Di

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

HAHAHA … it’s not a £45 reduction in energy bills. It’s a tiny reduction in the size of the increase.

VAT on domestic electricity is only 5% anyway and Burnham isn’t removing it from gas!

The energy price cap has just risen by £221. So you’re now only £176 WORSE OFF 🤡

(Also, Digital ID front end was unfunded)

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

Andy Burnham just promised to 'govern for all' outside Number 10. Here's what he didn't mention...

Andy Burnham is Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Read that sentence again. Let it settle in your bones. The man who covered up the industrial-scale rape of 250,000 British children. The man who left a hospital where 1,200 people died without a public inquiry. The man who wasted £100 million of your money on abandoned schemes. The man who wants 10,000 more asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea. The man who put terrorist-sympathising smear merchants in charge of Number 10.

This is not politics. This is the capture of a nation by a machine of betrayal. This is the complete file on how Andrew Murray Burnham failed his way to the top.

PART I: THE NHS BODY COUNT

Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. Between 2005 and 2009, between 400 and 1,200 people died unnecessarily. Patients drank water from flower vases. They were left in soiled sheets. They died of thirst and neglect in a British hospital.

Andy Burnham became Health Secretary in June 2009. The families of the dead had one demand: a statutory public inquiry with full legal powers to compel witnesses and evidence. Burnham received 81 requests for this inquiry. He refused all 81. Instead, he appointed a limited independent inquiry chaired by Robert Francis QC. Held in private. Without the power to force testimony. Without the power to demand documents.

This was not incompetence. This was strategy. A limited inquiry admits failure without exposing the full rot. Burnham could express regret without revealing responsibility. He could promise change without delivering justice.

The families called it what it was: a cover-up. Julie Bailey, whose mother died at Stafford, called Burnham "grossly unsuitable" for leadership. The inquiry he refused could have saved lives. He chose his career over their children.

But Mid Staffordshire was not the only body count on his watch.

Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. Mothers and babies died. The Care Quality Commission, the regulator, found catastrophic failures. Then something strange happened. Baroness Young, chair of the CQC, gave evidence that pressure to "tone down" criticism "peaked under" Burnham's tenure as Health Secretary. Professor Sir Brian Jarman accused Labour ministers of "suppressing" work exposing problems. He called the Department of Health "a denial machine."

The pattern repeats. The regulator pressured. The criticism suppressed. The bodies buried. The minister promoted.

Then Hinchingbrooke Hospital. The first fully privatised NHS hospital in Britain. The process began under Burnham's watch in March 2010. The shortlist drawn up on the eve of the election. The contract signed by the Coalition in 2011. The hospital returned to the NHS in 2015 after Circle Health pulled out. Burnham now attacks Conservative NHS privatisation. He started the process himself.

This is the Burnham Method. Adopt the popular position. Act contrary in power. Express regret when safe.

PART II: THE PROPERTY CORRUPTION

The Greater Manchester Housing Investment Fund. £983 million of public money. The largest housing fund in the country. The promise: affordable homes for Mancunians. The reality: a feeding trough for developers.

Burnham's administration directed over £600 million to a single developer. Renaker. One company. Sixty percent of the entire fund. The £140 million loans were approved despite "inconsistent" viability reports. The Greater Manchester Combined Authority failed to obtain asset and liability statements from the developer. A report into these failures was suppressed for 13 months. The duty of candour was ignored.

Aubrey Weis, a wealthy landowner, challenged these loans in court. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled for the GMCA in 2025. The Court of Appeal heard the case in June 2026. Days before the Makerfield by-election that would make Burnham Prime Minister. The timing was not accidental. The corruption was not theoretical.

Then the donations. The 2026 campaign. £1,400 from Citybranch, a property developer. Burnham claims he never met the donor. The man who controlled £983 million in housing funds cannot remember meeting a property developer who gave him money.

The revolving door spins faster. James Purnell, Burnham's chief of staff in Number 10, was CEO of Flint Global. A lobbying firm. Clients include Huawei, Apple, BP, Amazon, Uber, Glencore. The man who advises the Prime Minister on policy spent years selling access to the same corporations. Transparency campaigners warned of conflicts of interest. Burnham appointed him anyway.

This is how it works. Public money flows to developers. Developers donate to campaigns. Campaigns win elections. Lobbyists write policy. The circle closes. You pay for it all.

PART III: THE RAPE COVER-UP

Operation Augusta. Manchester, 2003 to 2005. Police identified up to 100 men collecting girls from care homes like takeaway orders. At least 57 children in Manchester social services care, some as young as 12, were being gang-raped, trafficked, and tortured. Police had names. Police had addresses. Police had evidence.

The operation was shut down in 2005. Not because the danger passed. Not because the men stopped. Shut down because senior officers and Labour councillors were more afraid of "inflaming community tensions" than of protecting raped children. The perpetrators were predominantly Pakistani heritage Muslim men. The victims were white British girls. The decision was political. The children were abandoned.

Andy Burnham became Mayor of Greater Manchester in 2017. He commissioned independent reviews into historic child sexual exploitation in Manchester, Oldham, and Rochdale. The reviews confirmed widespread organised abuse. The reviews confirmed institutional failure. The reviews delivered no justice.

In 2024, the reviewers Malcolm Newsom and Gary Ridgway resigned. They alleged that authorities were "lawyering up" and obstructing the investigation. The duty of candour was missing. The cover-up continued.

Maggie Oliver knows the truth. She was the detective who blew the whistle on the Rochdale scandal. She worked with Burnham's reviews. She called the Oldham review "nothing less than a cover-up." She accused Burnham of failing to "grasp the nettle" on current failures. She saw the pattern: admit past failures to protect the present.

The numbers are staggering. The Rupert Lowe Rape Gang Inquiry Report, published June 2026, crowdfunded by 20,000 people, documented 250,000 young white British girls abused since the 1950s across 149 local authorities. The methods were torture. Girls as young as 11 collected from schools. Drugged with alcohol. Passed between men like currency. Taken to "red rooms" for daily gang rape. Trafficked to Pakistan. Forced to convert to Islam and marry rapists to legitimise pregnancies. Called "white trash" and "kuffar" by their abusers. The rape was racial. The rape was religious. The rape was targeted.

The institutional collapse was total. Police called victims "prostitutes." Social services placed children in trafficking hubs. NHS recorded genital injuries in children then discharged them without safeguarding. Schools excluded victims instead of protecting them. Taxi licensing renewed permits for drivers who transported children to rape houses.

Burnham's response? He called critics "desperate." He dismissed Reform UK's allegations as "smears." He stood by his record. His record is 250,000 victims and no justice.

Then there is Bev Craig. Executive Member for Adult Social Care in Manchester from 2017 to 2021. While Burnham commissioned his reviews, Craig oversaw the same adult social services that the Lowe Report says undermined parents, placed children in trafficking hubs, closed cases despite clear exploitation indicators, called victims "prostitutes," offered contraception instead of protection. She knew where the bodies were buried because she helped bury them.

In December 2021, council leader Richard Leese stepped down after 25 years covering the Operation Augusta period. His chosen successor? Bev Craig. The woman who oversaw the failures became the leader. Then Burnham's Deputy Mayor for Economy. Then the Labour candidate for Greater Manchester Mayor in July 2026. The coronation complete. Burnham to Prime Minister. Craig to Mayor. The rape gang inquiry investigating their city while they seize national power.

PART IV: THE OPEN BORDERS BETRAYAL

"Open Borders Andy." "Open Borders Burnham." The Reform UK nickname that sticks because the record supports it.

The double game is simple. Tough talk for election cameras. Soft reality for policy. In 2024 and 2025, Burnham made sceptical noises about mass migration. He supported some of Shabana Mahmood's reforms. He talked about ending hotel accommodation. The Critic saw through it immediately: "Suspect on immigration." "Embraces state multiculturalism." The nickname fits the record better than the messaging.

