آج پوری پی ٹی آئی کالعدم @JAAC__Official کی حمایت کررہی ہے، سوشل میڈیا پر انکی مہم بھی چلارہے ہیں، لیکن لوگ شاید بھول گئے ہیں جوائنٹ عوامی ایکشن کمیٹی پر غداری اور انڈین ایجنٹ ہونے کا لیبل سب سے پہلے @PTIofficial دور حکومت میں لگا تھا، جب 2022 میں آزاد کشمیر میں سردار تنویر الیاس وزیراعظم تھے، پی ٹی آئی قیادت نے اس وقت نہ صرف اپنے وزیراعظم کا دفاع کیا بلکہ عوامی ایکشن کمیٹی کی فنڈنگ اور مقاصد پر بھی سوالات اٹھائے تھے، اس وقت کے ترجمان پنجاب حکومت فیاض الحسن چوہان کے کشمیریوں کے بارے تضحیک آمیز بیانات بھی لوگ شاید بھول گئے ہیں، کوئی شک نہیں موجودہ حکومت میں بعض وفاقی وزراء کے بیانات سے کشمیریوں کے دل دکھے ہیں اور ایسے بیانات اور رویوں کی مذمت ہونی چاہیئے، کسی کو کشمیریوں کی تذلیل کرنے کا حق نہیں، لیکن یہ مذمت سیاسی وابستگیوں کی بنیاد پر نہیں اصولوں کی بنیاد پر ہونی چاہیئے، حقیقت یہ ہے کہ عوامی نمائندوں، سیاسی کارکنوں یا عوامی تحریکوں کو غداری، بیرونی ایجنٹ یا مشکوک قرار دینے کی روایت صرف کسی ایک جماعت تک محدود نہیں رہی ہے، ماہرنگ بلوچ پی ٹی آئی کے دور حکومت میں ڈی چوک پر احتجاج کرتی تھی تو مریم نواز شریف وہاں جاکر نہ صرف اظہار یکجہتی کرتی تھی بلکہ بلوچوں کے ساتھ روا سلوک کو ظلم قرار دیتی تھی، لیکن اب ن لیگ کے دور میں ہی ماہرنگ بلوچ کو عمر قید کی سزا سنائی گئی، پی ٹی آئی ہو، مسلم لیگ ن ہو یا پیپلز پارٹی ہو، کوئی بھی جماعت اختلافِ رائے کو دبانے یا مخالف آوازوں کو بدنام کرنے کے لیے ایسے ہتھکنڈے استعمال کرے، اس کی یکساں مذمت ہونی چاہیے، اگر ایک بات اپنے دورِ حکومت میں درست اور مخالف کے دور میں غلط قرار دی جائے تو اسے اصول پسندی نہیں کہا جاسکتا۔
"There are many countries which have ballistic missiles in their stockpiles. Why object to Iran's missiles. This would lead to unnecessary delays. Ballistic missiles was never part of the agenda that was discussed, not part of MoU and never on the table", says Pak PM @CMShehbaz in his joint presser with Iran President in Islamabad
تبدیلی آئی رے۔۔۔ وزیراعلی خیبر پختونخوا سہیل آفریدی کے صوابدیدی فنڈ میں ہوش ربا اضافہ، حالیہ بجٹ 2026 میں صوابدیدی فنڈ 50 کروڑ روپے سے بڑھا کر 4 ارب 40 کروڑ روپے کر دیا گیا۔
President @drpezeshkian, seen off by Pakistan's Army Chief, departed for the Presidential Palace in Pakistan for a meeting with his counterpart, Asif Ali Zardari.
Welcomed Iran’s Speaker of Parliament HE Dr. Ghalibaf and FM Dr. Araghchi in Muscat this evening. Constructive discussions on the recent Iran-US MOU, especially the Strait of Hormuz paragraph. We affirmed commitment to international law and toll-free safe passage.
