Matthew Schanche

Biblical Researcher | Investigative Journalist - Get Educated. Be Prepared.

Patreon -

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐈𝐕. 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐁𝐔𝐈𝐋𝐓 𝐁𝐘 𝐀 𝐁𝐀𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑, 𝟏𝟓𝟖 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐁𝐄𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐉𝐄𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐎𝐍

𝗥𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝘀 — founder of Rhode Island and of 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗕𝗮𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮, banished by Massachusetts for opposing a state church — wrote in 1644:

"...𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙖 𝙜𝙖𝙥 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙤𝙧 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙂𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙, 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘵𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧, 𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙠, 𝘦𝘵𝘤., 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘎𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘢 𝘞𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴."

Read it carefully, because it is the reverse of what people assume.

𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼��� 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵. 𝗛𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲. His fear was not that religion would corrupt politics, but that politics would corrupt religion — that a church reaching for the world's power becomes a wilderness and loses its candlestick.

That is not Enlightenment skepticism. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 — and it is the origin of the metaphor Jefferson later used.

"𝘏𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙯𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙤𝙢... 𝘏𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘙𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘐𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘺𝘭𝘶𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙨 — 𝙘𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 — 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼����𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙍𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘." — The Great Controversy, 294–295

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰. Not a footnote to it.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKAfb0

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

What appears on the surface to be a government commission created to “𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮” becomes something far more consequential once you actually read the documents, examine who is involved, understand the constitutional history, and ask where these recommendations could ultimately lead.

At the center of this investigation is the 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, established by President Trump in May 2025 and housed within the Department of Justice. Its draft report runs 224 pages, follows seven hearings and testimony from more than 100 witnesses, and was largely developed through hearings held at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, D.C. Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick serves as Chairman, with former HUD Secretary and Seventh-day Adventist Dr. Ben Carson serving as Vice Chairman. But perhaps more consequential than either name is the structure itself: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝘅 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗼 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗗𝗢𝗝 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰���𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗳𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆.

And this is where things become extremely important. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙣𝙪𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧-𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩’𝙨 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙩��𝙤-𝙥𝙖𝙜𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙚 𝙜𝙪𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙛𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙀𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝘾𝙡𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 “𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚.”

That is not buried on page 200. It is recommendation number one.

The report goes on to recommend a DOJ Religious Liberty Task Force, new religious-liberty reporting mechanisms, updated Attorney General guidance, strategic litigation, and challenges to existing laws and judicial precedents the Commission believes improperly restrict religion.

The language used throughout the report deserves just as much attention. Instead of simply arguing that religious Americans should be protected from government interference, the Commission openly challenges the traditional “wall of separation” model. One section moves directly from “Building Walls of Separation between Church and State” to “Building Bridges Between Church and State.” The report argues that church and state can “strengthen and support one another” and speaks of establishing a more “rightly ordered relationship” between them.

That should immediately raise a basic question: 𝗜𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗲𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺?

We go back to the Constitution to answer that question.

Article VI explicitly declares that “𝙣𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙏𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙙” 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲. Four years later, the First Amendment added two enormous protections: the Establishment Clause—“𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙣𝙤 𝙡𝙖𝙬 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙣”—and the Free Exercise Clause—𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗵𝗶𝗯𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻.

Interestingly, the exact phrase “separation of church and state” does not appear in the Constitution, but neither do phrases such as “separation of powers,” “checks and balances,” “presumption of innocence,” or even “right to a fair trial.” 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, not necessarily direct quotations from the text.

We also look at a fascinating constitutional detail that rarely receives attention: Article I explicitly says “Sundays excepted” when calculating the President’s ten-day period for signing legislation. Sunday was therefore recognized procedurally from the beginning—but 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙨 𝙚𝙣𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙤𝙗𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚. That distinction becomes critical when discussing where religious liberty ends and religious establishment begins.

The episode then examines the very court cases often ignored when people argue that the “wall of separation” has somehow persecuted Christianity. Everson v. Board of Education invoked strong church-state separation language while still ruling in favor of families sending their children to Catholic schools. In other words, separation did not require hostility toward religion. Sherbert v. Verner protected Seventh-day Adventist Adele Sherbert after she lost employment because she refused to violate the Saturday Sabbath. And in Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme Court strengthened protections for an employee seeking accommodation for Sunday observance.

𝗣𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀-𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿���𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀.

That brings us to perhaps the most important question in the entire episode:
𝘿𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙖𝙢 𝙛𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙢𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙣—𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 ��𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙚?

That distinction becomes especially important when we examine the growing influence of Catholic integralist thought, where some writers openly reject complete separation between Church and State and defend the idea that religious authority can legitimately exercise coercive power under certain circumstances. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 “𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹” 𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘄𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴. If Christians are already free to preach, worship, evangelize, build churches, operate schools, publish literature, petition government, and keep their Sabbath, then what additional “liberty” is supposedly being denied?

And then there is the Department of Justice.

If America were ever to cross the line from protecting religion into legally enforcing religious observance, what federal department would ultimately investigate violations, litigate the cases, defend the laws, and potentially prosecute those who refused to comply? Would it not be the DOJ? And before such a system could function, wouldn't that department first need the legal guidance, constitutional interpretation, litigation strategy, institutional infrastructure, and favorable precedent necessary to defend it?

𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬.

We are not claiming the Religious Liberty Commission has proposed a Sunday law. It has not. The report does not command Americans to worship on Sunday, and accuracy matters enormously here. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵-𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗗𝗢𝗝 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀����𝗶𝗽, 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀.

The question is not simply, “Is there a Sunday law today?”
The question is:
If one were proposed tomorrow, what legal and institutional groundwork would have to exist first?

