Trying to stop panicking ahead of the vote on Monday re our #claddingcrisis - here’s a palate cleanser. At least this parrot can leave its cage! https://t.co/V1rKNV7GLb
@SadiqKhan#endourcladdingscandal WHY did #TowerHamlets declare our building as ‘safe’ to live in when it has come to light that it didn’t even meet fire regs at time of completion? Our NHBC guarantee is rendered useless and unfair law says TH ‘cannot be held accountable’
@BorisJohnson@Keir_Starmer our home was built shoddily by Hollybrook, doesn’t meet fire regs, have dangerous cladding & combustible insulation. We can’t claim NHBC guarantee as Tower Hamlets somehow approved building as ‘safe’ at time of completion! What’s the point of the NHBC?
@BorisJohnson@Keir_Starmer our home was built shoddily by Hollybrook, doesn’t meet fire regs, have dangerous cladding & combustible insulation. We can’t claim NHBC guarantee as Tower Hamlets somehow approved building as ‘safe’ at time of completion! What’s the point of the NHBC?
@TowerHamletsNow why was our building declared ‘safe’ to live in when it has now come to light that it didn’t even meet fire regs at time of completion? NHBC guarantee rendered useless as a result. Outrageous! #endourcladdingscandal
@BorisJohnson@Keir_Starmer our home was built shoddily by Hollybrook, doesn’t meet fire regs, have dangerous cladding & combustible insulation. We can’t claim NHBC guarantee as Tower Hamlets somehow approved building as ‘safe’ at time of completion! What’s the point of the NHBC?
@BorisJohnson@Keir_Starmer our home was built shoddily by Hollybrook, doesn’t meet fire regs, have dangerous cladding & combustible insulation. We can’t claim NHBC guarantee as Tower Hamlets somehow approved building as ‘safe’ at time of completion! What’s the point of the NHBC?
@misskellyr2@Keir_Starmer Private companies (building owners, developers) can easily liquidate and rebrand themselves to escape negative press, escape responsibility. But we, the actual real people still living inside these unsafe homes, are left with the reality and the potentially life ruinin costs
@misskellyr2@Keir_Starmer That’s the other thing.. the owners to our buildings can take legal action against the developers for their construction failings, but if these private companies then fold and liquidate who will be responsible then?
@misskellyr2@Keir_Starmer Private companies (building owners, developers) can easily liquidate and rebrand themselves to escape negative press, escape responsibility. But we, the actual real people still living inside these unsafe homes, are left with the reality and the potentially life ruinin costs
@misskellyr2@Keir_Starmer That’s the other thing.. the owners to our buildings can take legal action against the developers for their construction failings, but if these private companies then fold and liquidate who will be responsible then?
@BruceWa83121340 @GeeeMurph@Keir_Starmer Well more to the point, they shouldn’t change regs without first fully knowing the impact of changing such regs and having a reasonable, workable plan for how those impacted can live with the reg changes. These are questions they should have been asking BEFORE, not now
In any other situation in life where one buys something - a defective product that was packaged and missold to them as something else entirely inferior - the consumer is NEVER the one liable for all the costs to remedy the situation! Why should it be different with our flats?
@Keir_Starmer Thank you so much for taking action. Millions of us are hopelessly trapped in unsafe flats. We had surveys, we used good conveyancers, none of us could have foreseen that we were walking into a financial nightmare. Developers must be the ones to remediate their unsafe buildings
@misskellyr2@Keir_Starmer It is appalling. They have deleted their twitter but are still active on instagram.. they have recently gone on to build many more ‘luxury’ spec buildings - who else is wondering how many of those are safe to live in now?
@Lees_Martina We are stuck in a one bed apartment, unable to sell, move, or plan to have a family due to the cladding scandal + shoddy construction of our building. Our building was built shoddily by Hollybrook, owned & managed by @GuinnessHomes #EndOurCladdingScandal
1/6 Fire-risk bills of £100,000 per flat - much bigger than government policy has factored in - are landing on doormats as ministers plan loans for leaseholders #EndOurCladdingScandal https://t.co/LcZmelGyQ1
@Keir_Starmer We’re now being told that we may have to pay for any works needed to correct all the issues in our building to make it safe to live in! Developers Hollybrook cut corners and didn’t construct the building properly, not meeting fire regs, THEY should pay to correct their mistakes!!
@Keir_Starmer In addition to Hollybrook’s inadequate build, we also have non-compliant exterior cladding & combustible insulation. Somehow Tower Hamlets signed off on our building as safe to occupy despite all these issues, but TH ‘can’t be held accountable’ apparently, under the law...
@Keir_Starmer We live in an apartment block built by Hollybrook Housing. Shocking recent investigations done by our freeholders reveal that Hollybrook did not build according to spec: Lack of firebreaks, gaps in walls, incorrect supplies used, resulting in our building not meeting fire regs!