Iran's Ghalibaf:
In the middle of the discussions, I learned that Trump had made threatening remarks regarding our president, the negotiating team, and possible attacks on our territory.
I told Vance: “We are here engaged in talks, and according to the signed understanding, the first clause states that there should be no threats or coercion. Yet today your president has issued threats. Understand that we never negotiate under threats or pressure.”
We ended the negotiations, left the meeting, and did not return.
The American side sought another meeting through the mediators, but we refused. The Qatari and Pakistani mediators then came to us, and we told them that we would speak with them, but not with the American side directly.
The outcome of these discussions and the 80-minute negotiations was the statement later released by the Pakistani and Qatari side.
Tireless Pakistani and Qatari mediation has delivered major progress to end Lebanon War. Oil and petrochem exports are waived, blockade lifted, some frozen assets released, and major reconstruction & development plan launched for Iran.
1st real test: Lebanon deconfliction cell
Let's be honest,the Iranian delegation's performance in Switzerland was a masterclass in psychological and diplomatic leverage.
They arrived on their own terms, made the Americans wait, refused even the symbolic gesture of a handshake, held firm to their demands, and walked away the moment they usual threats from Donald Trump entered the conversation.
In doing so, they projected confidence while exposing the American desperation and weakness.
What stands out is the Persians' sophisticated understanding of symbolism and strategy.
Every move is calculated, every gesture deliberate, as though they are several moves ahead in a chess match while their counterparts is struggling to keep up.
The result is a striking contrast: Iran is composed, disciplined, and in control, while the United States is reactive and outmaneuvered.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to deny the fact that Iran has now emerged as one of the most influential and formidable powers in the Middle East......
کاری که عباس عراقچی با ونس کرد، آدم باید خدایی بگه، اسامه بن لادن با ۱۱ سپتامبر اینطور حیثیت آمریکا رو لکهدار نکرده بود.
دو ساعت ونس اون ور یه لنگهپا ایستاده بود این عاصم و شهباز، عباس رو راضی کنن یه دستی، سلامی چیزی جلو دوربین با ونس داشته باشه.
عباس پیچید رفت.
خاک عالم بر سرت ونس.
عباس انتقام زلنسکی رو گرفتی.
فوری فوری
عراقچی آمد در سالن به شریف گفت اجازه نداریم در جایگاهی که آماده کردید بنشینیم و حضور پیدا کنیم..
شریف کاملا معلومه شوکه شده و نمیداند چه بگوید..
Araghchi briefly appeared in the same room with Vance before the cameras.
But Iranian sources report Tehran refused to enter the meeting until journalists left, rejecting what they called an American "media show."
Iran is still denying Trump the photo-op he's long sought.
After roughly 45 min, the bilateral meeting between FM @araghchi and his Swiss counterpart @ignaziocassis came to a close at Bürgenstock Hotel. Quadrilateral talks between Iran, the US, Pakistan, and Qatar are expected to commence shortly at another venue on the same premises.
اس بل میں کون سے خطرات ہیں وہ زرا سینٹ قائمہ کمیٹی برائے آئی ٹی کے ممبر سینٹر افنان اللہ خان سے سنیں جنہوں نے سینٹر پلوشہ خان اور سینٹر سعدیہ عباسی کے ساتھ مل کر وزارت آئی ٹی کے حکام سے چھبتے ہوئے سوالات پوچھے جن کا جواب افسران کے پاس نہ تھا۔۔
سینٹر افنان بھی حیران ہیں یہ appropriate government کیا ہوتی ہے جس کا بل میں ذکر کیا گیا ہے؟
@afnanullahkh@PalwashaKhan18
❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by @Khanalizadeh_EN
According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected.
After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it.
After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all.
He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis.
Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file.
This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions.
After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader.
The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions.
Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure.
The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit.
After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU.
The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks.
SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member.
Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented.
One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …).
Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU.
Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.”
The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework.
The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC.