Israel doesn’t need to hide its crimes.
Because the U.S. has made sure the world won’t name them.
Genocide becomes "defense."
Ethnic cleansing becomes "evacuation."
Occupation becomes "sovereignty."
And the people trying to survive it all become "the threat."
This is not just propaganda.
It is the architecture of impunity.
@Uncle_Thaps@TshimomolaGK Yeap! That and more strategic fuel oil reserves are needed. China is stocking up on oil and releasing less diesel from its refiniries. When China moves we should pay attention. Zelenzky is bot helping at all with Russia plus the strait of hormone plus the houthis. Chaos
@Uncle_Thaps@TshimomolaGK No wonder these fools tout tourism as being the answer to this massive unemployment. Their plan is to have power from Eskom diverted to data centers, whilst IPPs will power tourism facilities. Meanwhile black people living in townships will be left to endure exorbitant tariffs.
An extraordinary metal sculpture was created by pouring molten aluminum into an invasive fire ant colony.
The resulting cast is massive—measuring 18 inches deep and weighing 17.9 pounds—revealing the intricate subterranean architecture of the colony.
𝘔𝘛𝘕8 𝘊𝘏𝘈𝘔𝘗𝘐𝘖𝘕𝘚 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘊𝘛𝘐𝘖𝘕𝘚 🗣️🏆
Feel the atmosphere from the pitch in Durban, as Hlompho Kekana captures the emotion and hears from the players! 💛
Extended reactions live on YouTube now! 📲 https://t.co/px8HUrnVQL
#Sundowns#MTN8#NeverStopRising
US regime change operations around the world are destroying the lives of ordinary people.
Respect sovereignty.
No nation has the right to intervene in another nation's internal affairs.
Barry Commission (Native Laws and Customs, 1883, chaired by Sir J.D. Barry): Full report at https://t.co/CTBCMc4gip (PDF download available there).
Tomlinson Report (1954/55, ~3755 pages in 17 vols): Full version not freely online/publicly digitized. Official summary (UG 61/1955) exists in libraries; shorter summaries/critiques widely available via academic sites.
This is precisely the kind of historical excavation South Africans need more of, Thokozane. Thank you for pointing us in this direction.
I have started looking into these reports, and the Tomlinson Commission in particular opens an extraordinary intellectual window into the political economy of the South African state.
What fascinates me about documents of this nature is that they force us to move beyond understanding apartheid merely as a collection of racist laws and begin examining it as an extraordinarily elaborate project of statecraft, spatial engineering, labour control, demographic management and economic planning.
The Tomlinson Report is particularly revealing because of the contradiction sitting at its centre. The apartheid state wanted territorial separation, yet the South African economy had already developed profound interdependencies between African labour, white-owned capital, agriculture, mining, industry and the cities.
So the question became: how do you geographically separate populations whose economic lives have already become structurally intertwined?
That is where the report becomes so historically important.
The Commission investigated whether the African reserves could be transformed into economically viable territories capable of sustaining substantially larger populations. Its conclusions effectively exposed the enormous material requirements of making “separate development” economically sustainable: land, capital, agricultural restructuring, industrialisation, employment creation and massive state investment.
And therein lies an extraordinary contradiction.
Apartheid was not simply an ideology of racial separation. It required an entire political economy capable of financing the geography that ideology demanded.
This is why these old commissions matter.
Reports, commissions, census tables, maps, land legislation, railway plans, agricultural policies and labour regulations are not merely bureaucratic debris from history. They are often the architectural drawings of power.
If we want to understand contemporary South Africa properly—our settlement patterns, former homeland economies, labour migration, spatial inequality, land distribution, infrastructure geography and the extraordinary distances millions of workers still travel between places of residence and economic opportunity—we have to study the administrative machinery through which yesterday's political decisions became today's socioeconomic geography.
I am particularly interested in going backwards from Tomlinson into the nineteenth-century commissions you mention, including the Barry Commission. I would appreciate the exact archival title/reference for the 1883 report because I want to distinguish carefully between the report itself, subsequent interpretations of it and the larger historical processes eventually culminating in Union in 1910 and, much later, the Republic in 1961.
There may be a much bigger intellectual project hidden here:
What if we reconstructed South African political economy through the commissions that designed, rationalised and periodically reorganised the state?
Not merely reading what politicians said, but reading what the state studied, measured, mapped, recommended and institutionalised.
Because sometimes history is not hiding in speeches.
Sometimes history is sitting quietly in 3,000 pages of government reports, waiting for somebody to ask the right question.
And perhaps one of those questions should be:
How much of the South Africa we are desperately trying to transform today was administratively designed long before any of us were born?