We also examine Project Esther, the Heritage Foundation strategy released in 2024, because it provides another revealing example of how private religious and political objectives can be translated into coordinated governmental action. Project Esther openly envisions public-private cooperation, legal pressure, federal and state involvement, litigation, institutional pressure, and government authority being used to accomplish its objectives. Whether one agrees with those objectives or not, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀—and it provides another window into how quickly an ideological framework can move from private policy papers into actual governmental infrastructure.

There has perhaps never been a more important time to understand the difference between religious influence and religious coercion, between protecting Christianity and empowering government to define Christianity, and between freedom of conscience and enforced conformity.

This is exactly why The Truth Project exists.

We are willing to read the reports most people will never read, sit through the hearings most people will never watch, trace the constitutional arguments most people will never investigate, and ask the uncomfortable questions that must be asked before—not after—the consequences become obvious.

To everyone supporting this work: thank you. You make this kind of research possible. You allow us to devote the time necessary to investigate these developments carefully rather than simply chasing headlines. And most importantly, you help us continue putting the evidence in front of people while there is still time to understand what is happening.

Please watch this one all the way through. As you'll see, the details matter.

𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗧𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝘁 𝟮𝗽𝗺 𝗘𝗦𝗧 - "The Religious Liberty Report Is Out: Goodbye Religious Liberty, Hello Sunday Law | The Truth Project Ep. 41"
https://t.co/GKzdry5JkQ

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐃𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞

Because it's twofold, and the second half is the one we'd rather skip.
Yes — there is a very real empire of evil at work, headed by Satan's visible kingdom on earth, working tirelessly to heal that wound. That's real. Watch it. Report on it. We will.

But Mrs. White also told us what makes a nation ripe for it: "𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩. 𝘙𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦... 𝘑𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘥, 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘥. 𝘋𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘬𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘳𝘺, 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘦𝘯𝘷𝘺, 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵, 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘴. '𝙅𝙪𝙨����𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙛𝙖𝙧 𝙤𝙛𝙛; 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 𝙞𝙨 𝙛𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙩, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧' (𝘐𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘢𝘩 59:14)" (ST July 4, 1899).

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗼𝗻. 𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻 — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝘁. The heart is wicked and deceitful beyond all else, and there is no solving any problem in this world without first solving the problem of the heart. 𝗔 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀, 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆, 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼. That's the whole history of the papacy in one sentence. And it's the trap now being laid for American Protestantism.

𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐖𝐞 𝐆𝐨 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞

Here at The Truth Project, we're compiling what we believe will be one of the most comprehensive guides to what is happening, who is behind it, and where this is headed — because this document will be generating legal precedent for the rest of our lives. Today's piece is just the down payment.
But let's leave it here. Dan Patrick actually said one true thing at that Rose Garden ceremony: "𝘕𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳."

𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗻. Not a commission. Not a calendar. Not a DOJ memo, a court, a church, or a million bumper stickers.

Prophecy is not given to frighten us. It's given so that when these things come to pass, we believe. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗹𝗲, 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗱, 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗳 "𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘆." Which means the next items on the schedule are just as certain — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗼 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝘁. Keep His commandments. Hold the faith of Jesus. And keep watching.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKzHls

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

"𝐈𝐓'𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐓𝐔𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍"
𝘈 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘮����𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘭

𝐆𝐎𝐃 𝐓𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐔𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐆
Before a word about Jefferson, Madison, or the Supreme Court — start where we always start.
What God said.

-"𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘏𝘪𝘨𝘩, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘏𝘪𝘨𝘩, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨." — Daniel
-"𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘳 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮: 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸����𝘳 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴." — Revelation 13:7

Read what is being described. Not a church that teaches error — the world is full of those, and none of them can wear out anybody. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱. 𝗔 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗿, 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗯𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆.

And God did not say it ended in 1798.

-"𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘴𝘢𝘸 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘸��𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘥: 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵." — Revelation 13:3

-"𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵, 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘥." — Revelation

The healing does not happen in Rome. A second power — lamblike, arising where there was no crowded, warring civilization — is the one that hands the authority back. That is the prophecy, and it is why a government report on religious liberty is worth reading closely.

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐨𝐰
From the draft report of the Presidential Religious Liberty Commission, June 2026:

-"𝘛𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘰𝘮, 𝙬𝙚 𝙢𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙙𝙜𝙚𝙨, 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙨, 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘔𝘢𝘯."
-"𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙝𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙚 '𝙬𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚' 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙣𝙚𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙁𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙣𝙤𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙚𝙡𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾����𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣."

And from the movements whose positions the report reflects, speaking to their own:

-"𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺... 𝙛𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙡𝙮 𝙮𝙚𝙨 𝙬𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙜𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙪𝙥𝙤𝙣 𝙮𝙤𝙪. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘵, 𝘐'𝘮 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘺." — William Wolfe, former Trump advisor

-"𝘾𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙡 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙗𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙮, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮��𝘭𝘦, 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘶𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝙎𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥." — Stephen Wolfe

𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬

-"𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘴, 𝘴𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘰𝘥; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝙞𝙣 𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 ���𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘺 — 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙮𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙪𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨, 𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 '𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙮.'" — The Great Controversy, 443

-"𝘐𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘮����𝘨𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 ��𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙢𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙡 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙮𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨." — The Great Controversy, 443

-"𝙂𝙤𝙙 𝙣𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚; 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙎𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙣'𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙤𝙧𝙩 — 𝙩𝙤 𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙢 𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙬𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙚 — 𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙪𝙡𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙮 𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙮. 𝘛𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴, 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘰𝘥." — The Great Controversy, 591

That is the contrast. One side says bridges, not walls, and we are going to impose it upon you. The other says a church that reached for the state's power to control conscience became the papacy — and that compulsion is not God's method but the enemy's.

