@MutahiNgunyi@MutahiNgunyi However much you twist the narrative, what @edwinsifuna is simply saying, first address pertinent issues affecting various people differently. It will make serious sense if the Luhyas for example were given more chicken and more chicken houses.
@abbiezuena If this your view yet you move around with @edwinsifuna you may fumble his election. Babu is very clever and his actions to undermine him are subtle and that is why you don't seem to see any issue.
@genz___baddie We all know elective positions are not linear. If that is his stand then he will do anything to get to where he wants. He already knows @edwinsifuna is a threat to his vision especially if he becomes president. He will do all it takes to sabotage him but subtly.
@genz___baddie "When he entered elective politics, he had already mapped out his journey; two terms as MP in 2017 and 2022, then governor in 2027, and eventually president. He has spoken about this vision consistently and unapologetically." From this don't you get the point?
@Otenga4Otenga@Naomikibandi Kenya has had presidents without Luos' votes, @edwinsifuna should avoid them completely and have a thorough discussion with @rigathi early enough. It's in the best interest of all luo politicians for @edwinsifuna to lose presidency. It's time 4 macuzo @abbiezuena
@MigunaMiguna No Dr. @MigunaMiguna. He drafted the doc together with Prof. @AnyangNyongo and in it he included the clause that required the gov not to kill its citizens going forward but did not sign it. You are twisting things to make your narrative against @edwinsifuna make sense.
@C_NyaKundiH What many people who consume @C_NyaKundiH's data do not know is that he is a subtle spanner boy of President Ruto. He is out to influence the public to think that it is only Ruto vs Kalonzo and if that happens he'll discredit Kalonzo quite easily.
@edwinsifuna Ruto will not be president if he stayed in ODM. He now has the power to buy it. Seize the opportunity, your star is all out - Your Party then Presidency.
@C_NyaKundiH That's a ploy they had. When the bill is returned to parliament, the president makes recommendations to what needs to be done. He's recommendations requires two thirds of members to veto. Incase mps fail to veto it becomes an act. So did he reject in totality or he made changes?