🚨 CHARLIE KIRK CRIME SCENE BREAKING 🤯
Judicial Watch's GRAMA request on the paved-over Charlie Kirk crime scene has been revealed.
On late evening, Friday September 12, at nearly 8 pm, two days after Charlie was killed, UVU groundskeepers were told by local police that they wouldn't need to cut out any sod. The groundskeepers were happy at this news and discussed only needing to hose the area down.
But one of them then remarked that they couldn't do it yet because the FBI was still processing the crime scene.
That was late Friday night.
By Saturday afternoon the next day, the FBI & Governor Spencer Cox has overruled the local police and ordered not only the sod to be torn up, but the ground to be excavated to 10 inches deep!
That led to the now infamous "paver emergency" on Sunday morning, where another separate crew was brought in to pave over the crime scene after the first crew dug it up the day before.
Remember, all this happened AFTER the FBI finished examining the crime scene on Friday night, and after the local police had indicated a simple hosing down would be enough.
WHAT DID THE FBI FIND? WHY DID THEY ISSUE AN EMERGENCY ORDER TO DIG IT OUT AND PAVE IT OVER?
Israeli settlers, brandishing American made M4s, detained me & other Americans on my trip to Palestine.
When the IDF arrived, they sided with the settlers & continued our detention.
They made a huge mistake.
You will be hearing more soon. https://t.co/rZw8bRAn64
Tucker Carlson: “The truth is, after this war, it’s impossible to say Trump’s Republican Party, MAGA is acting on behalf of the US. It’s acting on behalf of Israel, that’s just a fact. That’s the opposite of what they told us we were getting. It’s such a betrayal. We really believed you were gonna at least try and in the end it’s all about cryptocurrency scams and wars for Israel? I can’t believe you did that. I’m outraged that someone I supported would betray the country and his own voters and then to whip around and say I’m not loyal? You’re disloyal. You sold out the country to a foreign nation”
Don't let @TPUSA and Charlie's security team get away with not answering why they called Ben Shapiro's security while Charlie was dying. Charlie should have been receiving 100% undivided attention. There is no reason for doing this that isn't chilling. NONE! 🤬
Let me get this straight:
We are supposed to believe the Republican leaders are hiding a dead Mitch McConnell from the President to thwart his agenda?
So, Trump - with his own FBI, CIA, Space Force, military, etc. can't confirm whether Mitch McConnell is alive?
Wake up.
To believe that Jack Posobiec and the Epstein binder Jew crew saw high-quality 4K video of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk, you would have to ignore the fact that the prosecution told the court there is absolutely no video of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk.
‼️🇺🇸: There's NO VIDEO OF the ACTUAL CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTING per Utah State Prosecutor —7/7/2026. 👀
ANYONE TELLING YOU OTHERWISE is LYING and SHOULD BE UNFOLLOWED.
They are tools of the state. 🫡
This is so manipulative, and you know it.
I was there today along with @brandisiciliani and we made SURE to get the phone numbers of the other members of the public incase something like this happened.
They showed a compilation of ~ 15 UVU security clips, MOST of which have already been shown to the public. Only 3 of the clips shown in court today were new to my eyes, and none of them were “high quality footage where you can see Tyler Robinson’s face crystal clear.”
I also think it’s worth mentioning that I know where you were sitting.. and you were absolutely NOT able to see how Tyler Robinson was reacting as the court played this footage?
I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of “Tyler” jumping off the roof shown in this screen shot.
I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.
Andrew
Let me offer advice.
Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.
When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.
Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.
That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.
Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.
Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.
You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.
That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.
So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.
Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.
You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@JohnMappin@ImMappin@joekent16jan19@TRobinsonNewEra@LionelMedia@IanCarrollShow@AwakenWithJP@jimmy_dore@OwenBenjamin@leahfiles@realstewpeters@EstulinVz@RealAlexJones@HarrisonHSmith@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel
BREAKING NEWS: Seventy-Two Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation In Massachusetts.
National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.
Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement.
Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.
The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons.
Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.
One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”
Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.
During a tense standoff in the Lexington town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.
Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange.
Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.
Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops.
Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as “ringleaders” of the extremist faction, remain at large.
And this, My fellow Americans who do not know your History, this is how the American Revolution began on April 20, 1775.
Imagine another scamdemic lockdown with Flock cameras, kill switch cars & cashless digital currency. This is the point of surveillance, I mean data centers
There’s no energy crisis- 106M illegals 55M visas.
There’s no housing shortage- 106M illegals 55M visas.
There’s no jobs issue- 106M illegals 55M visas.
There IS a treasonous government issue!
@POTUS@VP@DHSgov@SecMullinDHS
My team and I were trying to confirm the null hypothesis, which is that CK was shot with a .30-06 from the stated position on the roof of the Losee building.
To confirm this hypothesis, we should have been able to get a .30-06 round top stop in a simulated human neck.
Even when we thoroughly stacked the deck in favor of that null outcome (by purposely shooting thicker muscle masses with thick bones in them), we were unable to reproduce that behavior. Not even close.
Because we used fresh backstops, we can also state that we didn't even get one shot to meaningfully deflect even slightly. They all went straight through.
We repeated the tests 55 times with 5 different .30-06 loads (see below). Every round was cataloged, and videos were taken from 2 directions, with one camera at 260 fps and the other at 460 fps.
So we are in the position of rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the other, which was that the shot that killed CK was not taken with a .30-06 from that position.
This is how experiments are conducted scientifically.