Candace’s claim is that the fed narrative is a lie and so she investigates every possible lead and theory.
Andrew’s (stated) position is that Tyler Robinson did it alone and the evidence is so strong that he’ll wipe the floor with anyone that wants to debate that.
But Andrew’s actual goal seems to be to try to quote farm a bunch of out of context moments from throughout Candace’s year long investigation to try to win word games interrogating her body of work.
Because he’s scared to debate the central point- the feds, TPUSA’s, and his claim that the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler did it all on his own.
It’s even implied that the evidence is so overwhelming that it’s morally wrong for Candace to investigate at all.
Candace is offering Andrew the opportunity of a lifetime right now. But she’s correctly asserting that the first topic of discussion should be the actual evidence in the murder if Charlie Kirk. Not Andrew’s opinion of Candace’s podcast. Though she graciously offered to field all his very important concerns about her show in the second half of the discussion.
The only reason he would be saying no at this point is because he doesn’t want the central point to be about the fed narrative and the overwhelming evidence. Because Andrew doesn’t seem to actually affirmatively believe that.
He’s just interested in trying to mud wrestle with snippets of Candace’s past work.
That’s how it looks to me from out here having watched them go back and forth all day.
It’s amusing. But I hope Andrew actually takes the opportunity. Im sure it’ll make great television.