@MichaelFakhri and @l_eslava
I am so excited to read the first edition of this important journal. It is such a wonderful initiative. Thank you for this!
@TWAILReview
📢))) ATTENTION PLANET... the first issue of the **TWAIL Review** is here!!! Massive congratulations to the Editorial Collective!!! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 Make sure to follow @TWAILReview and to read, cite and circulate this wonderful collection of inaugural articles!
🔽 🔽 🔽
As someone who has an Indian birth certificate and ancestral heritage, this new precedent from the SC baffles me… please see article forthcoming about the right to be an Indian citizen (I certainly tick the boxes, but I’m British.. strange days) https://t.co/otVdXO6hZr
@MeghnaKumar10 Put differently: my claim fits if one sees Duncan Kennedy as the archetype of CLS research. We can argue about whether he should be... or pursue methods that ally with our commitments without fighting over the canon of an avowedly "dead" paradigm
@MeghnaKumar10 I mostly identify as a crit, so this should be taken not as a comprehensive critique but as an insider's broad stroke sense of where the centre of gravity lies. Whether I'm right depends on boundary drawing that's probably not productive
@MeghnaKumar10@TWAILReview Yes, I tend to be very cynical myself, feeling that structures power and dominance just keep being reinvented under a new vocabulary. So I think this is really useful, although I guess I have some hope too, otherwise I wouldn't be doing what I'm doing.
@MeghnaKumar10 Absolutely! Esp if you think of the rule as the meaning making part of the exercise; legal reasoning as one way of making sense of the world, but you could apply a different meaning making framework to arrive at/reason towards different conclusions. There may be a paper in that!
@MeghnaKumar10@NPM91@BarristerSecret@pritipatel@KyleLMurray92 Not only do we have a constitution, the vast majority of it is written. And it comes as a surprise to many people that large chunks of the US constitution, for example, are just as uncodified as the UK constitution and are to be found in judicial decisions and statutes.
@MeghnaKumar10@BarristerSecret@pritipatel What classes as lying under oath? Is it a clear and outright lie or is it ‘enhancing’, exaggeration, deliberate attempts to mislead Court with ‘ear worms’ and/or emotive language? Are such tactics lying under oath or just part of gameplay in Court arena #ConcernsRegardingRSpCA
@MeghnaKumar10@ElizaBechtold@Kh_fadl@anmargrace@CassandraSteer Well, I think everyone *does* philosophy, in a broad sense of the term, so everyone who thinks about law could be described as a legal philosopher....but I take it she's referring to a specific field of those who openly say that's what they are (...but we all are...😜😜)
@MeghnaKumar10@ElizaBechtold@KyleLMurray92 @TaraEBeattie @Kh_fadl@anmargrace I think academics are trained to give long explanations, with qualifying statements (and asides in brackets) to ensure we are both demonstrating understanding of existing debates as well as contributing something new, because our success is measured by the marketplace of ideas
@CassandraSteer@MeghnaKumar10@ElizaBechtold @TaraEBeattie @Kh_fadl@anmargrace Don't forget the cheeky footnotes either vaguely instructing the reader to "see further", or else setting out a full paragraph on a tangentially related issue you don't want to be accused of overlooking.
Today's Global South #debtcrisis is like the 1982 debt crisis. Only worse, "because it's also paired with a major #foodcrisis – & they’re both reinforcing each other."
It's a double whammy of debt & #hunger. "The situation is urgent and requires action" @JennClapp tells @thinink
@ElizaBechtold@KyleLMurray92 As Prof Grayling would say “Humanism is the philosophy that you should be a good guest at the dinner table of life.”
Nuff said.