@bannister_jimbo@Finland_Edu@greenheroaf You seem to draw the wrong conclusion. I wish you were right, but sadly for the world, you are not. Time for you also, to wake up and write what helps. Not to distract. Good luck!
@bannister_jimbo@Finland_Edu@greenheroaf CERES observations showing correlated or in-phase fluxes do not disprove the greenhouse effect. Correlation and lack of a time lag do not establish that one flux cannot influence another. Radiative energy transfer occurs extremely rapidly, so a substantial time lag isn't expected
@bannister_jimbo@Finland_Edu@greenheroaf No. The primary reason the surface is warmer than 255 K is that greenhouse gases absorb infrared radiation and emit infrared radiation in both directions.
The surface emits roughly 390 W/m² of infrared radiation at 288 K. But not all of that goes directly to space.
@1000Frolly@Electroversenet Yes there are still places on earth were it did get colder in the last 10 years. But look at the overall picture. You have to, since facts that, in your view, contradict global warming will get more and more rare.
@tramwayz_@theserfstv It is like you are on the Titanic and see the iceberg ahead of you. "No don't go to the left, there might be rocks in the water!".
And you do nothing.
@TedGado@NotHoodlum You might be right. But what is most important, that Biden don't do a good job or that Donald Trump knows who abused and killed(?) children? Get your priorities together @tedgado