Security policy requirements to change a password more than yearly should be considered terrorism. Not even yearly is even cool. stronger passwords are way better than the easy ones people make up when this is required
“The name of the company, Stanley. It is a cutting edge high tech firm out of the Midwest, awaiting imminent patent approval on the next generation of travel tumblers that have both huge military and civilian applications...”
I'm afraid this is called, "the consequences of your own past actions."
America helped dismantle all the European empires, which spent a fortune on global security. If you want to be the sole superpower *and* have global security, it means you foot the bill.