The record is clear. Burnham opposed longer waits for permanent settlement. He backed attacks on Indefinite Leave to Remain reforms. He supported ending "no recourse to public funds" restrictions. He wants asylum seekers working while claims are processed. This creates a magnetic pull factor for illegal entry. Why risk the Channel when you can work legally while waiting?

Then the bombshell. Reform UK's Zia Yusuf revealed Burnham's plans. Direct relocation of more than 10,000 additional asylum seekers from overseas. Specifically high-arrival nationalities like Sudan and Eritrea. Reversal of delays on permanent status for the post-2021 "Boriswave" cohort. Potentially granting benefits and family sponsorship rights to hundreds of thousands at catastrophic fiscal cost.

The Greater Manchester Combined Authority under Burnham spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on schemes helping migrants, including refugees, access housing, benefits, and services. Your taxes. Their priority. While British citizens sleep rough. While veterans wait for housing. While your grandmother waits for a hip replacement.

Nigel Farage has publicly blamed Burnham for the North West receiving a disproportionate share of asylum seekers. The "Open Borders Burnham" label is not rhetoric. It is description. The North West has cheaper housing costs. Long-standing Home Office policy places asylum seekers where rent is low. Burnham did not create the policy. But he did not fight it. He welcomed it. He built his "progressive" brand on it.

As Prime Minister, Burnham avoided immigration entirely in early speeches. He listens only to "insane open borders backbench MPs." Same soft policies. New face. Worse crisis. The borders remain open. The boats keep coming. The bill keeps rising. And Burnham is in Downing Street.

PART V: THE ISLAMIST SOFTNESS

Prevent. The UK's primary counter-terrorism safeguarding tool. The system that identifies vulnerable individuals at risk of radicalisation. The shield against Islamist terrorism.

In 2016, as Shadow Home Secretary, Andy Burnham called Prevent "toxic." He compared the reporting duty to internment in Northern Ireland. He said it made Muslims feel spied upon and unfairly targeted. He argued it risked creating the conditions for extremism to flourish. He wanted it scrapped or overhauled. This is not criticism. This is dismantling the main tool against Islamist radicalisation.

Then MEND. Muslim Engagement and Development. A group later named by Communities Secretary Michael Gove as having an "Islamist orientation." MEND hosted speakers supporting physical punishment for Jews, gay people, and minority sects. The Labour Party cut ties with MEND. Burnham did not. He endorsed MEND campaigns. He spoke at MEND fringe events. He platformed the group while it spread extremism.

Then CAGE. The organisation that praised "Jihadi John." The group that defended individuals linked to extremism. In 2021, Burnham co-hosted an interfaith iftar with the Ramadan Tent Project. Keir Starmer had withdrawn from the same event due to the group's CEO backing CAGE. Burnham stayed. Burnham hosted. The Muslim vote matters more than counter-terrorism concerns.

The Manchester Arena bombing. 22 May 2017. Salman Abedi. Islamist terrorist. 22 dead. 1,017 injured. The worst terrorist attack in Britain since 7/7. Burnham's response? Community cohesion. Avoid "Islamophobia." Prioritise relations. Do not confront. Do not name. The "Islamist-appeasing" accusations stick because the pattern is clear: the Muslim vote over border control, community relations over confronting political Islam, cohesion over courage.

The grooming gangs connect here too. The 250,000 victims. The predominantly Pakistani heritage perpetrators. The honour/shame clan codes. The targeting of white British girls as "kuffar." Burnham commissioned weak reviews. He avoided statutory public inquiries. The Muslim voting blocs of Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale mattered more than raped children. The pattern repeats. The community protected. The victims abandoned.

PART VI: THE STATE CAPTURE

July 2026. Andy Burnham becomes Prime Minister. His first appointments reveal everything.

Alison Phillips. Board member of Hope Not Hate Limited. The private company arm of Hope Not Hate. The same Hope Not Hate that faced Charity Commission investigations for political activity. The same Hope Not Hate that employed Liron Velleman, convicted of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. Phillips made Director of Transition in Burnham's Number 10. Her job: avoid the "early mistakes that befell Starmer."

Matthew McGregor. Former Director of Campaigns and Communications at Hope Not Hate. Made Director of Political Strategy in Burnham's Number 10. The man who ran smear campaigns now controls government political strategy.

Think about what this means. A man who ran Hope Not Hate's operations now controls the Prime Minister's political strategy. A woman who sat on Hope Not Hate's board while they faced regulatory investigations now controls the Prime Minister's transition. Anna Turley, former Hope Not Hate director, is already Labour Party Chair.

Hope Not Hate is not a charity. It is the continuation of Searchlight, a communist militant operation founded in 1964. It uses charitable status to launder taxpayer money into political warfare. It employs convicted child sex offenders. It uses blackmail, deception, and alleged drug supply to manufacture sources. It collaborates with the BBC to target political enemies. It spreads misinformation during civil unrest.

And now its operatives run the British government.

PART VII: THE METHOD

The Burnham Method is consistent across every scandal. Five steps. Recognisable. Repeatable.

Step One: Adopt the popular position. NHS defender. Civil liberties champion. Hillsborough campaigner. The man of the people.

Step Two: Act contrary when in power. Privatise NHS services. Implement ID cards. Suppress inquiries. Waste public money.

Step Three: Use limited inquiries. Avoid statutory public inquiries. Appoint friendly reviewers. Control the scope. Control the timing. Admit past failures to protect present power.

Step Four: Surround with lobbyists. Burson Marsteller. Flint Global. James Purnell. The revolving door spins. Access is sold. Policy is written.

Step Five: Express regret when safe. Years later. When politically convenient. When the damage is done. The apology tours begin.

The contradictions are stark. NHS defender who presided over mass death. Civil liberties champion who implemented ID cards. Anti-surveillance while voting for ID cards. Pro-union while appointing a chief of staff from a union-busting firm. Anti-privatisation while starting the Hinchingbrooke process. Pro-inquiry while voting against Iraq War investigations. Anti-war while voting for Iraq. Transparency while surrounded by non-transparent lobbyists. Man of the people while a career politician since age 24 with a Cambridge education.

PART VIII: THE MONEY

June 24, 2026. The day after the Makerfield by-election made Burnham Prime Minister. Two companies incorporated. Same day. Same address.

Office of Andy Burnham Ltd. Company number 17299283. Director: Andrew Murray Burnham. Correspondence address: 71 to 75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ.

Andy Burnham for Leader Ltd. Company number 17300460. Director: Andrew Murray Burnham. Correspondence address: 71 to 75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ.

Both verified by RAPID FORMATIONS LIMITED ACSP on June 19, 2026. Both active. Both controlled by the Prime Minister.

The funding tells the story. March to April 2026. £20,000 from trade unions. £10,000 from Fire Brigades Union. £5,000 from Communication Workers Union. £5,000 from Unison. The union paymasters. Then £1,400 from Citybranch, a property developer. The developer donor. The man who controlled £983 million in housing funds cannot remember meeting a property developer who gave him money.

The MPs' expenses scandal adds texture. The £215,000 London flat purchased in 2005, part-funded by taxpayer ACA claims. The IKEA receipt including a bathrobe, claimed as a "genuine oversight" and repaid. The spousal involvement. Marie France van Heel, his wife, "regularly in touch with fees office to negotiate claims." The June 2006 refusal when the fees office rejected covering both London and constituency mortgages as it breached rules. The 2010 leasing out of the flat when mortgage claims were banned, joking it was to avoid divorce.

The 2023 speeding conviction. 78mph in a 40mph zone. 95% over the limit. £1,984 fine. Six points. Rules for thee, not for me. The public safety champion endangering the public.

