Must force the vote before the midterms — outcome be damned. In 2024, crypto PACs backed candidates purely on their stated position on crypto and still delivered significant results. This time it’s not just rhetoric. This time their vote will either actively advance crypto or actively damage it.
Because the House is out, even if the Senate somehow forced a last-minute vote this week (highly unlikely given the remaining calendar, lack of a scheduled cloture motion, and unresolved ethics issues), the House would not be around to quickly concur or conference any Senate changes until it returns. Multiple reports note the House had previously signaled it could move fast on a clean Senate-passed text, but that is irrelevant while it is in recess.
@Changehero_io@Vivek4real_ This “ban” expires in 2030 at the same time as all 6000+ (existing/under construction/planned) AI data centers are up and running. Combine that with the fact stable coins is merely software that can be “programmed” once the ban expires. Stable coins will become CBDCs.
Please read between the lines and understand what is happening. This “ban” expires in 2030 at the same time as all 6000+ (existing/under construction/planned) AI data centers are up and running. Combine that with the fact stable coins is merely software that can be “programmed” once the ban expires. Stable coins will become CBDCs.
@Stellar_Rippler Don’t you think your post flies in the face of USDC who has long been in the EU market. When you write this shit, it makes you sound kind of dumb.
@Lion20003000@EleanorTerrett The joint SEC-CFTC Letter identifying 16 “digital commodities.” It became apparent to me the “Sweet 16” cryptos were a hedge against the Bill failing. I asked AI and it agreed. So there is always that!