melbowie

vanilla

[Mrs B @attackdogX]

Animals are actually smarter than us because in their packs, they don’t allow the weaker or retarded ones to lead them.

[Paul Zauch @PaulZauch]

This week our PM spoke about extending the social media ban citing misogynistic content as a main justification.

He then went on a comedy podcast and objectified a famous Australian woman when he could have set an example.

He has no moral courage or moral authority.

#auspol

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Please Explain: Dark Forces

Season 4 Episode 5

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“We have almost every instrument of government dedicated to transgender ideology that seeks to redefine humanity...”

Remember: if the State will force you to accept a man can be a woman, it can force you to believe anything. It’s the ultimate assault on the senses.

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Please Explain: Defund the ABC

Season 4 Episode 4

#ABC #Defund #Insiders #woke #DEI

[Rowan Dean @rowandean]

Brilliant Spectator Australia cover: Albo's lies equal One Nation's rise

[Commentary Australian Greens @GreensAU2]

Who would've thought being soft on crime would result in more crime 😱

[Mother Superior @T0MB0Y0]

Destroyer of women’s rights @JuliaGillard
Yes the banner is here to greet her at Women’s Prize for Fiction, Bedford Gardens, Bloomsbury, London
#WeStandWithSallGrover
@salltweets

[Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺����🇺🇦🇹🇼 @DrewPavlou]

Why are there 12 Australian MPs going to the World Cup lol

[MichaelinMelbourne @Michael94858047]

How convenient LABOR forget the bullying by LABORS MEAN GIRLS on KIMBERLEY KITCHING.

And then there is LINDA REYNOLDS

[Angie Jones @angijones]

@AmeliaBee7 Alan puts male sex offenders in female prisons. She paid off a woman who was sexually assaulted. She is an advocate for the cruelest forms of misogyny and sexism. Being called a “witch” is a compliment compared to what she has inflicted on vulnerable women.

[Kate ❤️✊ ♀️ @Kat4e4]

In Australia you can call a certain kind of woman a TERF & it's entirely okay.

Terfs are those woman fighting for women & girl's Rights.

Call a woman a Witch & you'll have trouble framed as Sexism.

@JacintaAllanMP #GigglevTickle #SexMatters #auspol #FixtheSDA #LetWomenSpeak

[Ben Robson @brobson_politic]

It is literally impossible, by definition, for a person who can not define the meaning of the word "woman" to meaningfully accuse anyone of being misogynistic.

By definition, for anyone to accuse someone of being a misogynist requires that they can define the meaning of the word "woman". If a person believes that anyone can be a woman then, by definition, they believe that misogyny is just a word that means to hate anyone.

The following is the modern Left's definition of the word misogyny, where anyone can be a woman if they self describe as being a woman:

misogyny noun
: hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against anyone who describes themselves as a woman.

[andysayshi @andysayshi1]

While I don’t celebrate sexist attacks in any way, let’s be clear that Jacinta Allan didn’t just turn a blind eye to women in prisons being housed with males, she championed it. She doubled down on it. And she paid off a woman who was abused as a consequence of her policy, with tax payer funds.

If the choice is between a bad-taste slogan and a political policy that covers up the actual sexual abuse of women, we all know which is worse.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

99.9% of people do not wish to attempt to reject their biological sex. They still need to be protected in legislation. It is a fools errand to demand that 99.9% of people give up their legal protections for the .1% (“tiny”, she says it herself).

If you want legal protections for the “tiny, marginalized, disadvantaged community” that rejects biological reality, find a way to do it that doesn’t take away legal protections for the 99.9% of people who do need protections on the basis of sex.

The SEX discrimination commissioner is paid $400,000 per year to deal with this issue. But there you go, I solved the problem for you, for free.

[Lesbian Action Group @ActiveLesbians]

Fire from @salltweets, and rightly so.

[Women's Action Group @womenwillspeak]

IN RESPONSE TO ANNA CODY'S ARTICLE IN TODAY'S AUSTRALIAN...