PART IX: THE FABIAN WOLF

The Burnham Method is not accidental. It is Fabian strategy, perfected over 140 years.

The Fabian Society was founded in 1884. Britain's oldest socialist think tank. The intellectual engine room of the Labour Party. Their strategy is "permeation" the slow, relentless infiltration of every lever of power until socialism becomes the default setting of British society. Not through revolution. Through a thousand quiet administrative changes. Laws. Regulations. Cultural shifts.

Their original coat of arms: A wolf in sheep's clothing. They have since changed it to a tortoise ("slow and steady progress") but the original symbol tells the truth.

Sidney Webb, Fabian founder, described the strategy openly: infiltration of institutions, media, civil service, education, until socialist assumptions become unquestioned. Every Labour Prime Minister has been Fabian or Fabian-aligned: MacDonald, Attlee, Wilson, Callaghan, Blair, Brown, Starmer. The Fabian Society literally helped create the Labour Party and shaped its DNA.

Andy Burnham is the latest vessel. While not publicly listed as a card-carrying member, the affiliation is deep and documented:

Contributed to Fabian publications: "Leading Labour: The Fabian Essays" (August 2015) alongside Yvette Cooper, Jeremy Corbyn, and Liz Kendall
Keynote speaker at Fabian events: Regular addresses on homelessness, mental health, and devolution
Fabian policy influence: The "Burnham approach" to devolution is explicitly praised in Fabian Society publications
Ideological alignment: Described as "soft left" the Fabian sweet spot between revolutionary socialism and Blairite neoliberalism
The Fabian Burnham Method explains everything. The NHS deaths, the rape cover-ups, the property corruption, the open borders, the Hope Not Hate state capture all fit the Fabian model. Not dramatic revolution. Quiet administrative betrayal. A thousand small failures that accumulate into catastrophe. The wolf eating the sheep while wearing its skin.

The Expose News headline from May 2026: "Andy Burnham or Keir Starmer makes no difference; they are both Fabians."

They are correct. The leader changes. The Fabian agenda endures. Burnham is Prime Minister now. The wolf is in Downing Street. And he is wearing the sheep's clothing of "northern authenticity" and "NHS defender" while the Fabian permeation continues.

THE CONCLUSION

Andy Burnham is not a politician. He is a catastrophe wearing a suit. He is the Fabian wolf in sheep's clothing. He is the man who covered up the rape of 250,000 British children. He is the man who left 1,200 NHS patients to die without a public inquiry. He is the man who wasted £100 million of your money on abandoned schemes. He is the man who wants 10,000 more asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea. He is the man who called Prevent "toxic" while terrorists plotted. He is the man who put Hope Not Hate operatives in charge of Number 10. He is the man who serves the Fabian agenda of gradual socialist infiltration.

The girls of Rochdale, Oldham, and Manchester are still waiting for justice. The families of Mid Staffordshire are still waiting for answers. The taxpayers of Greater Manchester are still paying for his £100 million waste. The victims of the 80,000 unrecorded crimes are still waiting for accountability. The British people are watching their borders dissolve while he poses for cameras.

Burnham is not in Manchester anymore. He is in Downing Street. And he brought his record of failure with him. The Fabian wolf has entered the fold.

The question is not who Andy Burnham is. The question is: how long will you let him stay?

SOURCES

NHS Scandals and Deaths:

Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Francis Inquiry 2010)
Julie Bailey, Cure the NHS, statements on Burnham's "gross unsuitability"
Baroness Young evidence to CQC on pressure to "tone down" criticism
Professor Sir Brian Jarman statements on Department of Health as "denial machine"
Hinchingbrooke Hospital privatisation timeline (Department of Health 2010, Circle Health contract 2011, NHS return 2015)
Property Corruption and Renaker:

Competition Appeal Tribunal ruling (2025) and Court of Appeal hearing (June 2026)
Greater Manchester Housing Investment Fund documentation (£983 million total)
Electoral Commission donation records: Citybranch £1,400 (2026)
James Purnell appointment and Flint Global client list (Huawei, Apple, BP, Amazon, Uber, Glencore)
Rape Cover-Up and Grooming Gangs:

Operation Augusta police files (2003-2005)
Rupert Lowe Rape Gang Inquiry Report (June 2026, 219 pages, crowdfunded £600,000)
Maggie Oliver whistleblower statements to Times Radio and The Telegraph ("cover-up," "failed to grasp the nettle")
Malcolm Newsom and Gary Ridgway resignation from Burnham's reviews (2024)
Bev Craig career timeline: Executive Member for Adult Social Care (2017-2021), Council Leader (December 2021), Deputy Mayor (2021-2026), Labour candidate for Mayor (July 2026)
Open Borders and Immigration:

The Critic, May 2026: "Andy Burnham's immigration double game"
Reform UK and Zia Yusuf statements on 10,000 additional asylum seekers and reversal of permanent status delays
Nigel Farage statements on "Open Borders Burnham" and North West asylum dispersal
Burnham support for asylum seeker work rights and ending "no recourse to public funds"
Islamist Softness and Prevent:

Andy Burnham 2016 statements as Shadow Home Secretary calling Prevent "toxic" and comparing to internment
Michael Gove House of Commons statement on MEND "Islamist orientation"
Burnham MEND fringe event attendance and endorsement records
Ramadan Tent Project iftar 2021 and Keir Starmer withdrawal
Manchester Arena bombing inquiry and Burnham "community cohesion" response
Hope Not Hate State Capture:

Companies House: Office of Andy Burnham Ltd (17299283) and Andy Burnham for Leader Ltd (17300460), incorporated 24 June 2026
Alison Phillips appointment as Director of Transition, Burnham Number 10
Matthew McGregor appointment as Director of Political Strategy, Burnham Number 10
Anna Turley Labour Party Chair and former Hope Not Hate director
Charity Commission investigations into Hope Not Hate (2024, 2025)
Liron Velleman conviction (January 2026) for attempted sexual communication with a child
Fabian Society Connection:

Fabian Society: "Leading Labour: The Fabian Essays" (August 2015)
Fabian Society publications praising "The Burnham approach" to devolution
The Expose News, May 2026: "Andy Burnham or Keir Starmer makes no difference; they are both Fabians"
Sidney Webb "permeation" strategy documentation
Fabian Society coat of arms history (wolf in sheep's clothing)
Personal Corruption and Expenses:

MPs' expenses scandal documentation (Telegraph 2009): bathrobe, spousal involvement, £215,000 flat
Companies House: Leigh BPT Limited (08786493), dissolved, Burnham director 2013-2016
Speeding conviction 2023: 78mph in 40mph zone, £1,984 fine, 6 points
Electoral Commission: trade union donations 2026 (Fire Brigades Union £10,000, Communication Workers Union £5,000, Unison £5,000)

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

One of numerous interviews over the past week covering issues of lack of victim care following release of Rochdale child rapist Shabir Ahmed…. This with @CamillaTominey on her Sunday Politics show….

https://t.co/ehchtv78h0

[Fr Calvin Robinson ©️®️ @calvinrobinson]

British police are a farce.

Yet again, an officer attempts to silence a street preacher for potentially offending sinners by talking about sin.

In a Christian country, they do not want you preaching the Gospel.

Preach it anyway, like this man. 🔥🔥

[Proudofus.uk @ProudofusUK]

🇬🇧 THEY TOLD YOU A STORY. 🇬🇧

Colonisers. Slavers. Oppressors. And you were supposed to feel ashamed.

Not for what you done... But for WHO YOU ARE. 🇬🇧

So we tested it. Britain wrote everything down, so we opened the books. 📖

Turns out fewer than 1 man in 10 could vote in the year Britain banned the slave trade. No woman could. Your ancestors could hang for stealing a sheep, get shipped across the world for petty theft, or go down a mine at 8 years old. In Manchester, the average age of death in a labouring family was 17.

