They are actually coming after the cartoonists.
Meanwhile, those that preach "kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …" are handed taxpayer funded grants.
Australia is in big trouble.
🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize for protecting Free Speech.
Simple poll. Please be honest! As of today, how much do you still trust this man?
A. 100 % B. 75%
C. 50% D. 25%
E. 0%
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏
Go
I had to laugh … Jacinta Ardern is now a lecturer at Sydney University.
No, it’s not in equine studies.
She is giving lessons - get this - on compassionate and empathetic leadership and social cohesion.
Consider the ridiculousness of this!
Sadistic, freeloading, cruel bitch
"Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre."
"The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic."
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni@mscott
Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice
Dear Professor Scott,
I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust.
You cannot be serious.
You are quoted as saying:
"Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other."
Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic.
My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government.
While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage.
At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live.
People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later.
Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure.
Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking.
I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable.
And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was.
Kind? For whom?
Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods.
And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support.
The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified.
The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings.
While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive.
Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand.
We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on.
Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them.
And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion?
It is sickening.
Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment?
Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them?
Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand?
I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause.
Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences.
I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do...
But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price.
We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up.
Some of those people will never recover what they lost.
And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy.
What an absolute disgrace.
Yours sincerely,
Alia Bland
Co-founder, Voices for Freedom
New Zealand
Medical reviews" 🤣😂🤣
You poor simple, brainwashed person.
You know, when Orwell was writing about the character Parsons from 1984 - he was referring exactly to people like you …….
"an active man of paralyzing stupidity, a mass of imbecile enthusiasms—one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on whom, more even than on the Thought Police, the stability of the Party depended"
Please go away and try and educate yourself.
Listen to actual doctors who (who risked their careers) and have successfully treated covid patients with Ivermectin. https://t.co/HEhZ4K2rQE
Listen to the real life experiences of Dr. Joseph Varon
https://t.co/8CHGmiTndz
Read Dr. Pierre Kory‘s book ‘The War on Ivermectin’ to learn how to these "medical reviews’ you simplistically refer to were deliberately design to fail.
https://t.co/7WKCngCqA2
And read through the over 100 studies that found Ivermectin worked
https://t.co/HyTmdXk3gh
And here’s the thing.
If you want to remain wallowing in your ignorance and continue to be as ill informed as you currently are - and you’d refuse to take Ivermectin if recommended by your doctor - that’s your free choice. No one wants to force you.
But don’t give aid and comfort to covid criminals who abused human rights and denied sick and dying covid patients the right to try.
@elonmusk@IfindRetards There is something extremely WRONG with the head shapes of these two.
They both look like a perfect fit for inside of a toilet bowl
Elon, I think it's time you sue the shit out of this retard.
“Elon Musk is a white nationalist, who is a Nazi, who does back to back Sieg Heils, who is an untreated drug addict"
@WallStreetMav Yes, that will make it logistically impossible to gather those (say 100 million) shares... Hopefully, eventually, Elon can extend this to ALL the children of the "world"
Mental gymnastics level: Expert.
Elon wants to give the shares 100% directly to the kid.
Critics: “No, run it through the state so 30% goes to admin, 20% to fraud, and 5% maybe reaches them. Anything else is bad.”
In 2021, the head of the UN World Food Programme said $6 billion from Elon Musk could solve world hunger.
Elon replied: publish the plan, right here, publicly, and I'll sell Tesla stock on the spot.
The plan came out. And when you read it, it wasn't a plan to solve hunger. It was one year of food for 42 million people. A twelve-month subscription. And the year after? Start over.
A few months later, Elon summed up his view: if you care about the reality of goodness rather than the perception of it, philanthropy is extremely difficult.
"Reality of goodness over perception of goodness."
That line stuck with me for weeks. Does philanthropy actually work?
Gates-style philanthropy is first and foremost institutional capture. Foundations funding NGOs, funding governments, funding programs, producing reports, producing photos. Everyone's happy, and the aid machine keeps itself alive. Sixty years and hundreds of billions later, much of Africa is still dependent on aid. Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo laid it out in Dead Aid: aid breeds dependency, feeds corruption, and short-circuits the only mechanism that has ever lifted a country out of poverty.
So what actually works?
It's been tested. In Kenya, Berkeley researchers working with GiveDirectly randomly selected villages and gave every poor household about $1,000 in cash. No program. No training. No conditions. Just cash.
The result: people bought metal roofs, livestock, started small businesses. Barely any inflation. And every dollar injected generated around $2.50 of economic activity locally, including for neighbors who received nothing.
Why? Because you didn't give them charity. You gave them capital. You primed the pump.
And that's where everything hinges: ownership. Hernando de Soto showed that the world's poor hold trillions of dollars in assets, but without recognized property titles, it's dead capital. You can't borrow against it, pass it on, or grow it. Where property rights are respected, the system starts running. Where they aren't, no amount of aid will ever be enough.
Now reread Elon's post.
"Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many."
That's not a meal. That's not a handout. That's a property title. A piece of the company building the infrastructure of a multiplanetary civilization, owned directly by millions of kids.
A kid who gets a handout depends on the state. A kid who owns a share of SpaceX owns a piece of the future. He learns what an asset is, he has a stake in the economy working, and one day he'll vote as an owner, not as a client of the state.
Gates buys perception. Musk distributes ownership.
The reality of goodness versus its perception. And it's absolutely brilliant.
🚨BREAKING: The five rapists and murderers driving the pickup truck where Shani Louk was disheveled and unconscious after being gang-raped, with her hair matted with blood and dirt have been successively hunted down globally by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Mossad and executed.
Anika Wells is just a STOOGE for the "Terminator" version of AI.
The people who will drive the "Star Trek Enterprise" version of AI this be ordinary people:
People who want an AI Tutor for their children:s education.
People who want Aged Care for their Parents.
People who want a butler and maid for their house
People who want a squad of laborers for their job
People who want a car for safe travel.
Anika Wells should be shunned from polite society.
She is a danger to Family
She is a danger to Australia
She is a danger to civilization.
The "Terminator" version of AI is being driven by Judges, Government, Police, Bureaucrats, and criminals AND NOT by the ordinary person in the street