A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.
Her name is Audrey van der Meer.
She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.
The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.
Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.
Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.
When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.
The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.
When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.
Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.
Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.
The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.
Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.
Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.
Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.
Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.
Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.
A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.
The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.
The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.
The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.
That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.
Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.
Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.
Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.
You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.
The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.
Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
Joillakin erikoinen käsitys kesäyön rauhasta.😤 Andre ym raikaa sunnuntaiaamuna klo 4 niin, että varmasti koko eteläinen Lappajärvi sen kuulee. On siinä joutsenperhekin aamu-uinnilla ihmeissään.
Varsin asiallinen hyvinvointialueen johtajan haastattelu.
Sally Leskinen tienaa 16 000 euroa kuukaudessa – nyt Orpon hallitus on ajanut hänet mahdottomaan tilanteeseen
https://t.co/0XoXpPCSNQ
Big news👋. A positive R3 trial for PD-1 in NMIBC! The CREST trial evaluated sasanlimab (PD-1i)+BCG vs Standard BCG (induction and maintenance) in BCG-naïve, high-risk NMIBC.The study met its primary endpoint of EFS with ‘clinically meaningful’ results. https://t.co/8oRNdVgwZd
Dave Lindholmin erittäin osuva sanoitus kappaleesta Anna kitaran laulaa vaan:
"Joskus tuntuu, et maailma kulkee
Ilmapallona kaktuspuistoon
Annan kitaran laulaa vaan
Annan kitaran laulaa taas"
Kannattaa lukea👍
Yksilöllinen syöpähoito toteutuu vasta vuosien kuluttua: ”Juhlitaan pieniä onnistumisia, mutta tunnustetaan iso kuva” https://t.co/mql8twYJ9H
The Taliban has decreed that Afghan women are forbidden to:
Go to high school or university
Work in the civil service
Attend a protest
Go abroad
Drive a car
Travel alone
Ride in a taxi
Speak in public
Speak loudly inside your house
Sing
Read the Quran aloud in public
Speak to a male doctor
Play sport
Go to the gym
Go to the park
Wear bright clothes
Wear high heels
Look at men they don’t know
Show their faces in public
Own a smartphone
Tutkimus | Seisten työskentely lisää veritulppia eikä vähennä sydänriskiä
Maalaisjärjelläkin ymmärrettävissä, liikkuminen on merkityksellistä, ei paikaillaan olo.
https://t.co/1xrjylIeSg
@lasleh@pbockerman Valviran tämän vuoden päivitetyt ohjeet omavalvontasuunnitelman teosta (OVS) ja siitä 4 kk välein tehtävästä raportoinnista, joka nyt koskee myös ammatinharjoittajalääkäreitä, ei oikein istu tähän byrokratian purkutalkoisiin.
@lasleh Pkl työn tuottavuus on laskenut 10-20 % potilastietojärjestelmien vaatimien kirjauskäytänteiden seurauksena. Näin LifeCaressa, Apotti-järjestelmässä kaiketi ainakin samaa suuruuruusluokkaa?
6/6 Finally we discussed the future, with systemic therapy driving cure, and a tailor made approach depending on response. Bladder surgery sparing approached, potentially with maintenance immune therapy and TAR200 was supported. Bladder cancer could change dramatically soon. @DrRosenbergMSK
5/6 The panel felt the EV + PD(L)1 MIBC trails were likely to be positive with pCR rates ~55% and positive OS signals. If this occurs patients will want to check for clinical complete response before major surgery @MattGalsky
Original Article: Results after Four Years of Screening for Prostate Cancer with PSA and MRI (GÖTEBORG-2) https://t.co/qJVOg3gmIj
Editorial: Prostate Biopsy in Men with an Elevated PSA Level — Reducing Overdiagnosis https://t.co/LCB4rIoE5P