@donalddhoffman@alieninsect It’s all true reality. The reference point of the observer matters. Full waking attentive consciousness observes a different spacetime than altered states, or even peripheral attention. Spacetime is determined by the observer.
If I could travel at the speed of light then spacetime would no longer exist to me, kinda like a quantum spacetime. An observer measuring me from a slower velocity doesn’t change my perception of spacetime. The same is true for elementary particles. From their “perspective” spacetime is different than our experience of spacetime.
There can only ever be now and projections outward into time and space. Now is the only thing that’s ever real.
A piece of a thought isn’t a thought. A thought needs to move through time . Anything that’s not now is a memory or prediction. Even in complete stillness a thought is still a reaction to an energetic experience that passed through awareness. It’s not the energetic experience , it’s the thing that experienced it.
@SmithamDan Maybe the only real possibility for time is now towards the future or past? Oneness/humanness is dependent on the realness of the timeline.
Police officers can have trouble with witnesses statements since often everyone remembers something different. Sometimes it’s slightly different, sometimes it’s not. Sometimes the witnesses are certain about something, but their memory is incorrect. If we can be wrong about something we’re certain happened then how can we be certain about anything? What would happen if our memories didn’t match anyone we know? I suppose that would be like jumping timelines in a Sci fi show.