This is just the beginning of us breaking down the documentary case that the wall those men want removed is real, is textual, and was put there on purpose. Look out for new details daily.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKAfb0

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐈. 𝐖𝐇𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐓𝐔𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 & 𝐁𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐎𝐅 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐖𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐓𝐄𝐍 𝐀𝐓 𝐀𝐋𝐋

The argument that the "separation of church and state is not Constitutional" only works on people who have forgotten this, so it comes first.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. They were written by men within living memory of a specific injury, to prevent its recurrence.

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐣𝐮𝐫𝐲?

For centuries the church defined the offense, tried the accused, pronounced him a heretic — and then relinquished him to the secular arm, and the state carried out the sentence. The church supplied the verdict; the state supplied the fire. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, not mob violence, and it is exactly what "the authority of the state employed by the church" means.

Huss burned at Constance in 1415 despite an imperial safe-conduct. Tyndale strangled and burned in 1536 for translating the Bible. The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in 1572, celebrated in Rome with a commemorative medal.

𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲, 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿. Henry VIII did not abolish the union of church and state. 𝗛𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. The established church, compulsory conformity, and civil penalties for dissent were all left standing and simply changed hands.

So English dissenters were persecuted by a Protestant establishment using Roman methods — the Act of Uniformity, the Conventicle Act, the Five Mile Act.

"𝘈𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙂𝙤𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙣𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙀𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙙!" — Signs of the Times, November 8, 1899

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀. Pilgrims, Puritans, Quakers, Baptists, Huguenots — and Catholics to Maryland, fleeing an established Protestant church.

The lesson the founders drew was the hard one: men who had personally suffered under the Papacy's heavy hand, all claiming to be done in the name of God, now were tasked with making a new nation with the proper guardrails to never allow such atrocities to happen again.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗳���𝗲𝗱. In Virginia in the 1760s and 70s, 𝗕𝗮𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗷𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵. Dozens of them.

𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲: Article VI and the First Amendment are remedies, written by injured parties, against a named disease. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲.

A generation that has forgotten the disease will eventually repeal the remedy — not from malice, but from ignorance. The Religious Liberty Commission and its findings today prove that the world is back on the same track to doing what it did in the past — persecuting the people of God in the name of God.

"𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘴𝘢𝘸 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘥: 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙬𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙩." Revelation 13:3

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKzHls

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐝𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧?

Ellen White named it. Twice:
"𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘫𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘴 ���𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘰 𝘢𝘣𝘫𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘮 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭, 𝘣𝘺 𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘤𝘵, 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘨𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘵 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘰��𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘺𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 ��𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘮. 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘥. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙠 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧, 𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝, 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨 𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙪𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙚 𝙖 𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙥𝙤𝙨���𝙖𝙨𝙮 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙚𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙞𝙣 𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙧𝙪𝙞𝙣." — ST July 4, 1899

"𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘥. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙛𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨 𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙪𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙖𝙗𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙗𝙚 𝙚𝙣���𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙗𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘯." — ST March 22, 1910

𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆. First: Protestant churches unite with the secular power. Then: the papal sabbath enforced by the combined authority of church and state. The union comes first. The wall has to come down before anything can be enforced through where it stood.

That's why this report is bigger than any Sunday bill ever introduced. Sunday laws have come and gone since the Blair bill of 1888. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 — 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘁. This report exists to change what it means. Tear down the wall first, standardize the calendar second, and the "national act" she described stops being legally impossible. The deadly wound this power received in 1798 doesn't heal by accident. It heals because professed Protestants — American Protestants — become its biggest helpers.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗵��𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKzHls

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐚 𝐌𝐚𝐧 𝐋𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐒𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐁𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐋𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭

Let's spell out the conflict of interest, point by point, because it's not subtle:

-𝗛𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. You cannot chair a religious liberty commission while calling religious liberty's legal foundation "a lie." That's a fox chairing the henhouse security committee.

-𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗱. All 100+ handpicked. A commission that only hears from people who blame "separation of church and state" for their problems isn't investigating anything. It's manufacturing a court record.

-𝗛𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗹𝘆. A man who thinks the Establishment Clause principle is fictional cannot weigh the claims of a Jew, a Muslim, a Sabbath-keeper, or an atheist against a Christian majority. Those are exactly the people the wall protects.

-𝗛𝗲'𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘀𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀. His own Ten Commandments law is being litigated under the doctrine his report tells the DOJ to dismantle. He is relitigating his personal legal battles with federal machinery.

-𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲𝗱. His #2 donor's owner was vice chair of, and still supports, the institute publishing the Sunday-Sabbath calendar campaign. In any other context we'd call that what it is: an undisclosed alignment of interests.

-𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀. Mainly composed of Catholics and Evangelical Christians, defining "religious liberty" for 340 million people. It has already been sued over its lack of diversity.

-𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁. This isn't about bumper stickers. It's about a paper trail designed to reach the Supreme Court and stay there.

𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐲 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐁𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬
Here is where I stop and remind you: none of this should surprise anyone who's read The Great Controversy. The mechanism was described in detail:

"𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙮 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙨, 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙂𝙤𝙙; 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘺, 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴, 𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 '𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘺.' 𝙄𝙣 𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢 𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙜𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙢𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙡 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙮𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨." — The Great Controversy, p. 443

𝘈 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴. That is not a metaphor anymore. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲-𝗽��𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁.

