https://t.co/6xl7rAADDC So the argument is that creative destruction led to a cab driver's tragic suicide - therefore, we should ban creative destruction. Yep, that's not protectionist at all. #TheUberFights#Taxi#Uber#Lyft
Using government regulations to set up your own dedicated oligopolies... Congratulations, @Uber. You've come full circle and turned into taxis. https://t.co/nSF8U6QwlG @marcscribner
Interesting policy question. If the govt sells you a public-utility asset (taxi medallion), are they responsible for ensuring its value? Can they be fickle and change their minds later? https://t.co/6vwnn4p17O
@dkhos Not a fan of taxis, but I've never understood the bizarre argument that Uber is just a "facilitator" b/w buyers and sellers of transportation. That's like saying Yankee Stadium is just a "facilitator" b/w players and live viewers. It's obvious which party has the most control.
#Uber owes a lot to @mayoredlee. After launching in 2010, SF taxi regulators wanted to shut them down, and it was really only Lee's intervention that prevented it. Expansion & new rounds of investment would have been very difficult w/o him. #TheUberFights https://t.co/wZNjq2zzNi
Maybe I'm alone in this, but I think people's stories of their Uber/Lyft/Grubhub/Doordash/Instacart drivers are about as mesmerizing as stories of how well a poker hand was played.