I’ve seen some guys posting on social media lately about how they are winning bc their wife is attractive, while I don’t disagree I think finding a wife who is a great mother is 500% more important!!! Thanks @Abamaby for being such a great mom to our kids.
The attacks in Smalls is a perfect example of "know your place" aggression against Black ppl who free themselves from neo-liberalism. Conservatives will call us the n word explicitly but liberals will write op-eds that use euphemisms instead.
These people do not give a windy shit about what American soldiers did in Iraq, or what the Zionist entity is doing to Palestinians. These issues are just springboards for revised domestic policy and nothing else.
The past month has been a nonstop cavalcade of demsocs attacking Palestinians and commies for pointing out the hypocrisy of supporting AOC and Platner. Once the racial element comes in, you fully understand that “Palestine” and “anti-Imperialism” are just words to signal polarity
White Jewish woman attacking a Black, male labor organizer (who was tortured in an Israeli prison, mind you) for the crime of criticizing a popular but soft-on-Israel politician.
It sounds pretty cut and dried to me, I don’t know what else there is to talk about.
Whole lot of "Fuck you" energy directed at people who downplayed the US imperial ecocide agenda or suggested openly or through subtext that the world is industrialized enough to stop/resolve this (it's not even close yet)
This "white librul women did dis" type revisionism doesn't work on South Africa because it was the guy holding the whip that VOTED to end apartheid, they were getting fucked so bad from sanctions and losing wars that they had to choose between that or a civil war they'd lose
Just so everyone is clear, the gripe here is that China is destroying the profits of the western bourgeoisie, because they are forced to make their products cheaper to compete with Chinese competitors.
This is the central argument of 100% of all western economic analysis of China. The more affordable China's products, the more it destroys their monopolies and their profit margins.
As always, the purpose of such propagandists, as well as their "elected" governments, is to make the interests of the bourgeoisie appear like the national interests of their respective countries. It's the first rule of bourgeois economics: What's good for the bourgeoisie is good for the proletariat.
Simplistic and ridiculous take. The revolution will have allies and enemies from all these different groups. You're supposed to identify the revolutionary class and its allies and organize, not cry because we're not allowing war criminals in.
Exactly. HSR lines don’t need direct ticket profits.
The real value lies in multiplier effects: massive time savings, boosted efficiency, connected regions, new economic hubs, and long-term development.
These broader societal gains far outweigh narrow accounting > infrastructure builds nations, not just balance sheets
37% of 11-16 year olds British kids have tried alcohol.
You guys have a giant Alcoholism problem and ur you think ppl eating sugary fruit is more deadly than a country that’s drinking itself to death.