Vid

#Consequentialist #Pragmatist #SelfDeterminist #SelfInterest #LPNAPV+

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@TheDemocrats They’re already taxed… wym?

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@SenWarren Tax deez nutz

[Dave Smith @ComicDaveSmith]

Best community note ever

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@ninaturner Almost forgot we’re not free, we’re State Property. Forgive me master.

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@AjitPai Thank you for saving our internet! 💯 #NeverForget

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@GavinNewsom Abraham Lincoln has entered the chat.

[Justin Amash @justinamash]

One of the most frequently misrepresented federal statutes—often falsely used to justify unconstitutional presidential war powers—is the War Powers Resolution (or Act) (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-1550).

If only more people would read it.

Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution, it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60-90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours.

Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly:

"The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress's approval) offensive military action.

The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress's express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war). The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress's approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans.

It's for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there's an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account.

The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the "power to repel sudden attacks" but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval.

The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack.

[Janice Elizabeth McAfee @theemrsmcafee]

Good morning everyone😊

I hope this video answers everyone's concerns about whether mine and John's account has been compromised.

@AIntivirus @officialmcafee

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@MarkPea07153819 @SallyMayweather The way they worded the question was quite possibly a video-clip trap “economic or military action.” So, both or just one of them?

Wish they’d do a better job of asking precise questions, while they’re trying to regain our trust; if they’re even trying.

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@Arbys @greg16676935420 What I gotta do for some homestyle fries???

#NeverForget

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@DarrigoMelanie A screen capture with a click-bait title? I should totally trust it! 😂

Post the full video unedited or link if you want to change people’s minds. 🧠

Very on-brand for government to do so since the mid-1780s though.

[Martha Bueno @BuenoForMiami]

Dear President Trump (@Potus)

If you could go ahead and pardon Ross now, I can stop checking my phone like a crackhead.

Thank you.
Signed,

Every #FreeRoss person on the planet

[Vid @MexichauN_]

#FreeRoss

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@wirelyss @AutismCapital Ross will be freed too

[Dave Smith @ComicDaveSmith]

Free Ross!!

[Ron Paul @RonPaul]

Elon Musk asked me to advise the new Dept. of Government Efficiency. I’d love to help bring sanity back!

However, I still think Americans need to shield their retirement funds ASAP from this much bigger threat (from our sponsors): https://t.co/TDOtDBU7EA

[Aaron Day @AaronRDay]

Roger Ver paid his taxes and faces 109 years in prison. SBF engaged in campaign finance fraud, money laundering, and more and only received 25 years.

We are ruled by criminals.

#freeroger

[Vid @MexichauN_]

@SallyMayweather Also, maybe not fund the creation of Hamas to destabilize the region in the first place 😂

[Michael Malice @michaelmalice]

Laken Riley's killer gets a life sentence
Meanwhile Kyle Rittenhouse never even gets charged

This is what white privilege looks like