And who would lead the charge? Professed Protestants — the spiritual children of people who were hunted, jailed, and burned for opposing exactly this:

"𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘎𝘰𝘥'𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘼𝙡𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙮 𝙛𝙪𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙨, 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚, 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙤 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙂𝙤𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙗𝙮 ��𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙𝙡𝙮 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚. 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥! 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙖 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣���𝙨." — ST November 8, 1899

"𝘉𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚-𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙥𝙖𝙥𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙚𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙡 𝙩𝙤 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪�� 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘺." — ST November 8, 1899

"𝘝𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦-𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦." A Baptist preacher with a Catholic wife and decades of Catholic collaboration, handing Rome the demolition of the American wall — and calling it religious liberty. She wrote that in 1899. 127 years later, we're seeing its direct fulfillment before our very eyes - standing in the President's Oval Office.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/HgtEMKzHls

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

Case In Point: Even Ben Carson Doesn't Understand The Separation of Church and State Issue

As further evidence to support this witnessing material on responding to the growing calls to unite church and state, we present an example showing that even Adventists can be persuaded by these arguments, despite more than a century of biblical and prophetic warnings that this very movement would arise.

Here is Carson in 2023 stating the separation of church and state is not in the constitution. Today, he sits as Vice Chair of the Religious Liberty Commission, which advocates for the unification of church and state.

We will cover Carson's position in much greater depth in future material. For now, consider it in light of what we have already studied: those who advocate for the union of church and state fundamentally misunderstand the issue, both biblically and historically. No one is immune to this deception if they set aside the plain teachings of God's Word. That is precisely why this subject deserves careful study, humility, and a willingness to let Scripture, not culture, politics, or emotion, shape our convictions.

The facts. The Justice Department's own page lists the Religious Liberty Commission's leadership as Dan Patrick (Chair) and Dr. Ben Carson (Vice Chair) — former HUD Secretary, author of Project 2025's HUD chapter, former Regent trustee, and a Seventh-day Adventist. In 2023, Dr. Carson said this:

Three years later, delivering the Commission's report in the Oval Office on June 26, 2026, Chairman Dan Patrick said: "The separation of church and state is not in the Constitution." Carson stood beside him.

WHAT HE IS NOW PART OF. That statement is the load-bearing premise of the body he now serves as second officer. Here is what it is asking the President to do:

>> Recommendation one of twelve: instruct the Department of Justice to issue guidance "clarifying the proper understanding of the Establishment Clause and separation of church and state."

>> Presidential proclamations of holy days and calls to prayer and fasting, bounded only by "the Nation's historical traditions."

>> Conscience and Religious Freedom Divisions in every federal agency, with power to investigate, enforce, and oversee remedies — replicated in all fifty states and internationally.

And Project 2025 — the Heritage document Dr. Carson contributed a chapter to — calls for a premium on Sabbath work, specifying the day "would default to Sunday." A fellow Commission advisor, Mark David Hall of Regent and Cato, notes that Sunday legislation remains on the books and has never been struck down on Establishment Clause grounds.

Remove the wall, proclaim the holy day, default the rest day to Sunday, build the machinery. Each step is public. Together they are the image.

"In order for the United States to form an image of the beast, the religious power must so control the civil government that the authority of the state will also be employed by the church to accomplish her own ends." — The Great Controversy, 443

WHY THIS MATTERS MORE THAN ONE MAN. It would be easy to make this about Dr. Carson. It isn't. He is a surgeon of extraordinary gift who by every account believes he is defending religious freedom. That is exactly the point. The error has reached the highest level of Adventist public life. A member of this church can sit as second officer of a commission alongside a Cardinal, four Opus Dei affiliates, and two Knights of Malta, repeat the argument our people have spent 150 years answering, and apparently not recognize it.

We should not be shocked. Ancient Israel had the oracles of God, the sanctuary, the prophets, and the Sabbath — and still absorbed the surrounding nations' ideas one at a time until they could no longer tell the difference. Truth has never made anyone immune to the spirit of the age.

"Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation." — The Great Controversy, 573

Little know. Not conspiring. Not wicked. Not knowing.

WHICH MAKES THIS YOUR WORK NOW. If a lifelong Adventist in the second seat of a federal religious liberty commission can hold this position, no one is carried by the church's history. Each of us has to understand this and say it plainly in our own words — because the argument is coming, it is getting louder, and it will be made by sincere people we respect.

Know why the wall exists, who built it, what it cost them, and what Scripture says about a church that reaches for the sword. Then say it, in modesty, in grace, in love, but say it.

If You Still Don’t Believe the Image Forms in America, Watch This 👉https://t.co/I9Bz35Q8BK

With: @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐋𝐞𝐭'𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲.

Seriously. It's that big.

And while the world talks about data centers, Epstein files, and whether climate change is real, the actual story — the one prophecy has been pointing at for over a century — just walked through the front door of the Oval Office wearing a name badge that says "religious liberty."

𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 ���𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬
On May 1, 2025 — the National Day of Prayer, of all days — the President signed Executive Order 14291 creating the Religious Liberty Commission, housed under the Department of Justice. Chairman: Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick. Vice chair: Dr. Ben Carson. Director: Mary Margaret Bush. Over the next year, the commission held seven hearings and heard from over 100 witnesses.

𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗽𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. Remember that. It matters.

On June 26, 2026, they delivered the final report to the President in the Oval Office with twelve key recommendations. And sitting near the top of the list: that the Department of Justice issue official guidance "clarifying" the Establishment Clause — because, the report argues, the phrase "wall of separation between church and state" doesn't appear in the Constitution. The report calls separation of church and state a "myth." It says religious liberty should be a "bridge" between church and state instead of a wall.

𝗔 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗴𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝟭𝟳𝟵𝟴.

"𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘧 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, 𝘸𝘩��𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘺𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘱 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮, 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣, 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙡𝙙 𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘭��𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳." — Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 451.

This document is a clever mechanism. It is not a press release, 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘁𝗼 "𝗿𝗲𝗽𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻", just as Ellen White said. It's, for lack of a better term, a demolition permit for the constitution and bill of rights.

DOJ guidance becomes enforcement policy. Enforcement policy becomes court cases. Court cases become precedent. ����𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵, 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹. That's the play. That's why it will take a lifetime of reporting on.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐎𝐮𝐭 𝐋𝐨𝐮𝐝
You don't have to take my word for what this commission believes. Take the chairman's comments from the video below. There is no other way to slice it. The religious liberty commission and the report have one, central goal. Prepare for the unification of church and state.

At an April 2026 commission meeting, Dan Patrick said — out loud, on the record, as chairman of a federal religious liberty commission:
"𝗪𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮 𝙡𝙞𝙚."
And then: "𝗠𝗮𝘆𝗯𝗲 𝗜'𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗮 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝘂𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝘆 ���𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲."

Not one commissioner disagreed. Not one.

Then in June, standing behind the President in the Oval Office: "𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁: 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 '𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲' 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻."

This is a jaw-dropping statement coming from someone leading a report about religious liberty. The fact that those words could be spoken with serious intent tells you one of two things: either Patrick has no concept of religious liberty at all, or the commission was never about religious liberty in the first place. There is no third option.

𝗦𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺 — 𝗶𝘁 𝗜𝗦 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺'𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘆. It's the only reason the state can't tax you for another man's church, jail you for another man's creed, or force you to observe another man's holy day.

...𝑦𝑒𝑡.

We're diving into what is appearing to be the start of the most serious religious liberty crisis since America's founding. Hit "follow" and subscribe on YouTube to catch every detail 👉 https://t.co/3qPy6ozarG

With @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky

#TheTruthProject #BibleProphecy #EndTimes

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟭𝟬: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗴 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝘁)

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
𝗕𝗲𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱 ����𝗼𝘂𝗽𝗹𝗲, 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝘁.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗕𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟭𝟴𝟵𝟯 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 '𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵' — 𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘆. The straight leg is the appearance of a holy day; the bent leg is the deliberate counterfeit. It is the holy mixed with the unholy: a false day standing in the true day's place.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
What the child is — named by Rome itself.

This is not an accusation leveled from outside. The offspring is 'the Christian Sabbath,' Sunday, exactly as the 1893 caption titles it. The significance is that Rome is naming its own child.

𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵.
There is no 'Jewish Sabbath' or 'Christian Sabbath' in the Bible — only the seventh-day Sabbath of the Lord, set apart at creation and uniquely prefaced with 'Remember.'
"...𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙗𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙇𝙊𝙍𝘿 𝙩𝙝𝙮 𝙂𝙤𝙙." — Exodus 20:10
"𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙂𝙤𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙮, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙩." — Genesis 2:3
"𝙍𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙗𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙙𝙖𝙮, 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙞𝙩 𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙮." — Exodus 20:8

𝗧𝗵𝗲 ���𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗴 — 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝘅𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘂𝗻𝗵𝗼𝗹𝘆.

One leg straight (the form of a holy day); one leg bent (a counterfeit in the true day's place). 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘹𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘢𝘣𝘺𝘭𝘰𝘯, which is why God's final call is to separate from it.

"𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙧, 𝙢𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙮𝙚 𝙗𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙨." — Revelation 18:4

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
This is the most important and most overlooked piece of the whole mural, so it deserves the most depth. The power of the point is that it does not rest on suspicion: 𝗮 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 ‘𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵.’ The mural paints a wedding and an offspring; the document supplies the offspring’s name. They interlock.

From the biblical side, the trouble is that there is no such category as a ‘Christian Sabbath’ set against a ‘Jewish Sabbath.’ 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗵-𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵, 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 ‘𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿’ — 𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝗳 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗮𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 ��𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁. A world that insists there are two sabbaths, or none, is precisely the condition God warns His people to come out from.

That is why the child’s legs matter. One straight, one bent: a day that looks holy and is not, the holy and the unholy fused until they can’t be told apart. Sunday observance, in this reading, is the visible fruit of the counterfeit union above it — sun-worship dressed as devotion, which Scripture treats as among the gravest abominations (see Ezekiel 8). But the child is holding one more object, and it is the object that gives the counterfeit its power.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch Matthew Schanche & Andrew Bikichky give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzbJa7

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟵: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻)

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗱𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝗮𝘀 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁. 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 — 𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 ����𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁, 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗙𝗔𝗟𝗦𝗘 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 — 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝟭𝟴𝟵𝟯 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳, 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟭𝟴𝟵𝟯 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻����𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺.
In 1893 the Roman Catholic periodical The Catholic Mirror ran a series of editorials defending Sunday worship under a striking title — one that names the husband, the wife, and the child of this exact union:

"𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲." — 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗶𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿, 𝟭𝟴𝟵𝟯

𝗔 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗱'𝘀 𝗹𝗮𝘄.
The bride in this union is the power Daniel foretold would tamper with sacred time and law.1
"...𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘀." — 𝗗𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝗹 𝟳:𝟮𝟱

𝗔 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.
"...𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣." — 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝟭𝟰:𝟴

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
The reason this identification is not a wild guess is that the wording is not mine — it is the document's own caption, repeated over its series of articles. 𝗜𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝘆 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 (𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁) 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵, "𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲." The mural's wedding, sitting directly under Eden and directly over an offspring, lines up with that framing piece for piece.

𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗲. 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵. What is depicted here is a false spirit joined to a church that Daniel said would 'think to change times and laws' — and the result is a worldwide intoxication with false doctrine, the wine of Babylon. The historic Protestant position went further still, identifying this same power as the seat of antichrist.

𝗔 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝘂𝗶𝘁; 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝘂𝗶𝘁. The painting shows the fruit directly below the couple — and the 1893 document already told us its name.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzbJa7

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟳: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝗱𝗲𝗻 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻)

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
At the highest point, a tree. 𝗔𝗻 𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗴, 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗻, 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗶���𝘀 𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝘂𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗴𝗶𝗿𝗹 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝘂𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝘁. Behind the tree, a smaller boy hides, looking afraid.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝗱𝗲𝗻. The serpentine boy in the tree is Satan; the girl reaching for the fruit is Eve; the boy hiding in fear is Adam. They are painted as children to depict innocence at the threshold of the Fall.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
The boy in the tree, entwined like a snake, offering fruit — Satan.
"𝘕𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥... 𝘠𝘦𝘢, 𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥...?" — 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 3:1

The girl reaching for the fruit — Eve.
"...𝘴𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘰𝘧, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘦𝘢𝘵." — Genesis 3:6

The boy hiding in fear — Adam.
"...𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘥... 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘩𝘪𝘥 𝘮𝘺𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧." — Genesis 3:10

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻? 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝗹𝗹.

𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱'𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺����𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝘀.
"...𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵; 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴." — Ecclesiastes 7:29

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
This is the plainest part of the whole mural. A serpentine figure in a tree, handing fruit to a reaching girl, with a frightened figure hiding behind — there is no honest reading of that other than the Fall of man. I'd say no one can look at it and claim otherwise without straining.

But the easy part is the doorway to the hard part. Eden is the origin of the two-seed conflict that runs through the entire Bible, and the mural places it at the very top, inside the womb, as the genesis of everything below. What sits directly beneath the Garden is where the interpretation gets specific and sobering: the wedding.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzcgZF

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗼𝗺𝗯-𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹)

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗳���𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗯 — 𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗲.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
The scene at the top is the conception point of the entire mural. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗯-𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘁 — and that story takes us straight to the book of Genesis.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗔 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗯 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴.

The frame is not incidental. A womb is where life is conceived, and this one encloses the origin of the whole painting. Beginnings send you to one book above all.

"𝘐𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩." — Genesis 1:1

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
This is easy to miss and important not to. The painting could have framed its top scene any number of ways. That it forms a womb around the uppermost imagery is a deliberate cue: 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 — the wedding, the offspring, the phoenix, the buried dragon.

And the destination of that cue is unmistakable. A "womb" refers to a genesis; "genesis" means the book of Genesis. The mural is quietly telling you that to understand the whole thing, you have to return to the very beginning — to the Garden, the serpent, and the first lie – which is exactly the scene painted inside the womb.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzbJa7

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟱: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗣𝗵𝗼𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘅 (𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗪𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱)

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
Standing directly over the buried dragon, dominating the whole mural, a great rising bird — a phoenix. It rises not from ashes but from a shed skin, like a serpent. It reads as white, but the shading is white and black together. Everything in the painting is arranged around it.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘅 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗼��𝗲𝗿 — the Papacy in its post-1798 'healed wound' era. White like the robes of holiness, yet shot through with black: a counterfeit holiness, holy mixed with unholy, that the whole world wonders after.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱.

The phoenix is the visual sermon of the healed wound. It stands on the dragon's grave because it is that power, returned.

"...𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙡𝙮 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙙: 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵." — Revelation 13:3 Revelation 12:9

The color white — the appearance of righteousness.

White, in Scripture, is the righteousness of Christ and His saints. A white phoenix presents itself clothed in holiness — like the white the pope wears.

"...𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘮𝘣." — Revelation 7:14

"...𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴���𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘴." — Revelation 19:8

Mixed with black — counterfeit holiness.

The shading betrays it: the form of godliness without the substance. White on the surface, black underneath.

"𝘏𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘰𝘥𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘰𝘧: 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘯 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺." — 2 Timothy 3:51

"...𝘚𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵." — 2 Corinthians 11:14

The serpent's shed skin — who renewed it?

It rises not from ash but from a serpent-like molt, pointing back to the dragon as the author of its renewal.
"...𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙤𝙣 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘨𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘵." — Revelation 13:4

The head reaching upward — the origin story is at the top.

The phoenix's head spills over into the scene at the very top. Its rise is connected, by the artist's own line, to that upper scene. 𝗧𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽.

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
The phoenix is one of the oldest occult symbols in the world — the creature that dies in fire and returns from its own ashes. The phoenix symbolizes rebirth. Its placement here is everything: it is the literal and visual center of the mural, with the whole world composed around it, exactly as Revelation says 'all the world wondered after the beast.'

But notice the deviation from the standard myth: this phoenix does not rise from ashes; 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗲�� 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁. That single change re-points the symbol away from generic rebirth and back toward the dragon beneath — the serpent who 'gave him his power.' The bird's resurrection is borrowed from the snake.

And the head is the hinge. By spilling the phoenix's head up into the topmost scene, the painting tells you its origin story is not down here at all — it is up there, in the Garden and the wedding. You cannot understand how this power rose from death until you decode the top. So that is where we go next.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzcgZF

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟰: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗗𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
𝗔 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸, 𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗻, 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀; 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀, 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗿.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗮 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 — 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 '𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁.' 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀: 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗚𝗼𝗱'𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁.

Scripture is explicit that the enemy's most dangerous disguise is luminous, not monstrous –
"...𝘚𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵." — 2 Corinthians 11:14.

It also warns that there would be those who would “𝘱𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴–” Isaiah 5:20.

