@carrtmannn Maybe…… but she was murdered by a n1gger (just seconds after that still). So I guess we will never really know (if you want to get technical).
The idea that the Saxons were pure pagans, sitting in a vacuum until Charlemagne forced them into Christianity at the edge of a sword, is just modernist cope.
And i say this with my full Germanic-Saxon heritage.
The first Bible ever translated into a Germanic language was the Gothic Bible, produced through the Eastern Church in the 4th century. So over 400 years before Charlemagne took up his sword.
Christianity was already in Germanic blood and Germanic speech before the Franks ever marched north.
The Franks, our own kin, entered the faith freely in 496. That’s two and a half centuries before Charlemagne was even born.
The Anglo-Saxons, our brothers who crossed the sea to Britain, were won peacefully by missionaries in the 7th century.
Then those Anglo-Saxon Christians (Boniface chief among them) sailed back to the continent to bring the Gospel to their Saxon and Frisian cousins.
By the time Charlemagne began his campaigns the faith had been woven into Germanic life for generations.
And here’s the real damning detail, even Charlemagne’s own court scholar (Alcuin of York) condemned the forced conversions insisting that faith must be won and not imposed.
Yet the modern narrative tells you Christianity is alien to Germanic blood, a so called foreign religion hammered in from outside. Well that’s a lie…
The true history is way older, deeper and messier than the schoolbook cartoons majority knows today.
My ancestors didn’t just have the faith imposed on them by strangers but rather received it from their own kin and it had already taken root in our soil long before the official narrative claims.
The Gospel came to our people not as a conqueror’s demand, but as a natural homecoming. That is factual history you can try to wave away but you cannot rewrite.
It’s about time we, including the pagans, remember that and embrace it.
@TheOnlyDSC I do need context, but it would not change the end result (of a negro behaving violently). It is just really confusing (probably even with context).
@devi_agivvra@BigDickBarclay@MaxmumEffortMax So one must celebrate a heretical commie nigg3r to be American? Odd sounds like something his Jewish commie writer would agree with.
@Gengaremon@TheOnlyDSC Missed the “'arrest for nothing' and dindu” (they are basically the same and she is shouting “for what”), pregnant (she is shouting she is in labor), and you probably could count talking on phone (at the start she is at least looking at it).
As usual, pagans have a jewish worldview and try to gate-keep what is white. The jews didn't think Jesus was their king, and Jesus never said he was king of the jews. The title was put on the cross to mock him. Just like the cross was a brutal form of punishment that Christians turned into a symbol of triumph over death, the title was kept to show how the jews mocked him.
It was a false charge of blasphemy
Pagans can't read and they are detriment to White determination.
John 19:19-22
Matthew 27:37
Matthew 27:41-43
Mark 15:31-32
Luke 23:36-37
Luke 23:39
The U.S. really is amazing!
Is there a supermarket inside a gorilla enclosure?
And they’re even wearing clothes!
So, which one’s mad because its food was taken⁉
Both gorillas just look like they’ve eaten too much, though.
@anchover_@FeelsGuy2003 Also if Nick was not probably on a list (if he has not become an informant as some theorize), was actually taking over the Republicans (that does not seem to be going well in reality), and did flip message every couple of months (Nat to Civnat, Lib Pope support come to mind).