Education to d@l!ts is like sharing nuclear codes to likes of O$@ma
b!n laden 🧵
Ths ws never abt so called social justice fr th fact th entire movement of social justice is nt any sort of reverse discriminatn becoz thr ws no discriminatn in th first place to avarnas
The surveys of British missionary & official, William Adam in the 1830s reveal startling data directly contradicting colonial myths about Sati in Bengal.
Important 🧵 Please save for future reference.
What Adam found in his surveys of the district of Murshidabad was astonishing. He explains that there were many more households with just one or two members in the city than in the surrounding countryside, for several combined demographic reasons. Besides day traders and laborers who migrated without families, he noted a large population of thousands of women living without family households of three classes: public women (prostitutes), aged women residing near the Bhagirathi River because of the river’s religious sanctity, and numerous widows.
Adam writes that there were so many widows that people said there were far more widows in the city than in the countryside, because epidemics were killing many more men than women. The demographic implication is striking: many Hindu widows were maintaining their own small households in the city rather than living within large extended family units. Hindu Bengal’s urban social landscape therefore included many widows who were not only a visible part of society but also often living independently or semi-independently with some form of income.
Many likely supported children, since they appear in Adam’s statistical category of households consisting of one or two individuals. This means widowhood was not rare or exceptional but a recognized and enduring condition of social life among Bengal's Hindus. If Sati had been the normal fate of widows, how did Adam encounter such a large concentration of them in the very heart of Bengal’s society??
Adam also records that many Hindu Zamindar families educated their daughters in writing and accounting so that, if widowed, they could manage their estates. Some who were uneducated before marriage were even taught by parents or brothers after widowhood to protect their own interests. If Hindu families expected widows to die routinely by sati, why would they invest in educating them for estate management? The evidence suggests the complete opposite: families anticipated widowhood as a long-term social reality and prepared women to navigate property, finance, and household authority after a husband’s death.
In Adam’s survey of Natore District, he found that about half of the principal zamindars were widows. Two in particular - Rani Suryamani and Kamal Mani Das- were even known to be fully literate in Bengali writing and accounts, and several others were at least semi-literate.
The very fact that Adam could record such large numbers of Hindu widows across Bengal's districts proves clearly that widowhood was not just common but also socially accommodated. If Sati had truly been the universal fate of Hindu widows as colonial rhetoric claimed, then how were there so many widows living across multiple districts? Adam’s own observations reveal how incredibly misleading that malicious trope was. The statistical evidence he recorded instead points to a far more complex social landscape in which the overwhelming majority of Hindu widows didn't just live on instead of committing Sati - they remained embedded in society, and in many cases exercised real economic responsibility. Many even lived independently in urban areas. Their everyday visibility stands as quiet but powerful evidence against the bigoted British colonial myth of Sati as prevalent in Hindu Bengal.
It's high time we got rid of this utterly false colonial narrative of Sati which was created by the British to demonize Hindus and achieve missionary objectives - and demolish it permanently with the concrete evidence we have at hand.
Source: William Adam, Reports on the State of Education in Bengal (1835 & 1838), ed. Anathnath Basu (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1941).
SC -ST-OBC, The holy trinity of corrupt and rotten communities in india. They are like parasites which feed from the body of the host, till it dies. May they see hell in this life and the after.
@mohit_sh84@immgkj_ Dakshayani Velayudhan
A dalit
An woman who ws in constituent assembly long before tht british stooge sakpal gave so called rights to women 🤡😂
Chomu 🤡
@mohit_sh84@immgkj_ Constitution ws crafted by B N RAU in 1946 itself 🤡
Sakpal ws added to tht assembly only in 1947 as chairman
Chomu ur a dumb 🤡😂 larping here with absolute lies
Dr. Ambedkar himself says that he referred to Manusmriti & other smritis for drafting hindu code bill.
1. In his Siddharth College Speech (11th Jan 1950), he says:
"I used Manusmriti for caste determination, Parashara Smriti for divorce, Brihaspati Smriti for women’s rights, and Manusmriti for inheritance rights."