A movement 'into light' is therefore not automatically a movement toward God.

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
This is the hinge of the entire interpretation. A casual viewer sees darkness giving way to light and assumes 'good triumphing over evil.' But the Bible warns repeatedly that the final deception will look like light, like peace, like holiness — and will be none of those things.

So when the mural moves the eye upward out of war's darkness into a radiant union at the top, the correct response is not relief but scrutiny. The center column tells us whose light is rising, and it traces that light back to one source: the dragon at the floor. What is its true message?

Only by knowing the “true” can one identify the “counterfeit”: this calls us to a deeper understanding of Scripture and a genuine knowledge of Jesus, the Light of the World (John 8:12).

"𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘰𝘳𝘥: 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵." — Ephesians 5:8

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzcgZF

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬?

At this point, you may be asking yourself 𝙬𝙝𝙮 we’re taking the time to break down the meaning of a painting, so let us explain the crux of it all:
𝗕𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱.

God gave the meanings of the prophecies within the text itself, and pronounced a blessing on all those who read and understand it. (Rev. 1:3) He even went so far as to say, “𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘑𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮.” (Rev. 19:10) 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗱.

But that means it’s not only God’s people who have the ability to know Bible prophecy.

There’s one other who is intimately familiar with it: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.

Satan is not oblivious to Bible prophecy— he’s lived it, he sees how it says it’s going to end, and he hates it.

𝗦𝗼 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗼? 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲:
•Convince non-believers that prophecy isn’t real
•Convince believers that prophecy can’t be understood, or that it’s only able to be interpreted by a certain faction of religious leaders
•Spread fake, counterfeit interpretations that sound legit but don’t fit with the rest of scripture

And for those in the upper eschilons of his plans on earth— 𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆, turning dark for light and light for dark.

Anything to distort, distract, and divert from the truth.

The result? 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁.

𝗕𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀. 𝗜𝘁 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱— and we at The Truth Project refuse to believe that the intricate details of the giant mural placed front and center in the “most important room in the world” — details that happen to 1) feature themes that come directly out of the Bible itself, and 2) create a storyline that is a perfectly inverted image of true Bible prophecy — are random and meaningless.

𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙔𝙊𝙐 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝘽𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮.

That’s how we got here— because we believe there’s no need for anyone to be in the dark about Bible prophecy, or unprepared for what’s coming.

Follow along with us as we deep-dive into the dark message behind the UN Security Council Room Mural.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzbJa7

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟯: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗜𝗿𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘆— 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
At the very bottom: a dark, serpentine, metallic dragon-like figure, bound and encased, with a blade driven through the region of its mouth, set into a ground that looks like scorched clay.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
This is the old Roman power in its religious-political form — the beast that received a deadly sword-wound (historically, in 1798) but did not die.

𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.

The dragon is never neutral in Scripture; it is the origin of the counterfeit power stacked above it.

"...𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝙙𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙤𝙣 𝘨𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺." — Revelation 13:21
"...𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙡𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙘𝙖𝙡����𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙡, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙣, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥." — Revelation 12:9

𝗪𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 — 𝘆𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀.

A death-stroke that did not result in death. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹.

"...𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙩, 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙖 𝙨𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙙, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙙𝙞𝙙 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚." — Revelation 13:14

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘆 — 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴��𝗼𝗺.

The dragon burned into clay-like ground matches the iron-mixed-with-clay of Daniel's prophetic image — a kingdom never fully one thing nor the other.

"...𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙙𝙤𝙢 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙... 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙗𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣." — Daniel 2:41-42

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
Daniel 2 lays out the succession of world empires as a great metal image, ending in legs of iron (Rome) and feet of iron mixed with clay — Rome fractured into a religious-political hybrid that persists to the end. The dragon at the base of the mural, fused into clay, is that hybrid at its lowest point: wounded by the sword.

The historical anchor is precise. The Protestant Reformers identified this wounded-but-living power with the papal system, and pointed to a specific year for the wound: 1798. That February, French troops under General Berthier marched into Rome, deposed Pope Pius VI, and carried him off as a prisoner; he died in exile in France the next year. To much of the world, it looked like the end of the institution.

But Scripture had already said the wound would heal. The whole drama of the mural depends on the fact that this figure at the bottom did not stay dead— which is exactly why we see the phoenix above it, standing on its grave.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzcgZF

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟮: 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗢𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 — 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗧𝗼𝗽, 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗲

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 ���𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
A composition with busy outer panels on the left and right, but a clear vertical column running up the middle: dragon at the bottom, phoenix in the center, a wedding above it, and the Garden at the very top.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝘂𝗽𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲; 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆.

Remember the artist’s own words: “The world we see in the foreground is 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐩𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠, while the 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 based on clarity and harmony can be 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐮𝐩.”

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆: center spine first (the part that survives while the peripheral foreground is “collapsing”), and bottom to top — as it’s being “built up.” If you let your eye wander to the outer panels first, you lose the thread. The discipline of reading the center column bottom-to-top is what makes the story legible. Everything that matters is stacked on that central axis.

𝘊𝘖𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘟𝘛:
This matters because the most common way people dismiss the mural is by treating it as a jumble — a bit of war here, a bit of peace there, no through-line. But a through-line is exactly what it has. From the buried dragon at the floor, to the rising phoenix at the heart, to the union above it, to the Garden crowning the whole thing, there is an unbroken vertical line of cause and effect.

