & pay the right people; 4) Make Ben Lawsky a "crypto consultant"