They weren't running the slave trade. They were underneath it too.

Which is what makes what happened next worth knowing.

In 1772 an enslaved man named James Somerset walked free from an English court, because English law couldn't hold a slave.

In 1791, 300,000 families just stopped buying slave sugar. No march, no riot, just a decision made at 300,000 kitchen tables.

In 1792, 519 petitions carrying 390,000 names hit Parliament, most signed by people who couldn't vote themselves.

In 1807, Britain banned the trade.

Then the slave owners sent Britain a bill for the 800,000 people they still held. 💷 £20 million. About 40% of the entire government budget at the time.

The Treasury says it wasn't paid off until 2015. So if your family paid British tax before then, they helped buy 800,000 people their freedom.

From 1808 the Royal Navy spent 60 years hunting slave ships at sea: 1,600 stopped, 150,000 people freed, and 1,600 British sailors dead, mostly of disease, buried thousands of miles from home. ⚓

In 1816 they ended two centuries of Barbary corsairs enslaving Europeans.

In 1896 a war that lasted 38 minutes ended slavery in Zanzibar. 🇹🇿

Almost every country on Earth outlaws slavery today.

That fight was paid for largely at British expense, by British hands.🇬🇧

So why haven't you heard any of this?

Because within living memory, someone rewrote the story. You got taught the crime. Not the cure.

The powerful exploited the world. They exploited their own people first. It was those people who ended slavery. 🇬🇧

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

History got rewritten once, in living memory, by no one who was ever named or held to account.

We are ordinary people doing what ordinary people have always done. Opening the books. Refusing to look away.

This is how we fight back. Fact by fact. Story by story. Name by name.

We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it.

If you can afford to support what we do: https://t.co/rih7iKwnvf

Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

Imagine dragging the Prime Minister in front of a national inquiry, forcing him to testify under oath about his role in covering up the Pakistani grooming gangs scandal.

We can make this a reality. But I need your help.

For 8 years, I've exposed the cover-up of Pakistani rape gangs by police and politicians. Our campaign in Oldham forced a national inquiry. Now, we must compel this inquiry to investigate a place it wants to avoid: Andy Burnham's record.

As Mayor of Greater Manchester, Burnham fronted sham "assurance reviews". They were nothing more than a cover-up of the cover-up. He would have succeeded if not for us. We fought for a national inquiry despite his efforts to bury the truth.

The inquiry won't examine Burnham's actions unless we demand it. The clock is ticking. He's poised to become Prime Minister within weeks. Once he's in Downing Street, the establishment will shield him. Institutions will dodge accountability. The press will look away. Only we can carry the truth.

That's why Red Wall and the Rabble must become more than a one-man operation.

Before Burnham reaches Number 10, help us gain 2,000 new paid subscribers.

Sign up here:
https://t.co/56iWix5yC4

With your support, we can send complicit politicians to prison. Isn't that prospect alone worth backing?

Raja Miah MBE

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

🙏🏻

[Michelle Dewberry @MichelleDewbs]

Parents & grandparents, auntie & uncles…

Look at this face & learn this name: Thomas Waller.

Never, ever let him anywhere near your children.

I am sickened by what he has done. Sickened by the fact he walks the streets while awaiting sentence (he is a child RAPIST!) & utterly perplexed at how any mother could walk alongside their son if he did this.

This man is dangerous scum & my heart absolutely breaks for his victims & their families💔

[Ellie-Ann Reynolds @EllieAnnRe71927]

The Prime Minister thanked me for supporting his grooming gang inquiry. He didn’t thank me for telling the truth.

The truth is he lied. His minister lied. And now they want survivors to return to a process built on lies. My letter to him is here.

Here is my reply to his letter.

[Sarah Pochin MP @SarahForRuncorn]

Dear @WesStreeting, I’m sorry you feel that way. Perhaps you could remind us all how strongly you spoke up when this happened.