(Collected Speeches, Vol. 8, pp. 17-18)
2. In his Rajaram Theater Speech (25th Dec 1952), he says:
“My bill’s critics claim it abandons Hindu scriptures. I challenge them to find a clause unsupported by Manusmriti. Women’s property should go to daughters after death, just as brothers inherit the father’s.”
(Source: Janata, 3rd Jan 1953)
Yes, BN Rau was a Dalit.
I swear so in the name of Savarna Dr Ambedkar who said:
“The credit that is given to me does not really belong to me. It belongs partly to Sir B.N. Rau the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly who prepared a rough draft of the Constitution for the consideration of the Drafting Committee.”
@HQuarterma43504 Thr ws a reason if at any point untouchability ws practiced.
To keep oneself safe frm morons who comprise themselves in treacherous activities, commiting heinous acts etc.
Democracy empowers ths folks,thus establishing th seeds fr th destruction of th civilization.
This is absolutely outrageous LIES by @tishasaroyan
In his podcast with you, Mani Shankar Aiyer has the audacity to declare at 11:07 in the video that under the Somanath temple - "It was a Buddhist Prayer Hall that was destroyed during the rise of Hinduism against the Buddhists after Shankaracharya - and it seems Mularaja had built a small temple with a small Mandapa on the ruins of that Buddhist Prayer Hall", all this while Ruchika nods in agreement.
Did Mani Shankar come up with this bizarre fantasy in some dream, so that he could demonize Hindus?
Ruchika and Mani Shankar Aiyer are blatantly LYING! B.K. Thapar of the ASI carried out excavations underneath the Somanath mandir in 1950-51. His excavation report mentions NO such thing as what Aiyer is claiming. Thapar never found any trace of any Buddhist remains underneath the Somanath Mandir!
In his report Thapar clearly reports evidence of three Hindu temple phases under the Somanath structure and also discovered remains of an even earlier structure beneath the earliest excavated temple phase, including reused sculptural fragments, older retaining walls, and other pre-existing remains. Thapar explicitly states that the nature and date of the earliest structure could NOT be determined from the available evidence. He NEVER identified it as a Buddhist hall. His excavations yielded ZERO Buddhist remains. (See Screenshots 1 and 2 from B.K. Thapar's report summary below)
In fact, the ONLY hypothesis Thapar claims is that the earlier structure may have been a Hindu Surya (Sun) temple, based on its long-standing association of Prabhasa with sun worship in Hindu Puranic tradition.
Ruchika and Mani Shankar Aiyer have blatantly FALSIFIED B.K. Thapar's report, to distort the historical facts and demonize Hindus as iconoclasts.
Please take serious note of this outrageous distortion of the sacred Somanath Mandir's history @EduMinOfIndia@MinOfCultureGoI@AmitShah clearly
How long will we allow such malicious, lying charlatans to distort and falsify our history, so that they can spread hatred between communities and portray Hindus as villains?
@BijonBiswa56401@priestlyclass Going ur way of so called dignity
Kafirs don't even deserve to live, atleast brhaminism allows a life to ths folks
Anyway in !slam prophets solely belongs to Quraish tribe no other tribes cn hv prophets
So much dignity.
Word dal!t itself ws used by phule🙂
Do U know?
China too has a Sati-like practice- but far more gruesome.
Not only widows comitted suicide but there were mass murders too-Documented in Chinese sources themselves.
Indian Twitter exposed caste discrimination in China.
Let's expose this too.
[THREAD]
@harshjatav96133@neha_laldas तो चादरमोद ये पैसे कौन खा रहा
अमीर बहुजन शोषित बंचित तुम लोगों की सीट खा रहे
तुम यहां सवर्णों पर भड़ास निकल रहे हो।
कितना लूटोगे इस देश को कुछ तो अच्छा काम करो।
@AmbedkariteLM $c/$t seats meant fr poor $c/$t folks r occupied by rich/privileged $c/$t folks nt by any UCs.
Same with every sector.
Infact its th privileged folks who bn l00ting resources in th name of fake victimhood stories.
L00teras still nt yet satisfied after l00ting resources since yrs.