@ChameleonCorona@_Credible_Hulk@MattPolProf Humans survived for 7000 years before Walmart, Amazon prime, and nestle. It is completely possible to exist independently of these corrupt corporations, because 99% of consumption is completely unnecessary and does nothing but support capitalism. Just stop consuming so much.
@ChameleonCorona@_Credible_Hulk@MattPolProf Greed generally brings success, Capitalism gives you the option to not subsidize it. If you feel that a company’s practices are immoral or greedy, you the consumer have the option not to buy stuff from them. Greed is rampant because people don’t care as much as they say they do.
@ChameleonCorona@_Credible_Hulk@MattPolProf Capitalism didn’t create the culture, it just allowed individuals to create the culture they live in. The material condition exists because people choose buy from the companies that endorse materialism. If people were inclined to live in communes, they would.
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 I don’t necessarily disagree, but nobody is ripping ring doorbells off peoples houses the way flocks are getting sawed down. Because one is bought and used by the (capitalist) private sector and the other is used by the (non-capitalist) government sector.
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 Flock may be a private company, but it is paid for by the government, for the benefit of the government. Nobody complains about ring doorbells even though they do the same thing, because it’s fully consensual and supported by the private market, rather than government contracts.
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 Agreed, but the anti capitalist government intervention I’m talking about ending are things like bailouts, subsidies, and uhhh idk flock camaras? The thing this post was originally about?
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 It has capitalist aspects, and anti capitalist aspects. Economies aren’t black and white. I’m not saying it isn’t a capitalist country, but that the issues at hand are being caused by the anti capitalist aspects, not the capitalist ones.
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 Any kind of government intervention is anti capitalist. Pro capitalist libertarians bitch constantly about the bailing out of banks during the 2008 crisis, the pointless wars in the Middle East, foreign entanglements, and taxes in general. Republicans are barely pro capitalism.
@nhan_tnt@mcsquared34 If it’s owned by the government that makes it nationalized or public. If it’s owned by anyone other than the government that makes it private. Me owning my car is private ownership of capital, the city bus is public ownership of capital.
@SamSmith94sd@mcsquared34 An enterprise that would not have the influence and power it would have if not for the support and money it receives from the government.
@senseipeen23325@mcsquared34 Given that socialists call themselves anti capitalist, and capitalism is “not a lot of government, the less government there is the more capitalist it is” you can see where the connection between socialism and government intervention comes from
@Dehailo You’ll say this and then left wingers will be like “nooo because capitalism is when bad guy do bad thing and socialism is when good guy do nice thing”
@KaitheeternalDM@Kozzist@mcsquared34 That’s what I’m saying. You proved me right. It’s controlled by individuals (private sector) rather than the state (government). The more aspects controlled by the state, the less capitalistic it is.