@BunchesOfStoats@dejardinant He didn't. I wonder how he had the patience to try and explain things to you for so long. I wouldn't have had the patience. You're a fool. Farewell.
@MiddleTNboogie@SomeWelder@dejardinant@RepCasten No, you didn't. You just stated they existed without giving any justification.
Where would these come from, and who would they be opposable to ?
@SomeWelder@dejardinant@RepCasten Still not inalienable rights.
It is not a matter of subverting b ut of interpretation, United States v. Cruikshank ring a bell ? You had to wait until 2008 for the Supreme court to rule otherwise.
What link do you think exists between the Supreme court and the government ? !