Keep that order in mind as we go, because the direction of travel is itself the argument: the story begins underground in death and rises toward a false 'light' at the top. Reading it bottom to top is reading it the way the deception was built.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzbJa7

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝟭: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗶𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 — 𝗔 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 '𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁'

𝘞𝘏𝘈𝘛 𝘐𝘚 𝘗𝘈𝘐𝘕𝘛𝘌𝘋:
A single enormous canvas, roughly 18 by 29 feet, painted by Norwegian artist Per Krohg and hanging on the east wall of the UN Security Council chamber since 1952. The bottom is dark and chaotic; the top is bright and ordered. At the center, a great bird rises.

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘔𝘌𝘈𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘎:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 — 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 '𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁.' The entire meaning hinges on a single question the painting forces you to ask: 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘁?

𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘉𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘒𝘋𝘖𝘞𝘕:
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲:
Shortly after the United Nations was formed, they set out to find an artist who could decorate the building in a way that depicted their "important political, diplomatic and symbolic position.” Per Krohg (1889–1965) was a Norwegian painter who had never painted anything like this prior. The mural was a gift from Norway, installed in 1952, and has been the backdrop to the world's most consequential meetings for over seventy years. By the record, Krohg had never produced a monumental work of this prophetic character before; his earlier reputation was in landscapes, portraits, and illustration.

Krohg got his inspiration from Italian renaissance art and Catholic Church frescoes. Of the painting, he said, “the essence of the idea is to give an impression of 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁, 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 and joy. The world we see in the foreground is collapsing, while the 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 based on clarity and harmony can be built up.” The mural was entitled the “Mural for 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗲.”

𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁. 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗲. 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.

A New World.

At first glance, these seem like comforting and hopeful concepts. However, the Bible uses these same terms in the form of warnings:
“𝘚𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩.” 2 Corinthians 11:14.
“𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨, “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮,” 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘶𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 ���𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦.” 1 Thessalonians 5:3 (ESV)

Are “light,” “peace, and security” words we can blindly trust? According to the Bible, absolutely not.

𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗱, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗱.

The reason a painting can be read this way at all is that God means for His people to understand prophetic symbolism. That is the premise of this entire study.

“...𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙅𝙚𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮.” — Revelation 19:10.

"𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀; 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱." — 1 Thessalonians 5:21

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

Watch @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky
give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/uGhRAzcgZF

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy

[Matthew Schanche @MattSchanche]

The truth is always stronger than the lie. And for those who love the truth found in Jesus Christ, head over to The Truth Project official twitter channel and follow now.

Jesus really is coming soon and they know it. The plan has been hiding in plain sight at the UN since 1953.

[The Truth Project @TruthProjectInt]

Welcome to 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁'𝘀 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹.

And yes—we're still going to call this platform 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲���.

Why?

Because for nearly two thousand years, the Greek letter Χ (𝗖𝗵𝗶) has been recognized as a symbol representing 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁. It appears in some of the earliest Christian symbolism and is the origin of abbreviations such as "Xmas," where the "X" stands for Christ.

We do not believe the modern branding of this platform, nor the owner who chose to change the name mysteriously to "x", points people to the real Jesus Christ. In fact, quite the opposite.

In our view, it reflects a broader cultural movement that continually substitutes the true Christ of Scripture with counterfeits.

For that reason, we'll continue calling it 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿.

That should give you a good idea of what The Truth Project is all about.

We exist to examine the world through the lens of Scripture—not tradition, not politics, not popular opinion, but the Word of God.

Our purpose is to help believers and non-believers alike discover the reality of the world we live in: a world that, according to the Bible, is preparing for its greatest deception. A world filled with religious language, spiritual experiences, and promises of peace, yet increasingly hostile to a genuine, personal relationship with Jesus Christ that is fully surrendered to and in harmony with His Word.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗡 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗹 𝗠𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳 𝗪𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗕𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆

There may be no greater secular monument illustrating the spiritual battle of our age than the mural inside the United Nations Security Council. It has stood before presidents, kings, diplomats, and world leaders for decades, yet very few have ever asked the most important question:

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠?

Today, we begin a research series that we believe everyone should see.

Our conviction is simple: the only reliable way to interpret imagery that draws upon biblical themes is to compare it with the Bible itself—and especially with Bible prophecy.

Many have been taught that prophecy is mysterious, unimportant, or impossible to understand.

The Bible says the opposite.

"𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙅𝙚𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮." — Revelation 19:10

"𝙆𝙣𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙣𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙥𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙚����𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣." — 2 Peter 1:20

God did not give prophecy to hide truth from His people, but to prepare them for what is coming. Revelation opens with a blessing upon those who read, hear, and keep its words (Rev. 1:3). It was written to be studied, understood, and lived.

Our goal is not simply to expose symbols or hidden meanings.

Our goal is to point people back to the only foundation that cannot be shaken: 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀.

If you follow this channel, you can expect careful research, historical investigation, biblical study, and prophetic analysis designed to equip you to recognize deception, test every claim by the Word of God, and grow in your understanding of Scripture.

The days ahead will require discernment.

Let's search the Scriptures together.

The research begins now.

We hope you enjoy this special compilation of Matt and Andrew uncovering the true meaning behind the United Nations Security Council mural through the lens of Scripture and Bible prophecy.

This cut brings together some of our favorite moments from the series, but there's much more to explore. If you'd like to dive deeper into the research, historical evidence, and biblical foundations behind each section of the mural, be sure to check out the full videos on our channel.

What is the UN Mural really telling us?

The new episode launches TODAY at 2pm PST! @MattSchanche & @AndrewBikichky give the full breakdown on YouTube HERE 👉https://t.co/TBdPolD21D

#TheTruthProject #UNmural #BibleProphecy