🚨🚨WE DO BELIEVE THE LAW, ANNA.🚨🚨

That is exactly the problem. We believe the SDA because we can see precisely what it has done: it has systematically stripped away the sex-based rights and protections of Australian women and girls. If Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody thought this article would quell the noise, she is sorely mistaken.

Cody’s column is a masterclass in institutional gaslighting. She looks Australian women in the eye and boldly claims there is "no evidence" 🤥 that men are harming women and girls in toilets and change-rooms. But she conveniently hides why that evidence is missing. Australia has gone so far down the gurgler on this rubbish that our justice system no longer records biological sex of offenders. When a bloke who claims to be a woman commits an offence, he is absorbed into female crime statistics. The data is broken by design to protect a political narrative, and Cody is using that engineered silence to claim women are safe. 🤨

To prop up this illusion, she executes a spectacular historical deception. She hooks her argument on 1993 court precedents, completely omitting that those early rulings were strictly tethered to irreversible medical and surgical criteria. By conflating the highly regulated medical precedents of 1993 with today’s self-identification (no medical or surgical criteria required) model, Cody's piece obscures how significantly the legal baseline has shifted beneath women's feet. 🧐

Never once in her entire article does Cody indicate she is actually concerned for the privacy, safety, or dignity of women and girls. Cody's sole anxiety is for the feelings of men who claim to be women. We see right through the two-faced rhetoric. The 'noise' isn't going anywhere until the law reflects reality again. 👴🚫🚺 @AustralianLabor @AnnaCody04 @AlboMP @MRowlandMP @SenatorCash @AngusTaylorMP @DanTehanWannon

*Thanks to @DoNoHarm79 for the link to a copy of the article🙏 READ HERE 👇
https://t.co/A0nd8EHi9y

[BroBro🇦🇺🏇🏻 @realRick_AUS]

Anthony Albanese taxed you more so he could get a 57k a year pay rise

That’s essentially what has happened

[Caroline Farrow @CF_Farrow]

I want to recap what actually happened at M&S, because some people seem determined to turn this into something it was not.

I went early evening because I thought the shop would be quieter. I was shopping with my teenage daughter, who is autistic and has sensory issues around clothing.

Anyone who parents a child with sensory difficulties will understand how hard clothes shopping can be. Fabric, fit, seams, tightness, waistbands, labels, texture, all of it matters. Something can look perfectly fine on the hanger and be completely unbearable once worn.

Ordering several sizes online and returning them is neither logistically nor economically feasible for us, and in any case my daughter likes to touch and see things before deciding whether she is comfortable with them. That approach simply doesn’t work for her.

So, for the avoidance of doubt, nothing would have suited me better than for my daughter to be able to try the clothes on and ensure she has enough things to see her through Summer.

That was the whole point of going to the changing rooms.

I was not looking for confrontation. I was not trying to make a political point. I was trying to make an ordinary shopping trip work for an autistic teenage girl who finds clothes difficult.

I walked into the changing area calmly and practically. My intention was to find a suitable cubicle, ideally the larger disabled one, check that it felt safe and manageable, and then encourage my daughter to follow me in.

That was the plan.

Had she been able to try the clothes on, it would have saved time, stress, uncertainty, returns, and the familiar nightmare of buying something that later turns out to be impossible for her to wear.

So the idea that I somehow wanted there to be a problem is absurd.

The changing room was supposed to be the solution.

The problem arose when my daughter became distressed by the presence of a male member of staff supervising the changing area. I had not anticipated her reaction. It was not scripted by me. I did not wind her up. I did not march in looking for a row.

She reacted. I saw her distress. I took it seriously.

And yes, I think a teenage girl, particularly an autistic teenage girl, is entitled to feel safe and comfortable in a changing-room environment.

This is not complicated. It is not about hating anyone. It is not about being difficult. It is not about “vibes” or emotional projection or whatever patronising theory people wish to attach to it online.

It is about a vulnerable young woman trying to buy clothes, and finding that the space provided did not feel safe or appropriate to her.

Parents of autistic children spend a lot of time trying to prepare, adapt, reassure, smooth things over, and make ordinary life manageable. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t.

On this occasion, it didn’t.

But I will not apologise for taking my daughter’s distress seriously. Or believing that M&S should change their policy.