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

Following an extensive enquiry by @Daily_Express and their Chief Crime reporters myself and @chriswild79 were asked to analyse some cases from @metpoliceuk

This investigation was prompted when @MayorofLondon Sadiq Khan repeatedly refused to answer questions posed at the London Assembly around the existence of “grooming gangs” in London.

The findings are here, and it’s interesting that 24 hours after the “right to reply” deadline had expired, @metpoliceuk acknowledged the existence at least of such cases….

This replicates the pattern I have been seeing for 20 years - ignore, deny, continue to lie, cover up until it’s no longer possible when the evidence is produced for all to see…. #TheyKnew

Much more to follow.

https://t.co/MAc8jsoIs6

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

There’s always a tweet.

[Women’s Safety Initiative @WomenSafety_UK]

A man with HIV and his brother raped girl and got her pregnant in West Yorkshire.

Our girls deserve to be safe. Yet these headlines are now weekly.

[Ahmed Al-Khalidi @khalidi79397]

As a Palestinian who openly opposes Hamas and rejects the glorified myths our society keeps repeating, I can’t stay silent about the sheer hypocrisy I see from many Western liberals.

How can you defend a movement that executes its own people, by shooting them in the street, without trial, for merely disagreeing or being labeled “collaborators”? How can you call that “resistance” while those very scenes mirror the barbarism you’d condemn anywhere else in the world?

You claim to stand for liberal values, for human rights, for justice. But your empathy collapses when the victims are Palestinians murdered by other Palestinians, when it doesn’t fit the neat narrative of oppressor and oppressed.

What does that say about your values, really?
If you can overlook public executions and rule by terror just because the perpetrators shout “liberation,” then maybe your solidarity isn’t rooted in morality but in ideology.

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

Oldham Rape Gang Cover Up Continues
How The Labour Government Is Trying To Exclude Oldham From The National Inquiry

Instead of including Oldham in the National Inquiry, the government is now trying to push a 'Truth Project' onto the town. So there is no ambiguity, this means;

- No power to compel documents
- No power to call witnesses
- No power to put ministers or police chiefs under oath
- No power to bring prosecutions

This is a parallel process designed to stop the statutory inquiry from uncovering the truth about Oldham.

This would not be possible without the direct involvement of @jessphillips, our so called Minister for Safeguarding Girls.
_________

Please Help Me Finish This.

If you are coming to me new, my name is Raja Miah MBE. I am responsible for leading a six year campaign that blew the lid off how Labour Party politicians were involved in protecting Pakistani Rape Gangs.

You won’t find me on any news channel in the UK nor featured in the legacy press. I take this scandal to a place from where there is no coming back.

My work is free for all. No paywalls. No restrictions. No exclusions of any kind.

We are up against a powerful machine: legacy media, politicians, police and public officials working together to bury the scale of this cover-up. To fight back, we need to grow. Unfortunately, our numbers aren’t where they need to be.

Please consider subscribing to my newsletter. I share all of my analysis and research here in a way that just is not possible on social media.
👉 https://t.co/56iWix5yC4

A one-off contribution also makes a massive difference. Every penny goes towards keeping my work alive and securing a National Inquiry.
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy

Without your support, powerful politicians will continue to bury this. Without your support, there will be no justice. Please stand with me.

Raja 🙏

[Emma Kenny @emmakennytv]

If Britain is so bloody racist it’s doing an awful marketing job, as a TON of people want to live here. How about politicians start telling the truth, the great British public (of all ethnicities) are the best people the world has to offer. Fuck off with your far right bullshit…..wanting a fair society still requires boundaries and one of those should be applying for residency and asylum legally.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.

Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

[Ant Middleton @antmiddleton]

How is he still Mayor of London! HOW??? Actually we know why…

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

I won’t. Repost if you agree.

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

No wonder Tony Blair wants Digital IDs… when his son is the owner of the company that’ll be paid £100 billion to develop and monitor them.

And ol’ Tony has £375 million worth of shares in the company, too.