Baron Coleman (@baroncoleman) claims Google Trends showed searches for Tyler Robinson before Charlie Kirk was killed.
Then he started looking up other names connected to the case. He says that’s where it got stranger:
🔥Dr. Berg explains how cancer behaves like a parasite.
The shocking part?
Cheap antiparasitic meds like Fenbendazole and Ivermectin target those exact mechanisms.
Why no big clinical trials from major centers? Expired patents = no pharma profits.#ivermectin
Vladimir Putin couldn't deliver a speech at the UN General Assembly due to ICC arrest warrant, but Benjamin Netanyahu can deliver his speech at the UN even with ICC arrest warrant! How much Zionist lobby have control over the UN and US.
This world has completely lost its meaning.
Was Shelby Kozak operating inside TPUSA? Was she TPUSA’s link to Hunter Kozak? He was clearly familiar with Terrell Farnsworth.
Hunter Kozak asked Charlie Kirk the final question of his life.
Hunter is tied to the Unfuck America Tour, the group that shadowed Charlie’s events to challenge and interrupt them.
A Project Constitution post first noted that Hunter’s wife, Shelby Kozak, was in the UVU crowd on September 10.
Eleven months later, Hunter confirmed it.
Her face looked familiar for a reason. She appears in a TPUSA group photo.
Put the pieces next to each other:
Hunter’s wife is linked to an organization whose views sit at the opposite end of the spectrum from the group Hunter works with.
Charlie Kirk is then killed at the exact event where Hunter asks the last question.
As well as showing Hunter practicing his shock and horror at Charlie’s assassination, ten minutes before he even gets up to speak to Charlie, this footage from before the also Q&A shows Hunter and Terrell Farnsworth exchanging looks and small gestures while another speaker is still at the mic.
Hunter forms a finger-gun with his hand and points it toward Charlie. Terrell answers with a sharp, warning glance and shakes his head in disbelief.
Does Erika Kirk know any of this?
Why were Hunter and Shelby not standing together?
Why didn’t Hunter look for her the moment the shot went off?
Why wait eleven months to say she was even there?
What, exactly, was Shelby doing with TPUSA?
BARON COLEMAN: “After shifting their opinions on Israel, Tucker gets fired, Stew gets cancelled, and Charlie gets killed. What’s the common denominator with those three people? Blake Neff.”
I can personally confirm this.
@JohPersso ‼️BREAKING PSA‼️moving forward-if your son displays spectrum qualities make sure he has a high presence on social media and very involved in his community. Otherwise, this administration will make his nouns PATSY
After everything I’ve watched unfold today, I want to make one thing crystal clear:
I love @RealCandaceO . I wholeheartedly support her.
Not because I believe she’s incapable of being wrong. Not because I think she should never be questioned. And certainly not because I’m willing to abandon my own discernment.
I support her because, time and time again, she has encouraged people to think for themselves, question the narrative, and follow the evidence—even when it’s uncomfortable.
My support has never come with a condition that says, “Candace can do no wrong.”
My condition is much simpler:
Don’t knowingly sit behind that microphone and intentionally lie to or deceive your audience.
If she makes a mistake, I can forgive a mistake.
If she gets something wrong, I can accept a correction.
If she changes her position because new information comes to light, I can respect that.
But if I ever become convinced that she knowingly deceived the people who trusted her?
Then we have a completely different conversation.
Until then, I’m standing right here.
I don’t need to tear her down because other people are having a falling-out.
I don’t need to abandon her because the internet is demanding that I pick a side.
And I damn sure don’t need anyone to tell me who I’m allowed to support.
My loyalty is to truth first. But as long as I believe Candace is sincerely pursuing that truth, she has my support. ❤️
FORBIDDEN STUDIOS PRESENTS: THE LORD OF THE MICS
One microphone to rule them all.
Many laid claim to it.
But from beyond the darkness, a light was coming.
The “six million Jews ⭐️” figure did not suddenly appear after the Holocaust.
Newspaper reports were using the figure years before Nazi Germany came to power. In 1913, references were already being made to approximately six million Jews in Russia and claims that they were facing persecution.
During 🪖World War I, newspapers again described six million Jews as being persecuted, starving, displaced or in danger.
The New York Sun ☀️ reported in June 1915 that six million Jews ⭐️—described as roughly half of the world’s Jewish population—were suffering under Russian persecution. Contemporary material from 1921 likewise referred to six million Jews in Ukraine 🇺🇦 and Poland 🇵🇱 as being in peril.
And the language continued into the 1930s. In January 1938, the New York Times reported that five to six million Jews in Europe were victims of governmental antisemitism.
In June 1938, Jewish demographer Jacob Lestschinsky wrote about the “status of six million Jews in Central and Eastern Europe.”
The Jewish ⭐️ Telegraphic Agency that same month described six million people in European areas of Jewish distress.
So yes—the phrase “six million Jews” demonstrably predates the Holocaust by decades. 🙈
#lies #australia #jews #history
To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia (2000) was written by Michael Parenti, an American political scientist and author.
It's a critical account arguing against the Western/NATO narrative of the breakup of Yugoslavia and the 1999 intervention.
It’s mind-boggling. They know I’m telling the truth, yet they look for some random loophole “3 kids opted out!”, to try to maintain their lie.
Just start with the truth. Why is this so hard for them? Why not simply say “Erika spoke at a school assembly today. We are grateful to the students for listening to her message and we are hopeful it will lead to sign up for Club America!”
It’s like the idea of telling the truth never even crosses their mind.
Lie. Gaslight. Rinse & Repeat.
Hey Blake— more parents rolling into the tips box and claiming that students were given an absence if they did not attend Erika’s speech.
Do you deny this?
Is your plan to gaslight underaged kids and their parents?
Is this the new way forward?; force students to watch Erika and then abusively gaslight them by claiming they could have simply opted out without mention of the consequence they would have endured?
So I posted this original video calling out Brian Harpole's lack of risk assessment last year, I knew it would become relevant again.
Trying to pass the responsibility onto UVU, the police and the event coordinators was apparent as soon as Brian Harpole opened his mouth the first time.
If Brian Harpole's risk assessment missed the fact there was two trap doors and a large tunnel/cavity under Charlie that could have held enough explosives to kill hundreds or worse than he's either completely incompetent or he's lying again. Why would you lie about something so easy to prove false?
Did Brian not expect us to check?
This fact alone denying the existence of any trap doors or tunnel system under Charlie is blatant proof Brian failed.
His failures reach far beyond this glaring issue however this is so damning there's no coming back from it.
He literally helped set up the tent on top of the trapdoors and there's no way he missed it.
Did the trap doors play a role in Charlie's death??
Why did he lie about them?